• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Plurality Says Romney Qualified To Be President, Voters Divided on Cain

That sample size is really small for such a basic survey.
 
That sample size is really small for such a basic survey.

I noticed that but its one of the top reputable pollsters Rasmussen....I dont think cain will win the primary and I dont think he can beat obama...with his 999 and Social Security and Medicare stance..
 
I noticed that but its one of the top reputable pollsters Rasmussen....I dont think cain will win the primary and I dont think he can beat obama...with his 999 and Social Security and Medicare stance..

i agree, romney is qualified, and he might not do much harm, either.
 
i agree, romney is qualified, and he might not do much harm, either.

Let us assume that if Romney wins in 2012 that the GOP also takes the Senate and holds the House. The big question then becomes will Washington DC be a rerun of what has happened in states such as Wisconsin, Michigan and others where they not have one party rule? Would the Republicans use their majorities to introduce wide ranging and sweeping changes repealing much of the last 80 years of progressive reform?

And if they would do that, what would be the position of Romney in terms of signing such right wing legislation? The possiblity for harm is great.
 
Let us assume that if Romney wins in 2012 that the GOP also takes the Senate and holds the House. The big question then becomes will Washington DC be a rerun of what has happened in states such as Wisconsin, Michigan and others where they not have one party rule? Would the Republicans use their majorities to introduce wide ranging and sweeping changes repealing much of the last 80 years of progressive reform?

And if they would do that, what would be the position of Romney in terms of signing such right wing legislation? The possiblity for harm is great.

He would go along with all of it for the first two years minimum...then go into campaign mode
 
I believe Romney is the strongest candidate in the GOP race and might beat Obama. I seriously doubt the GOP will end up in power in both the Senate and House. Congress' approval rates have dropped to the lowest point in history and the approval rating of GOPs in Congress is even lower. They will be lucky if they can hold on to the House majority.
 
If the GOP does win the White House, I kinda hope the Democrats take back the House and keep the Senate. I personally am a fan of divided government.
 
If the GOP does win the White House, I kinda hope the Democrats take back the House and keep the Senate. I personally am a fan of divided government.

Me too...we saw what havoc a pelosi unleashed and untethered could do
 
Let us assume that if Romney wins in 2012 that the GOP also takes the Senate and holds the House. The big question then becomes will Washington DC be a rerun of what has happened in states such as Wisconsin, Michigan and others where they not have one party rule? Would the Republicans use their majorities to introduce wide ranging and sweeping changes repealing much of the last 80 years of progressive reform?

And if they would do that, what would be the position of Romney in terms of signing such right wing legislation? The possiblity for harm is great.

I think it would be great and it would be "fair." After all, Obama and the Dems had both Houses and they acted on their extreme leftwing agenda. Equal opportunity and "fairness" says that it should be the rightwing's time. Oh, it would be so sweet if they actually did enact their agenda. Oh, this site would just sizzle! Heeheeeeeeeeeeeeee!
 
Let us assume that if Romney wins in 2012 that the GOP also takes the Senate and holds the House. The big question then becomes will Washington DC be a rerun of what has happened in states such as Wisconsin, Michigan and others where they not have one party rule? Would the Republicans use their majorities to introduce wide ranging and sweeping changes repealing much of the last 80 years of progressive reform?

And if they would do that, what would be the position of Romney in terms of signing such right wing legislation? The possiblity for harm is great.

Hard for anyone to conclude that Romney is anything but a moderate. How else would he have been elected as governor of mass. My sense is that he would work with congress before legislation is written and made sure it was not over the top.

Let's remember that we he was what, co-founder of one of the great consultant groups in America. You don't do that while lurching wildly to one side or the other.
 
Hard for anyone to conclude that Romney is anything but a moderate. How else would he have been elected as governor of mass. My sense is that he would work with congress before legislation is written and made sure it was not over the top.

Let's remember that we he was what, co-founder of one of the great consultant groups in America. You don't do that while lurching wildly to one side or the other.

Im not sure that what romney himself is or what he wants would be that relevant with a gop controlled house and senate...I think they would push him to the right
 
Im not sure that what romney himself is or what he wants would be that relevant with a gop controlled house and senate...I think they would push him to the right

I doubt that we would be in the position we are now in if there was room for real compromise. Both parties in congress make it clear that nothing rational will come out of there. Thus we need a president who will be a true leader, not a partisan. It is depressing that our current president has chosen to be on the campaign trail for the next 14 months and has given up on the idea of governing. I guess the American public is getting what they deserved for voting this guy in, but this is just to painful.
 
I think it would be great and it would be "fair." After all, Obama and the Dems had both Houses and they acted on their extreme leftwing agenda. Equal opportunity and "fairness" says that it should be the rightwing's time. Oh, it would be so sweet if they actually did enact their agenda. Oh, this site would just sizzle! Heeheeeeeeeeeeeeee!

And if your extremist dreams come true, there may be a whole lot more "sizzling" than just on message boards.
 
that's it?.. those paltry numbers are those who believe Romney and Cain are qualified to be President?


it should be 100% for each.

I mean the qualifications are quite simple.... 35 years old, citizen, lived in the US for 14 years, and doesn't already have 2 terms as El Presidente.


yup, both Qualify.... no doubt about it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom