- Joined
- Sep 28, 2005
- Messages
- 23,463
- Reaction score
- 7,252
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I tried to listen. I could not understand her.
I hope she is defeated in the very next election.
Me too..... I'll do my part.
I tried to listen. I could not understand her.
I hope she is defeated in the very next election.
I have a dollar in my pocket. Did I just create a job? Of course not.Which is just spin to deny that you are actually wrong. Without demand there are no jobs. You cannot change this fact.
Moderator's Warning: |
There's a thread in the Polls section discussing this very topic. Take the line of conversation there and lets stick to the narrow focus of the topic regarding the governors recommendation |
Demand creates opportunity. Unless you can prove General Dynamics was set up, run and administered by the Government, guess what? All you have is a company that caters too a client, the client doesn't create the jobs. The company does.
I would like to meet the idiotic conservative who came up with this retarded meme. Tell that to, for example, General Dynamics and watch them laugh at you.
No, General Dynamics exists because private individuals put together a company, that found a market in providing for the US Military. Government didn't set up the company, Government didn't invest the capital to make it happen. GOVERNMENT didn't create the jobs. This is your fail Redress.
A company that wouldn't hire as many employees if their client wasn't the government.
I'd say she followed a few of our threads (and some of my ideas). House elections every two years are a tremendous waste. The consitution ought to be changed. Her failing isnt her comment (which people are free to have an honest disagreement about) but rather her punk-ass bailout on the comments, pretending...ooops...tee hee...I was just joking...sooooorrrrrryyyyyy...She does have a point.
Congress is going to do what voters want them to do, especially during an election year.
When voters don't have a good understanding of the fundamental problems a government is creating, that spells all kinds of trouble.
Mr. V does not understand the concept of demand as evident by his posts. He apparently thinks that firms will create jobs in the absence of demand. Therefore, government cannot create jobs because the demand it creates is irrelevant to the function of firms hiring.
I did enjoy that job Ditto made about Mr. V being the Sarah Palin of this forum. So true.
I'd say she followed a few of our threads (and some of my ideas). House elections every two years are a tremendous waste. The consitution ought to be changed. Her failing isnt her comment (which people are free to have an honest disagreement about) but rather her punk-ass bailout on the comments, pretending...ooops...tee hee...I was just joking...sooooorrrrrryyyyyy...
You mean like the single-payer healthcare system that didn't get passed in Congress?
Or the high-speed rail bill that hasn't been passed?
Or the legislation to fix the bridges, roads, and highways we already have that hasn't been passed either?
Please explain how Obama's policies have been an utter failure when Congress refuses to implement them.
And this is what's WRNG with people like her. Government doesn't create jobs. Didn't the utter failure of the last few years of Obama's heavy push for "government stimulated" economy make that abundantly clear? And the concept of "suspending elections, just for a little bit..." What an atrociously BAD idea.
Senators serve 6 year terms and most holding those offices are no more productive than the clowns in the House. As a matter of fact they are much worse. Reid and company haven't passed a budget in over 900 days. If we really wanted to reform DC we would limit the legislative calendar to three weeks. After four weeks the Senate and House office buildings are locked up and the political elites are told to go home and live with their constituents.