• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breitbart: We have the guns

:lamo

So stupid it had to be repeated...

you are denying millions have been murdered by authoritarian governments over the last 100 years?
 
:lamoSo stupid it had to be repeated...
Redress... I can understand the mistake of calling Hitler a leftist, but do you deny that the communists were leftist? Either we're going to play the left/right game for the stains of our history, or we're not going to do it at all. What say you, Redress? Are you going to break the mold?
 
Redress... I can understand the mistake of calling Hitler a leftist, but do you deny that the communists were leftist? Either we're going to play the left/right game for the stains of our history, or we're not going to do it at all. What say you, Redress? Are you going to break the mold?

I pointed out the flaws in an earlier post.
 
Wait, which side is saying "We have the guns, and we might shoot you?"
Out of context.

The liberals are the bullies. If they cross over the line, if they take the first shot, we will win. Did you not watch the piece?
 
National Socialist Democratic Party? NAZI? Heil Hitler. What is in a name after all?
Totalitarianism comes in many forms.

We have had this argument on the board many times. The reality is that the Nazi party took aspects of left and right ideology, basically whatever worked best for what Hitler wanted.
 
OK, maybe I misunderstood, anyway, moving on...

Yes, I agree with retaining the option. However, my point is, that even the mere option should only be raised if government becomes oppressive on a routine basis, becomes a dictatorship, or something of that nature. Mere policy disagreements over a few % of tax rates or the proper rules for abortion is far from that dire situation and is instead the type of policy discussion any mature and civilized society would and should be having (preferably with more give and take on both sides, but welcome to the immediate gratification culture), meaning that as we are right now, even making a point such as "We have guns" without just cause to make this sort of threat does nothing to promote ones cause and also make them look like a bully or someone who will force their views on you, by direct force if necessary, instead of by the ballot box, thus becoming the thing they claim that they are defending against.

Did it help him make his point? No, of course not.
 
Did it help him make his point? No, of course not.

And thus my comment that it makes him look like an extortionist than a legitimate political figure.
 
And yet some liberal retards crow loudly about the coming 'revolution'...THATS better...

So you make a post doing nothing but calling liberals retards and you get three thumbs up votes. Interesting.
 
And thus my comment that it makes him look like an extortionist than a legitimate political figure.

I never knew he was a political figure. He's a bloggist.
 
I never knew he was a political figure. He's a bloggist.

He is in terms of being a thought leader. Just like Rush Limbaugh is a political figure.
 
Leftwingnut tree-hugger extremists notwithstanding, (as there just as few of them as there are rightwingnut extremists) I can safely say that amongst my friends, both liberal and conservative, I do not see any marked difference in the amount of guns one side has over the other.

PLENTY of liberals own guns and staunchly defend their right to do so. To think otherwise, simply because of a handful blowhard lefties, if just about as stupid as saying that the Teabaggers are in the majority of anything.

Does anybody want to come over and try to break into THIS liberal's house thinking I am unarmed? I wish you would try. :) I am waiting for that day to come.
Your comments are moronic. No right winger is THREATENING to come break into your house. The morons on the left are gleefully hoping for the prospect of a revolution and Those mobs like you saw in London? Those assholes would be the ones trying to light your world on fire. You ready to light THEM up? Keep your powder dry, hero.
 
So you make a post doing nothing but calling liberals retards and you get three thumbs up votes. Interesting.
Not 'liberals'...just the liberal retards that think revolution is a good idea. Are you one of those retards?
 
This is another liberal-leaning household with CC permits and plenty of firearms. Outlets like Fox and talk-radio have convinced many on the right that liberal voters want to take their guns away. That is poppycock. Liberals have guns too.
 
Last edited:
This is another liberal-leaning household with CC permits and plenty of firearms. Outlets like Fox and talk-radio have convinced many on the right that liberal voters want to take their guns away. That poppycock. Liberals have guns too.

if the permit wasn't soo expensive I'd have one.
 
Not 'liberals'...just the liberal retards that think revolution is a good idea. Are you one of those retards?

Why? Are you suspicious of me?
 
Moderator's Warning:
Threads merged.
 
if the permit wasn't soo expensive I'd have one.

Practically everyone I know has a gun. None of them have a permit. You do not need a permit to own a gun. So which one are thinking about getting?
 
Back
Top Bottom