• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anders Behring Breivik is a Illuminati-Freemason

Alfons

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
3,300
Reaction score
244
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
The crazy guy who bombed in Norway is a Freemason, it is the best evidence that Freemasonry has nothing in common with Christianity, rather with Devil. Interesting what will be happen, it is difficult to believe that Police will investigate against Freemasons loges.
In any case Christians must condemn any kind of violence and Freemasonry as Devil's Teaching.

The alleged offender is a member of the John lodge St. Olaus TD Three pillars of the Norwegian Masonic Order. He has 3 degree status, where the peak is ten degrees. – We have no way to express an opinion on individuals or incidents related to any members, said spokesman of the Norwegian Freemasons order Helge Qvigstad told Dagbladet. On a Facebook profile appears to be 32-year-old Christian and politically conservative. As favorite books provide the man behind the profile including George Orwell’s “1984″ and Kafka’s “process”.

Illuminati-Freemason Mind Controled Slave Anders Behring Breivik Identified As Suspect In Norway Shooting*|*Truth Frequency News

article-2017709-0D1F33FB00000578-704_306x512.jpg
 
Last edited:
:lamo Yeah, I'm sure it's not just he's a nutjob, it must be because of some organisation he affiliates with.
 
I had a look at Alex Jone's website earlier. The conspiracy people's reaction to this would be hilarious if the situation weren't so ****ed up.
 
:lamo Yeah, I'm sure it's not just he's a nutjob, it must be because of some organisation he affiliates with.

No one Conservative can approve Violence and Terrorism, it is a Provocation for discrediting of Christians and Conservatives. The Police should investigate by leftist and Freemasons who are probably behind this idiot.
 
I had a look at Alex Jone's website earlier. The conspiracy people's reaction to this would be hilarious if the situation weren't so ****ed up.


Why conspiracy?

It is well-known that Freemasons are everywhere, the medias must say that Idiot Breivik is not a "Christian Fundamentalist" but a FREEMASON!
 
No one Conservative can approve Violence and Terrorism, it is a Provocation for discrediting of Christians and Conservatives. The Police should investigate by leftist and Freemasons who are probably behind this idiot.

Yeah, conservatives don't use violence and terror, except, you know, for all those ultra-conservative Muslims. :lol:
 
Yeah, conservatives don't use violence and terror, except, you know, for all those ultra-conservative Muslims. :lol:

Any bets on how fast this is moved to conspiracy theories?
 
The crazy guy who bombed in Norway is a Freemason, it is the best evidence that Freemasonry has nothing in common with Christianity, rather with Devil. Interesting what will be happen, it is difficult to believe that Police will investigate against Freemasons loges.
In any case Christians must condemn any kind of violence and Freemasonry as Devil's Teaching.

Interesting.

When you think it is an Islamist who bombed the country then that means all Muslims are bad and it isn't just one extremist nutjob in the religion.

When you think it is a fundamentalist, right wing Christian who bombed the country it doesn't mean all Christians are bad, that individual was just an extremist nutjob.

And now it is all Freemasons are bad. You just love painting every group other than your own as entirely evil.
 
Last edited:
What do you make of this Alfons?

The problem is that it often does not help about 80% of Muslims are "moderates", ie they ignore the Quran. "It takes very few people to overthrow a plane."

What percentage is the Taliban of Pakistan's population? 1%, 3%, 5%? And how much chaos is there today?

In every society where Islam exists there will be a certain percentage of the Muslims who actually follow the traditional interpretations of the Koran.

And then we have the relationship between conservative Muslims and so-called "moderate Muslims".

There is moderate Nazis, too, that does not support fumigation of rooms and Jews. But they're still Nazis and will only sit and watch as the conservatives Nazis strike (if it ever happens). If we accept the moderate Nazis as long as they distance themselves from the fumigation of rooms and Jews?

Now it unfortunately already cut himself with Marxists who have already infiltrated-culture, media and educational organizations. These individuals will be tolerated and will even work as professors and lecturers at colleges / universities and are thus able to spread their propaganda.

For me it is very hypocritical to treat Muslims, Nazis and Marxists differ. They are all supporters of hate-ideologies. Not all Muslims, Nazis and Marxists are conservative, most are moderate. But does it matter? A moderate Nazi might, after having experienced fraud, choose to be conservative. A moderate Muslim can, after being refused to enter a club, be conservative, etc.

It is obvious that the moderate supporters of hate-ideologies, at a later date may choose conservatism.

Islam (ism) has historically led to 300 million deaths
Communism has historically led to 100 million deaths
Nazism has historically led to 6-20 million deaths

ALL hate ideologies should be treated equally.​
 
Why conspiracy?

It is well-known that Freemasons are everywhere, the medias must say that Idiot Breivik is not a "Christian Fundamentalist" but a FREEMASON!

My grandpa was a Freemason , and I don't believe it's a religion itself. He could be both a Freemason and a fundamental Christian.
 
I take issue with everyone who said Conservatives never use violence. Want to look at history? Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, the leaders Islamic Revolution in Iran, Pinochet,conservative Muslim jihadists, and that's just the ones I can think of off the top of my head in the last century. Has the left used violence before? Yes there it is completely ignorant to deny that just as it is completely ignorant to say the right does not use violence and terror. However, one of the leaders of the Russian Revolution Leon Trotsky openly condemned the use of terror in this essay: Leon Trotsky: Terrorism (1911)
 
I take issue with everyone who said Conservatives never use violence. Want to look at history? Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, the leaders Islamic Revolution in Iran, Pinochet,conservative Muslim jihadists, and that's just the ones I can think of off the top of my head in the last century. Has the left used violence before? Yes there it is completely ignorant to deny that just as it is completely ignorant to say the right does not use violence and terror. However, one of the leaders of the Russian Revolution Leon Trotsky openly condemned the use of terror in this essay: Leon Trotsky: Terrorism (1911)

Huh, it's almost as if people are individuals rather than a collective hive mind based on their particular ideology, and that those individuals may make their own choice to use violence or not use violence!
 
I take issue with everyone who said Conservatives never use violence. Want to look at history? Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, the leaders Islamic Revolution in Iran, Pinochet,conservative Muslim jihadists, and that's just the ones I can think of off the top of my head in the last century. Has the left used violence before? Yes there it is completely ignorant to deny that just as it is completely ignorant to say the right does not use violence and terror. However, one of the leaders of the Russian Revolution Leon Trotsky openly condemned the use of terror in this essay: Leon Trotsky: Terrorism (1911)
To be fair, I am sure he meant to say "no true conservative" so that pretty much rules out anyone who has used terrorism.
 
I assure you that in general, Masonry is much more bland and boring than it's detractors make it out to be. Not that I think there have been no instances of people in a lodge getting together and taking action in various nefarious ways, but just that tying that sort of activity to Freemasonry as a whole is about as useful as other sorts of generalizations about a group based on a few members.
 
My grandpa was a Freemason , and I don't believe it's a religion itself. He could be both a Freemason and a fundamental Christian.

Only Christians can be Masons. It's a pre-req.
 
I take issue with everyone who said Conservatives never use violence. Want to look at history? Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, the leaders Islamic Revolution in Iran, Pinochet,conservative Muslim jihadists, and that's just the ones I can think of off the top of my head in the last century. Has the left used violence before? Yes there it is completely ignorant to deny that just as it is completely ignorant to say the right does not use violence and terror. However, one of the leaders of the Russian Revolution Leon Trotsky openly condemned the use of terror in this essay: Leon Trotsky: Terrorism (1911)

All those cats were Leftists. Nice try as painting all Conservatives as mas murderers, though. Too bad history isn't on your side.
 
Only Christians can be Masons. It's a pre-req.
I thought it was more akin to the Boy Scouts in that one just needs to have a belief in God, but not necessarily be a Christian.
 
Why conspiracy?

It is well-known that Freemasons are everywhere, the medias must say that Idiot Breivik is not a "Christian Fundamentalist" but a FREEMASON!

Freemasons are not all Christians first of all - they only have to believe in a higher power. You're doing exatly what the other knee jerk reactionaries are doing and that is: OH LOOK LOOK!! HE'S A CHRISTIAN TERROR... NO, LOOK LOOK HE'S A FREEMASON TERRORIST!!

Non of his affiliations at this point are shown to have:
a.) driven him to carry out this act
b.) been shown to influence the act

As far as we know now, he's not part of some organized group but was alone or possibly had help from others. We'll see soon enough what made this guy snap.
 
The crazy guy who bombed in Norway is a Freemason, it is the best evidence that Freemasonry has nothing in common with Christianity, rather with Devil. Interesting what will be happen, it is difficult to believe that Police will investigate against Freemasons loges.
In any case Christians must condemn any kind of violence and Freemasonry as Devil's Teaching.



Illuminati-Freemason Mind Controled Slave Anders Behring Breivik Identified As Suspect In Norway Shooting*|*Truth Frequency News

article-2017709-0D1F33FB00000578-704_306x512.jpg


George Washington was a Freemason
My Godfather is a free mason and a devout Episcopalian

lots of the Nazis claimed to be devout catholics or Lutherans

and of course Queen Isabella who sponsored the Inquisition was given title of DEFENDER OF THE FAITH by the Pope IIRC
 
Only Christians can be Masons. It's a pre-req.

This is NOT true.

Prerequisits to be a Mason:

* You must be a man of at least 21 years of age.
* You must be of good moral character and have 3 people willing to vouch for this character.
* You must believe in a surpreme being, a deity, not that the fraternity is a religion but that you have a steadfast belief in your faith.
https://newjerseygrandlodge.org/static/become


My lodge has 2 Jews, a majority of Christians (Catholics and Protestants by the way) 1 Hindu. Not sure about the rest actually but there is NO Christianity requirement. Please don't talk out of school if you don't 100% know or are a mason. This is exactly what gives Masons a bad name when misinformation and bad information are relegated as fact by those who do not know.
 
I take issue with everyone who said Conservatives never use violence. Want to look at history? Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, the leaders Islamic Revolution in Iran, Pinochet,conservative Muslim jihadists, and that's just the ones I can think of off the top of my head in the last century. Has the left used violence before? Yes there it is completely ignorant to deny that just as it is completely ignorant to say the right does not use violence and terror. However, one of the leaders of the Russian Revolution Leon Trotsky openly condemned the use of terror in this essay: Leon Trotsky: Terrorism (1911)

violence tends to be part and parcel of authoritarian collectivist regimes. fascists, trotskyites, marxists, shining path, maoists, nazis, stalinists might have different names but the end results tend to be about the same
 
I thought it was more akin to the Boy Scouts in that one just needs to have a belief in God, but not necessarily be a Christian.

Yeah...God...the Christian God.

That's what the, "G", in the Masonic symbol represents.
 
This is NOT true.

Prerequisits to be a Mason:

* You must be a man of at least 21 years of age.
* You must be of good moral character and have 3 people willing to vouch for this character.
* You must believe in a surpreme being, a deity, not that the fraternity is a religion but that you have a steadfast belief in your faith.
https://newjerseygrandlodge.org/static/become


My lodge has 2 Jews, a majority of Christians (Catholics and Protestants by the way) 1 Hindu. Not sure about the rest actually but there is NO Christianity requirement. Please don't talk out of school if you don't 100% know or are a mason. This is exactly what gives Masons a bad name when misinformation and bad information are relegated as fact by those who do not know.

When I became a Mason I distinctly remember being asked if I were a Christian. The question in on the application.
 
When I became a Mason I distinctly remember being asked if I were a Christian. The question in on the application.

If you said no they probably would have said well do you believe in one true God and that would have been it. I too know Jewish Free masons and a fellow whose family were followers of Ba'hai I knew in HS was the son of a freemason
 
violence tends to be part and parcel of authoritarian collectivist regimes. fascists, trotskyites, marxists, shining path, maoists, nazis, stalinists might have different names but the end results tend to be about the same
First of all there has never been a Trotskyst regime in existence so we can take that out. Fascists are considered by historians and political scientists to be conservatives as are Nazis. So how about this I'll admit that Mao and Stalin were leftists and were murderous scum who needed to be overthrown and that my side does hold responisbiy for them, but you need to admit that the Right has claim to Fascism, Nazism,radical religious extremism(which has killed far more than anything else in history)
 
Back
Top Bottom