- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 8,713
- Reaction score
- 1,907
- Location
- The Derby City
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Glad to see you can't even understand a simple one sentence post.
Yep, followed your lead.
Glad to see you can't even understand a simple one sentence post.
Yep, followed your lead.
The "I'm runner you're glue" tactic!! No wonder your arguments were so childish and ignorant
That's pretty funny coming from someone that posts something, then denies it 30 minutes later.
But I'm through playing your silly games. You can go back to your pizza in mom's basement now.
How many of those freshman congress critters protested the other umpteen times we've raised the debt ceiling?
Yes. His core principles are Marx-inspired. He is intentionally damaging the free market system, using the instruments of government against the nation's people and its businesses.Do you really think Obama is a Marxist? If so, you must 1) Not know what a Marxist is, or 2) Not realize that Obama is a business-as-usual American politician. I mean, Goldman Sachs was his #1 contributor for crying out loud! Are they Marxist too? Read some Marx... please.
This is the mark of a low class hypocrite.No, I don't. But I support politicians who would impose higher tax rates uniformly. Paying higher taxes by myself would accomplish nothing.
You have no clue about taxes do you?Good for her! She must be making well into six figures to be paying at that rate. A lot of people would would be happy to suffer that kind of slavery.
This is the mark of a low class hypocrite.
You have no clue about taxes do you?
Whatever. It is true, nevertheless.That was an ad hom fallacy
Whatever. It is true, nevertheless.
A new poll by CBS News shows a majority of Americans - Democrat, Independent and Republican - prefer a combination of spending cuts and tax increases as part of a deal to raise the debt ceiling. SO, when is the GOP going to catch up?
No problem on a couple conditions, explain the following to me
Why did Democrats agree to $1 in tax increases for every $3 in spending cuts during the GHW Bush Administration and then renege on the spending cuts?
Explain to me how tax increases put 25 million unemployed or under employed Americans back to work full time paying full taxes?
Who pays those tax increases and does that change the 70 million income earning Americans who pay zero in Federal Income taxes forcing them to pay something?
Answer those to my satisfaction and I will agree with tax increases
At the end of the day we must pay our bills. So if the country elects a congress that wants to spend $3.8 trillion, then we should also have a congress that finds a way to pay for that. Perhaps the best way to curb spending is to insure that we have to cover that spending with taxes.
You would think that people could connect the dots on what is happening between our states. texas which is business and tax friendly has grown jobs, while my state of CT continues to raise taxes and suffer. People and companies have a choice on where they locate. The same is true with the Federal government. How much of mess would it be if corporate headquarters moved out of the country or if rich folks moved their residences outside the U.S.
New debt ceiling deal (8/2/2011)
The debt ceiling negotiation reveals one truth, that this nation is controlled by a covert dictatorship which represents the interest of a rich people group, and the so said law makers don't represent the voters any more.
1. The tax cut law was proposed and carried out by former present Bush. It is proved being a failed policy. In Bush's eight years term, the national debt raised from 6 trillian to 12 trillian. His tax cut law contributes big in debt increasing. Yet, when Obama wanted to recover the tax rate on rich people, the law makers resisted. It proves they are now working for a little group of rich people not for the majority of Americans.
2. War in Iraq and in Afghanistan is another factor to the deficit of the budget. US military expense and war expense add together almost equal to the total expense of all other countries in this world. That's an extra heavy burden of the American tax payers. The strange thing is nobody dares to speak out. No media, no politician dares to finger at it. It's another proof the US has become a covert dictatorship. In it media and politicians all are controlled by the Inside group. They no longer are the voice of people.
3. The victim of the new balance deal will be the American people. More people will lose their jobs and welfare aid in new budget. They will have less money to spend. How could economy recover in this foundation? The economy of US will continue remain in stagnation if not going worse.
4. The result of today's situation is people can't elect their own representatives. The government insiders have controlled the intelligence and the media. They select politicians of their own through rigged election. (because they control the intelligence) They justify the election result through the fake poll of the media.
Yet with the exception of 2008 and 2001-2002 Federal Tax revenue grew after the complete execution of the Bush tax cuts. How do you explain it. You buy the liberal rhetoric yet ignore the actual results.
It's explained by the growth in GDP due to Clintons policies which created 22 million new jobs and 22 million new taxpayers. The reason we have a deficit now is due to bush*'s job destruction program, fueled by tax cuts and runaway spending.
Notice you never talk about the dot.com bubble bursting nor the fact that Clinton economic policies led to the Republicans taking over Congress in the 1994 elections. how convenient
It's explained by the growth in GDP due to Clintons policies which created 22 million new jobs and 22 million new taxpayers. The reason we have a deficit now is due to bush*'s job destruction program, fueled by tax cuts and runaway spending.
. . . it is more accurate to say that the economy in the 1990s continued growing strong despite the tax increases! In fact, the economy was strong enough before Congress voted on the tax bill that it was able to digest the tax increases which were signed August 10, 1993. Let's look at the numbers as to how things were following the downturn of two decades ago.
The economy was out of recession in March of 1991. This is em, er...before Clinton announced in October of that year that he was running for president, and almost two and a half years before President Clinton signed his tax law.
In the twelve months leading up to the tax signing (August 1992-July 1993), the economy gained 2,023,000 jobs, which is 168,000 jobs per month. To put things into perspective: in the four years during which Democrats recently controlled Congress, we did not have a twelve-month period where the economy gained 100,000 jobs on a monthly average, let alone 168,000 to meet an economy of fifteen years earlier.
In the six months (February-July 1993) leading up to the tax signing, the monthly average job gain was already 208,000, which shows that the economy was growing stronger by the month, well before the bill was signed.
The unemployment rate peaked July 1992 -- more than six months before Clinton stepped into the Oval Office, and more than twelve months before Congress voted on the tax bill. In fact, the rate lost almost a full percentage point in the twelve months leading up to the tax signing.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average reached a low (of less than 2,400) in October 1990, and then things turned around, which is em...say...three years before your Clinton taxes "gave us" a good economy!
From its recession low of minus 2,400, the Dow grew almost 50% to approximately 3,600 before we got to August 1993. This amounts to a 16% annual gain if any Dem had his/her money in an Index fund piggybacked to the Dow.
Agreed. He is a Marxist. And a Democrat. Spread the wealth....And there are no communists here. Not Obama, not anyone. That kind of talk marks someone as a nutter, an unorignal nutter.
And Marxism (and communism) have always had their useful idiots to help move history along...Pretty much. Never underestimate the human ability to make anything souond like something else. I just wish those who did this were more original. These type of scare tatics are as old as the union.
Sometimes his teleprompter does...If Obama said it, it must be true because everyone knows that Obama never lies, right apdst?
Your metaphor fails you.Yes, when my familys' bill exceed our income, the first thing I do is work fewer hours for less pay. Isn't that what every family does? :roll: