• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Administration to propose steps on gun safety

apdst

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
133,631
Reaction score
30,937
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
This must be that under the radar stuff that The Messiah told Sarah Brady about.

Spokesman Jay Carney said that the new steps would be made public "in the near future." He didn't offer details, but people involved in talks at the Justice Department to craft the new measures said they expected to see something in the next several weeks. Whatever is proposed is not expected to involve legislation or take on major issues like banning assault weapons but could include executive action to strengthen the background check system or other steps.

Administration to propose steps on gun safety - USATODAY.com
 
Yes, I too tell reporters about stuff I want to keep quiet.
 
Yes, I too tell reporters about stuff I want to keep quiet.

Why on earth would the president want to keep it quiet, when he's ****ing with our constitutional rights?

Things that make you go...hmm!
 
Why on earth would the president want to keep it quiet, when he's ****ing with our constitutional rights?

Things that make you go...hmm!

You're the one who said something about "under the radar."
 
You're the one who said something about "under the radar."

No, Obama said that. Now we see part of what he was talking about.
 
How can we take Obama or any of his disciples seriously when it was on their watch that about 2,000 assault weapons were sold to Gun Cartels and one was used to kill a Border Patrol Agent?

Any gun control will mean a jump in crime, it happens every time.

Since when have criminals obeyed any laws regarding guns or anything else.

I am beginning to believe that Liberals like ABM have a mental disorder.
 
No, Obama said that. Now we see part of what he was talking about.

But if this is the part that's supposed to be under the radar (which YOU said), it wouldn't make any sense to just tell reporters about it.

You are the one that thinks that THIS PROPOSAL is supposed to be the "under the radar" part, yet it's information being publicly distributed. Maybe you and I have a different definition of "under the radar."
 
But if this is the part that's supposed to be under the radar (which YOU said), it wouldn't make any sense to just tell reporters about it.

You are the one that thinks that THIS PROPOSAL is supposed to be the "under the radar" part, yet it's information being publicly distributed. Maybe you and I have a different definition of "under the radar."

What's he going to do? Did they give us any details on what the plan is?
 
What's he going to do? Did they give us any details on what the plan is?

They said details would be released when they're finalized. Why would they tell you this at all if the plan was to keep it hidden?
 
They said details would be released when they're finalized. Why would they tell you this at all if the plan was to keep it hidden?

Why not go ahead and tell us exactly how they intend to assault our constitutional rights?
 
I'll need to know exactly what they plan to do, in detail, before I know whether I need to oppose it or not.

However, as a general rule, I am dubious about such things, especially when done without Congressional input.
 
I'll need to know exactly what they plan to do, in detail, before I know whether I need to oppose it or not.

However, as a general rule, I am dubious about such things, especially when done without Congressional input.

Exactly! It's, like...our right to know and stuff.
 
Exactly! It's, like...our right to know and stuff.

I doubt the Obama admin will be able to take a swipe at the 2nd amendment without us knowing about it, so I wouldn't go into panic mode yet. Plus, with the previous hand gun ruling by SCOTUS, we know that the rights are protected from even tiny infringements at the Federal courts level. It's the individual States that seem to vary.

Let's wait to hear what this is about before we jump to conclusions, shall we?
 
Why not go ahead and tell us exactly how they intend to assault our constitutional rights?

Why ask a question when you've already decided the answer?

Ask a real question like an adult and you'll get a real answer like an adult.
 
I doubt the Obama admin will be able to take a swipe at the 2nd amendment without us knowing about it, so I wouldn't go into panic mode yet.

Denial and the executive order is the Libbos best friend. Yes?


Plus, with the previous hand gun ruling by SCOTUS, we know that the rights are protected from even tiny infringements at the Federal courts level. It's the individual States that seem to vary.

I doubt Obama is worried about what the law has to say on the subject.

Let's wait to hear what this is about before we jump to conclusions, shall we?

How about we nip it in the bud, now, then there's nothing to worry about.
 
Why ask a question when you've already decided the answer?

Ask a real question like an adult and you'll get a real answer like an adult.

Not from you, I won't. ;)
 
Moderator's Warning:
ENOUGH with the 3rd grade debating crap. Discuss the topic reasonably or don't post.
 
Back
Top Bottom