Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5131415
Results 141 to 143 of 143

Thread: Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job

  1. #141
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:28 AM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,713
    Blog Entries
    12

    Re: Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    Do you reject that the argument given in the OP stated that the calculated number stopped with the saved/created job?

    Granted, I realize you don't have a grasp of logic, but try.



    Cute. Your article flatly states that the calculation ends with the saved/created job. This explicitly argues that there was nothing else included in the calculation. It completely ignores that those who had their job saved or created did not have their incomes taxed, nor spent any money. Go ahead and try to disprove this. You can't. All you are going to do is throw out unprovable assertions I'm putting words in your mouth. You are completely incapable of showing how my logic is in any way wrong. You won't even TRY to refute the argument I'm giving. You will merely try to insult me.

    See, I stated this "let's see. The cost per job directly states it ends at the saved job alone. That explicitly argues that multipliers were not applied in the calculation. You will not have response to this because you cannot refute the logic I use. Hence why you always fall back on "he's dishonest!" Absolutely nothing I stated is what you make it out to be. If it was, you could show that the logic within the argument you posted taken to its conclusion is not what I argued. But you cannot. Nor will you even try." to which you had nothing but personal insults, which I am reporting you for. I predicted you could not deal with the logic I gave and look what you did? You didn't even try to do it.



    Enjoy your warning.



    Did I defend him? I merely pointed out the calculation is stupid because it ignores multipliers.



    Failure to disclaim an article you post is admission that it is your argument. You should have learned this day one.



    Try to fail less in your response. and actually do something other then personal insults.
    You enjoy hitting the report button? ROTFLOL... the post was worth the points. It's in the public domain now, and you try this crap again, I'll simply link to it to remind all how you seem to have a penchant for ascribing words and arguments never uttered.

    You failed to read my posts yet again, and are still trying to stuff words in my mouth never uttered. I will not defend a premise that is false at its core. It's not my argument, it's your attempt, yet again to have someone defend a position never uttered but ascribed to by you. You really should try to cure yourself of this most unfortunate habit, for it makes you look moronic, and tremendously insecure in your ability to debate.

    You see, it's not Obama's job to steal wealth, run it through the government meat grinder and send of the remains to his pet constituents. I don't care how you want to slice and dice it. I know, a difficult concept for you to grasp, but give it a try.

    .
    Last edited by zimmer; 07-25-11 at 09:41 AM.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  2. #142
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    You enjoy hitting the report button? ROTFLOL... the post was worth the points. It's in the public domain now, and you try this crap again, I'll simply link to it to remind all how you seem to have a penchant for ascribing words and arguments never uttered.

    You failed to read my posts yet again, and are still trying to stuff words in my mouth never uttered. I will not defend a premise that is false at its core. It's not my argument, it's your attempt, yet again to have someone defend a position never uttered but ascribed to by you. You really should try to cure yourself of this most unfortunate habit, for it makes you look moronic, and tremendously insecure in your ability to debate.

    You see, it's not Obama's job to steal wealth, run it through the government meat grinder and send of the remains to his pet constituents. I don't care how you want to slice and dice it. I know, a difficult concept for you to grasp, but give it a try.

    .
    Oh look. I predict you will not even attempt to rebut the logical argument I gave and resort to personal attacks....and what do you do? Run away from refuting my logical arguments and then resort to personal attacks.

    Really, people are going to think we're in cahoots. I say it here and it comes out on your end.

    You didn't even try. Exactly as I predicted.

    I realize you don't care about appearing credible to anyone, but acting down to the letter as your opponent predicted is not a way to come off looking good
    Last edited by obvious Child; 07-26-11 at 03:29 AM.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  3. #143
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:28 AM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,713
    Blog Entries
    12

    Re: Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    Oh look. I predict you will not even attempt to rebut the logical argument I gave and resort to personal attacks....and what do you do? Run away from refuting my logical arguments and then resort to personal attacks.

    Really, people are going to think we're in cahoots. I say it here and it comes out on your end.

    You didn't even try. Exactly as I predicted.

    I realize you don't care about appearing credible to anyone, but acting down to the letter as your opponent predicted is not a way to come off looking good
    You are thick.

    I answered the question long ago. I don't accept the premise you ascribed to me... pure and simple, and defeated your attempt with a very concise point (perhaps you just failed to understand), which makes your attempt to assign me your argument and follow-up jawboning 100% moot.

    Like I said, you try to ascribe a position to others, deceitfully as always. Your argument was DOA and I explained why long ago. But, you just keep on trying.

    This reminds me of the time you went on a rant about taxes, only to blow up your own argument at the very end of your initial post, by calling the masses of people stupid. You shot yourself in the face, I didn't have to do anything but point out your hilariously tragic logic... but you being you... just kept on trying. It reminds me of your attempt to tell me how autobahns work, using Bremen as a laughable example. That and your defense of shoebox/deathtrap cars. Fail. Fail, Fail, Fail. Four strikes and you're out.

    Perhaps one day you'll score a hit (bring a lighter). Perhaps, but as long as you elect to be deceitful in your manner, it ain't likely gonna happen.

    Now... pack up your deceit and take it elsewhere.

    .
    Last edited by zimmer; 07-27-11 at 08:07 PM.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5131415

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •