- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 24,380
- Reaction score
- 7,805
- Location
- Worldwide
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Phew. Prove that you put words in my mouth never uttered? Go back and read the OP and your response.Okay. Go and prove this. Try.
Here we have a third go. Like I said folks, he puts words in other people's mouths and then tells you to defend them. Are you a complete or partial retard? I guess partial because you can use a keyboard.Your constant inability to actually prove your argument much less how the concluded logic you declare "dishonest" is actually dishonest suggests you never were taught proper debate skills.
Now a forth go. Is it dementia or partial retardation? I'm not quite sure how to analyze this from a distance.Let's see. The cost per job directly states it ends at the saved job alone. That explicitly argues that multipliers were not applied in the calculation. You will not have response to this because you cannot refute the logic I use. Hence why you always fall back on "he's dishonest!" Absolutely nothing I stated is what you make it out to be. If it was, you could show that the logic within the argument you posted taken to its conclusion is not what I argued. But you cannot. Nor will you even try.
A fifth go.Good luck proving this. Especially after how I just dissected your tactic.
A sixth go. Trying to assign an argument never stated.The simple fact that you call logic "putting words in other's mouths" is not a sign of skill on your part.
Like Charles Manson, you're relentless.
Now... let's make it simple so even you can understand. I don't accept the premise of your argument or defense of Obama. His job isn't to siphon wealth from others, run it through the government meat grinder and send it out to his pet constituents. See... nothing remotely close to your attempt to ascribe a position to me. You didn't even hit the dart board, in fact you brained an audience member.
Now what argument are you going to ascribe this time Charlie?
5
4
3
2
1...
.