Let's see. The cost per job directly states it ends at the saved job alone. That explicitly argues that multipliers were not applied in the calculation. You will not have response to this because you cannot refute the logic I use. Hence why you always fall back on "he's dishonest!" Absolutely nothing I stated is what you make it out to be. If it was, you could show that the logic within the argument you posted taken to its conclusion is not what I argued. But you cannot. Nor will you even try.OC can't take the words at face value or ask what someone implied or their underlying meaning.
Good luck proving this. Especially after how I just dissected your tactic.Nope... he jumps right in a puts words in other people's mouths. It's a bad habit of his, that and his professional prevaricating while accusing others of it.
OC, it's time to clean up your pathetic act.
The simple fact that you call logic "putting words in other's mouths" is not a sign of skill on your part.