Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last Seen
    05-06-12 @ 11:12 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    9,800

  2. #2
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    Thanks for sharing this!

    Interesting aint it?


  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last Seen
    05-06-12 @ 11:12 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    9,800

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    It really is. I am one who was strongly believing he should step down, but I was looking at him in a vacuum, independent of what anybody else did or didn't "get away with". I now believe it should have been up to his constituents.

    And that idiot from Stern's show. Holy. What an embarrassment of an alleged human.

  4. #4
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    Quote Originally Posted by BDBoop View Post
    It really is. I am one who was strongly believing he should step down, but I was looking at him in a vacuum, independent of what anybody else did or didn't "get away with". I now believe it should have been up to his constituents.

    And that idiot from Stern's show. Holy. What an embarrassment of an alleged human.
    I personally think that Weiner should of not left congress but that is a whole other issue.
    But really the "liberal media" i personally think that the media is just the "shock media" what ever stories or reports grab the audiences attention the most and will boost their ratings (sad isnt it?).
    But hey that is Howard Stern for ya, the "shock jock"...


  5. #5
    Educator Helvidius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Good ol' US of A
    Last Seen
    02-01-17 @ 12:41 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    735

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    I'd leave it up the constituents. I think part of it is that Weiner initially lied about what happened. Obviously, he isn't facing perjury, but it just makes him look worse. Of course, the fact that he is asked to leave and Charlie Rangel still holds office really says a lot about politics in the United States....
    Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  6. #6
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    Damaged BECAUSE they wanted him to resign?

    I actually have a little bit better view of some democrats because of their response to Weiner (and others)
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last Seen
    05-06-12 @ 11:12 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    9,800

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    Damaged BECAUSE they wanted him to resign?

    I actually have a little bit better view of some democrats because of their response to Weiner (and others)
    Did you watch the video?

  8. #8
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    She's trying to blame the fact that people actually don't approve of his actions on the 'conservative media' (meaning fox news -seeing as how there's no one else in the 'conservative media' fur pile to speak of.) And this doesn't work for me or for many other people. Supposedly - according to her - people went from saying fox news wasn't a real media outlet at all to them (fox) having enough strength and umph that they've compelled their opposing party who hates them to force one of their own to resign . . . geesh man - how far fetched does it get with people like her?

    I think if they just take their response to him - and apply it to everyone else, regardless of party, who makes an ass out of their position in office (law breaking, drug dealing, unethical behavior, etc etc) then we'll be on the right path to a Congress I approve of.

    Maddow can suck it - as I always say - because I've yet to really hear her say anything I agree with.
    Last edited by Aunt Spiker; 06-19-11 at 08:26 PM.
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  9. #9
    Mod Conspiracy Theorist
    rocket88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    A very blue state
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:25 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,187

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    Quote Originally Posted by Helvidius View Post
    I'd leave it up the constituents. I think part of it is that Weiner initially lied about what happened. Obviously, he isn't facing perjury, but it just makes him look worse. Of course, the fact that he is asked to leave and Charlie Rangel still holds office really says a lot about politics in the United States....
    It's all about SEX!

    Sell arms to America's enemy? (like Reagan) -- Name an airport after him!
    Blow jobs? -- IMPEACH!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jetboogieman View Post
    This issue has been plowed more times than Paris Hilton.
    Quote Originally Posted by Oborosen View Post
    Too bad we have to observe human rights.

  10. #10
    pawn in the game of life
    pragmatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    10-17-17 @ 05:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,984

    Re: Rachel Maddow's Take on Weiner - Ouch

    Thought I read somewhere that Maddow hated the weiner....???



    .


    “Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.”

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •