• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DNC Chair: GOP wants to "Drag Us Back To Jim Crow Laws"

Eighty Deuce said:
Stupid **** don't fly here bro.

But seeing as the first black President is the biggest screw-up in the history of the Republic, that should provide enough fodder to call Conservatives "racists" well past the end of all our days. :)

Repeat after me: "One adult .... one vote"
Click to expand...

He isn't the first black President.
We haven't had one yet...

He is our first Mulatto President.
 
pbrauer said:
It obvious you don't believe in democracy. Show me a person who doesn't pay taxes of any kind.
Click to expand...

Lemme help you out here. With taxes that are common to all, explain to me the difference about who is in charge ?

But with such as income tax, where 47% or more don't pay a penny, and many get redistribution checks in the mail, do I really need to explain it to you ?

Is this another round of liberal denial ? Aren't you folks finally waking up to the fact that OPM is running out ?

HELLO !
 
Eighty Deuce said:
Stupid **** don't fly here bro.
Click to expand...

I've seen some pretty stupid **** around here and it definitely had wings.

But seeing as the first black President is the biggest screw-up in the history of the Republic,
Click to expand...

Except for people who have a grasp on reality.

that should provide enough fodder to call Conservatives "racists" well past the end of all our days. :)
Click to expand...

Oh don't worry, "conservatives", at least the quasi-conservatives who most rabidly claim that they are "conservative" seem to get wet at the idea of supplying more fodder.

Repeat after me: "One adult .... one vote"
Click to expand...

Yeah, because there's SOO much evidence of massive, systemic voter fraud that it's worth disenfranchising whole segments of the population.
 
toddwv said:
Yeah, because there's SOO much evidence of massive, systemic voter fraud that it's worth disenfranchising whole segments of the population.
Click to expand...

Can you show/demonstrate this "disenfranchising" of "whole segments" of the population?
 
toddwv said:
I've seen some pretty stupid **** around here and it definitely had wings.



Except for people who have a grasp on reality.



Oh don't worry, "conservatives", at least the quasi-conservatives who most rabidly claim that they are "conservative" seem to get wet at the idea of supplying more fodder.



Yeah, because there's SOO much evidence of massive, systemic voter fraud that it's worth disenfranchising whole segments of the population.
Click to expand...

This is soooooo funny ! Imagine having to be a registered voter, and needing ID, in order to VOTE !!!

"Oh the humanity" !!! All those disenfranchised zombies !!
 
Caine said:
He isn't the first black President.
We haven't had one yet...

He is our first Mulatto President.
Click to expand...

why am i not surprised you are from nc ... i bet rural nc, likely down east
 
This actually does have some merit. They are trying to make it harder in some cases for younger members of the population to vote by requiring more identification/stopping voting in college districts.

"Recent Republican proposals have or would put in place onerous voter ID requirements, curtail early voting, and prevent students from casting ballots where they go to school. These proposals are costly and could disenfranchise hundreds of thousands if not millions of voters, but most of those affected are more likely to vote for Democrats. Republicans have invoked the specter of voter fraud to justify the restrictions, but the type of voter fraud these laws are designed to address are extremely rare — the Bush administration, despite pursuing the issue vigorously, never produced more than a handful of voter fraud prosecutions."


More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...oting-proposals/2011/03/04/AGkeeBLH_blog.html

Man I seem to be finding myself defending this woman a lot :D
 
Like how libs bend over backwards to make it easy for our Military to vote. Just another demonstration of the hypocrisy of American liberals.

Scumbags.
 
justabubba said:
why am i not surprised you are from nc ... i bet rural nc, likely down east
Click to expand...

A. This is not a response to my factual statement. Do you wish to disprove it?
B. So, your response is a personal attack?
 
Eighty Deuce said:
"Skin in the game" is not a government check provided by other people's money (OPM). That is "other people's skin" in the game.
Click to expand...

apdst said:
If you don't pay taxes, you don't. If you don;t have anything to lose, other than your welfare, then you don't have skin in the game.
Click to expand...

Issue:

Everybody pays taxes.
 
Eighty Deuce said:
Lemme help you out here. With taxes that are common to all, explain to me the difference about who is in charge ?

But with such as income tax, where 47% or more don't pay a penny, and many get redistribution checks in the mail, do I really need to explain it to you ?

Is this another round of liberal denial ? Aren't you folks finally waking up to the fact that OPM is running out ?

HELLO !
Click to expand...
47% don't pay federal income taxes but everyone pays taxes.
 
Deuce said:
47% don't pay federal income taxes but everyone pays taxes.
Click to expand...

Life should be so simple as you pretend it to be. Your logic is currently bordering on ignorant.

So that we all are clear ... even you .. there is no wealth redistribution aspect of sales tax. Or gasoline taxes. Or social security.

I will not waste further time explaining, for at this point, if it is where you are, you don't want to know.
 
gee... liberals supporting Wasserman-Schultz, regardless of how stupid her words are.

What a ****ing surprise.
 
Whovian said:
gee... liberals supporting Wasserman-Schultz, regardless of how stupid her words are.

What a ****ing surprise.
Click to expand...

please tell us exactly what she said which was in error
 
Eighty Deuce said:
Life should be so simple as you pretend it to be. Your logic is currently bordering on ignorant.

So that we all are clear ... even you .. there is no wealth redistribution aspect of sales tax. Or gasoline taxes. Or social security.

I will not waste further time explaining, for at this point, if it is where you are, you don't want to know.
Click to expand...

You've just changed your argument from "X people don't pay taxes" to "Well ok everyone pays taxes but certain types of taxes don't count because____"
 
cpwill said:
Wow.

This was the same lady who accused Republicans of wanting to criminalize illegal immigration, and who accused Republicans of driving foriegn cars (when she herself did as well).

Dear DNC. Please keep this woman in charge of your organization. Because she is making you look amazingly stupid.


The video here
Click to expand...

It's called hyperbole. As a conservative, I'd think you'd be familiar with it.
 
Eighty Deuce said:
Lemme help you out here. With taxes that are common to all, explain to me the difference about who is in charge ?

But with such as income tax, where 47% or more don't pay a penny, and many get redistribution checks in the mail, do I really need to explain it to you ?

Is this another round of liberal denial ? Aren't you folks finally waking up to the fact that OPM is running out ?
Click to expand...
Do you know that most of those who pay no income taxes are because President Bush's policies? Why those who pay no Federal income taxes should not be able to vote?
 
pbrauer said:
Do you know that most of those who pay no income taxes are because President Bush's policies? Why those who pay no Federal income taxes should not be able to vote?
Click to expand...

Because he's an actual regressive and doesn't believe the most fundamental right that exists in democracy should be granted unless you happen to make enough money. He'll take grand stands on principle against government intrusion on our rights to free speech, owning guns, etc, but **** those poors they don't deserve a vote because they don't have enough money.
 
How ridiculous. Talk about throwing the race card. Wasserman-Shultz is SO over the top. Yep. They should keep her. She makes the dems look as crazy as they are.
 
Gargantuan said:
This actually does have some merit. They are trying to make it harder in some cases for younger members of the population to vote by requiring more identification/stopping voting in college districts.

"Recent Republican proposals have or would put in place onerous voter ID requirements, curtail early voting, and prevent students from casting ballots where they go to school. These proposals are costly and could disenfranchise hundreds of thousands if not millions of voters, but most of those affected are more likely to vote for Democrats. Republicans have invoked the specter of voter fraud to justify the restrictions, but the type of voter fraud these laws are designed to address are extremely rare — the Bush administration, despite pursuing the issue vigorously, never produced more than a handful of voter fraud prosecutions."


More: Hyperbole about Jim Crow shouldn’t obscure truth about GOP voting proposals - The Plum Line - The Washington Post

Man I seem to be finding myself defending this woman a lot :D
Click to expand...

Care to address my point rightys?
 
apdst said:
If you don't pay taxes, you don't. If you don;t have anything to lose, other than your welfare, then you don't have skin in the game.
Click to expand...

You are anti-democracy and pro-aristocracy.

And again, you prove her point.

And of course, in Indiana if you become the FIRST PERSON indicted on voter fraud charges, you become the Republican over-seer of elections and win the support of the governor (who decided not to run for president).
Ind. Supreme Court permits challenge of Charlie White's election to proceed
 
FilmFestGuy said:
How democratic of you.

And you just essentially proved her point.
Click to expand...


Democracy is a bunch of welfare chumps voting for the person that will keep the checks coming to the mailbox and take money from the working folks to pay for it?

That's democracy?
 
pbrauer said:
Do you know that most of those who pay no income taxes are because President Bush's policies? Why those who pay no Federal income taxes should not be able to vote?
Click to expand...

Please note. I have not advocated that those who pay no income taxes have no vote. There's noting to advocate there. Its not a bill anywhere. We both know, I hope, that such is not going to happen. I do believe we'd be better if it were such, but again, not going to happen.

And "Yes", I know that the Bush tax cuts took many off the income tax obligatory roles.

However, the thread is about standards of proof in order to vote. None of these are draconian. In many states, the rules already are such. What is being advocated, and which bimbo Wasserman ****s is criticising, is basic voting integrity. With Republicans having won so many State Houses in 2010, it is a trend you better get used to.

One man (or woman). One vote. What a concept !!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom