• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

LOL... it's not overlooked when they make mistakes, they just don't draw attention to themselves after they do it. Obama didn't come and argue that there are 56 states or whatever he said, and try to argue and explain why everybody else is stupid and he is smart and brilliant. Palin ****ed up when she wrote ad libs on her hand, and then she went on public TV again and wrote "HI MOM" on her hand and turned it into a joke. She likes attention, unfortunately for her, her love of attention isn't helping her career out or making her look serious or intelligent.

Really, look how Obama is protected by liberals when he doesn't know how many states or what year it is
 
I ****ing love you and Whovian are quick to attack the hypocrisy of others in this thread, yet you're completely blind to see your own. The fact that you have changed this conversation into a conversation about Obama's mistakes, liberal mistakes, and individual mistakes of posters goes to show how damn biased and hypocritical you and Whovian are.

You can't simply admit she made a mistake, yet you'll raise hell to see that other people admit mistakes whilst playing ignorant to the blatant hypocrisy in your behaviour.

Nice spin to dodge the hypocrisy and bias we see in the liberal media
 
she may have gotten things jumbled up on the museum tour... She's allowed to make mistakes, why can't you just admit that?

Because the liberals and media are quick to jump on her while giving democrats a pass
 
****ing hell, Ptif... lol. Would it kill you to have a reasonable conversation?

You justify Palin and condemn Obama and Biden, would you agree with that? I would agree with that... It's obvious, you're Conservative. 12345

Does that mean you hate Obama and Biden? Honestly, Ptif, is this the world you are coming from?? Does saying this crap make rational sense to you and not seem hyper partisan and laughable, because it reflects your own reality? You hate Obama and Biden, honest to God, hate them?

Let's see what's going on inside your head...

I do not hate them I hate their policies and partisanship when claiming to be bi-partisan and transparent. Their bias and hypocrisy hurts this country
 
That ranks up there as one of the dumbest and most desperate deflections yet on this thread ... best part ... he doesn't even know why. It's sad to see the lengths some of the Palinistas will go to just to make Palin appear to have an IQ of 90 instead of 80.

So you have no proof just your hate for Palin
 
Whre on Earth did you get the silly idea that believing in GW is liberal? :rofl

Hint: Liberalism would relate to one's views on political policies, not science.

GW is political not science. solar activity is low and this will likely cause a cooling period so all the doom and gloom of the scientists will be false
 
No, the policies people seek to implement in response to GW are political, not science.

No they are because of the so called findings of the science does not matter if the science is correct or not
 
So you have no proof just your hate for Palin
Of course I have proof. But I don't need it. You're the one making baseless assumptions of where Palin may have learned the idiotic notion that part of Paul Revere's ride "was to" warn the British -- you prove where she learned that.

Be that as it may, you now offer evidence that Obama made no gaffes. How do you know Michelle didn't convince him to write "2008" as a joke? How do you know he didn't say "57 states" on purpose because he lost a bet to Biden? That's how loony your suggestion that Palin learned bad history from that museum tour sounds.
 
No seriously, the sentence was compeltely indecipherable.



Where does it do that? :confused:

Scientist are payed by the government so science can show things like GW so the government can come up with new policy to tax us. Hence it is a political circle
 
Of course I have proof. But I don't need it. You're the one making baseless assumptions of where Palin may have learned the idiotic notion that part of Paul Revere's ride "was to" warn the British -- you prove where she learned that.

Be that as it may

, you now offer evidence that Obama made no gaffes. How do you know Michelle didn't convince him to write "2008" as a joke? How do you know he didn't say "57 states" on purpose because he lost a bet to Biden? That's how loony your suggestion that Palin learned bad history from that museum tour sounds.

Another words you have nothing
 
Another words you have nothing
On the contrary, I now have questions about Obama's supposed gaffes. Unless you can prove he didn't lose a bet to Biden to say "57 states" and that the First Lady didn't prod him to write "2008," by your own standards, you can't even say Obama gaffed.

That was awfully generous of you ... thanks!
 
Sara, please..........................................stop talking.
 
On the contrary, I now have questions about Obama's supposed gaffes. Unless you can prove he didn't lose a bet to Biden to say "57 states" and that the First Lady didn't prod him to write "2008," by your own standards, you can't even say Obama gaffed.

That was awfully generous of you ... thanks!

You have nothing other than a BS propaganda to go on a rabbit trail because you can not show proof. nice spin but shows why you have no credibility
 
Back
Top Bottom