• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

There can't be too clueless people in the world? Just because one person doesn't know something, doesn't mean by default the other person is correct. It is possible for both individuals to be wrong. I can't understand how you can defy such obvious facts about the world like "two people can both be wrong in a disagreement, therefore proving one wrong doesn't make the other correct." Its mind boggling.

Its just a ****ing gaffe, leave it at that, I can't believe how much energy people send on this kind of arguing, its entirely meaningless just a way for people to expend energy and feed their ego by insulting a few people over the internet. Whatever "side" you are is meaningless, its the same motivation on both sides.

Actually, it's not. Palin was right and we have a cat that doesn't even know what date the Battles of Lexington and Concord were fought on calling her ignorant.

Most of the anti-Palins have made themselves the fools in this thread, after the historical facts were revealed. oh, but now, "It's just a gaffe, let's leave it at that".
 
Uh, speaking of dates. When was the Bill of Rights ratified? And when did Revere/Dawes make their ride? Talk about a date spread.

Your playing these events over a difference of a few hours... and it has no relevance to your argument.

Yes...on April 18th...The Whigs in Mass clearly knew what was coming down the pike with the 700 Brit soldiers getting ready to pounce. Yes Mass had been stockpiling weapons...and yes, the Brits found out. And yes, like all good military campaigns, you do whatever you can to reduce your risk, which includes confiscating the weapons stockpile. And Yes...Paul Revere and William Dawes were sent to warn of the coming of the Brits.

With the above said...Palin's story...as she told it...had NOTHING to do with the 2nd Amendment. Paul Revere and Dawes weren't making their famous ride to protect the colonist 2nd Amendment Rights.

AND WISEONE is right...that said, I'm through. We have to agree to disagree.

Um, no, you have to agree that you totally blew the dates of these events. That's the only option.
 
Actually, it's not. Palin was right and we have a cat that doesn't even know what date the Battles of Lexington and Concord were fought on calling her ignorant.
How odd ... you claim Palin is right, but you still haven't shown Paul Revere ringing any bells as a method to warn the British ...
"He who warned the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms by ringing those bells"
She claimed he warned the British by ringing bells. History says otherwise.

And I note, you still refuse to answer this question ...

Do you think Obama doesn't know what year it is or do you think he had a brain fart when he wrote 2008?
 
If this episode causes any Republicans rally around Sarah Palin and view her as smart and intelligent and a possible candidate for the Presidency in 2012 - I welcome that. We can not have enough Republican support for Palin. This is turning out perfectly.
I had not given her any thought before this. Now I bought her book and will read it in the next few days. I love her conservatism. So what if she does not tell the story very well? That is essentially unimportant. She can lead this nation back from the extreme danger the last two presidents (neither one conservative) have put us in.
 
FALSE -- He was captured when he spoke to the British.

Palin didn't know what the hell she was talking about. She's an idiot.
She was right. You are wrong. No problem.

I like her more and more.
 
I had not given her any thought before this. Now I bought her book and will read it in the next few days. I love her conservatism. So what if she does not tell the story very well? That is essentially unimportant. She can lead this nation back from the extreme danger the last two presidents (neither one conservative) have put us in.
What difference does it make if she's Conservative or not since if she were to become president and if the economy were to get worse on her watch, Conservatives would do what they do with Conservative presidents they elect who fail -- call them Liberal.
 
Really? Do you truly believe in the mutability of the past?
Quibble all you want. She got the story essentially right. So what if she is not a great storyteller? We won't be electing her to replace the one term president Obama because she is a great storyteller.

No problem. You guys won't even see your defeat coming. Blinders. They are a wonderful thing. Enjoy them.
 
It's recorded in the same place where Paul Revere rode off to warn the British that they couldn't take our guns away, where we find that the moon landing was faked, that Bush was behind 9/11, where high flying jet planes are spraying us with chemicals, and global warming is a hoax. Let's see, did I leave anything out of that? Oh, the aliens who actually were behind the Kennedy assassination.
I think you are quite talented. I love your sense of humor. We are usually on the opposite side of every issue but you do have talent. I salute you.
 
Paul Revere's Ride
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

Listen my children and you shall hear
Of the midnight ride of Paul Revere,
On the eighteenth of April, in Seventy-five;
Hardly a man is now alive
Who remembers that famous day and year.
I love that poem. I don't know why. Perhaps it is entangled with my very few happy childhood memories. Thank you.
 
Quibble all you want. She got the story essentially right. So what if she is not a great storyteller? We won't be electing her to replace the one term president Obama because she is a great storyteller.

No problem. You guys won't even see your defeat coming. Blinders. They are a wonderful thing. Enjoy them.

Essentially. So she did not get it right then. The part that people are focusing on, she got wrong. The rest is right though... and what is even more bizarre is how you equate being right or wrong with being liberal or conservative.

Fascinating...

For your information, blinders are for people that don't see the truth. From where I am sitting, you are just as blinded as the "liberals" that you keep attacking, though less than apstd, perhaps.
 
2. Part of his ride was that he told a bunch of British soldiers that they were going to fail.
FALSE AGAIN.

Don't confuse semantics with FACTS. You make your argument look stupid.

Yes. You DO make your argument look stupid.

Paul Revere - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revere, Dawes, and Prescott were detained by a British Army patrol in Lincoln at a roadblock on the way to Concord.[27] Prescott jumped his horse over a wall and escaped into the woods; he eventually reached Concord. Dawes also escaped, though he fell off his horse not long after and did not complete the ride.[34][35]

Revere was captured and questioned by the British soldiers at gunpoint. He told them of the army's movement from Boston, and that British army troops would be in some danger if they approached Lexington, because of the large number of hostile militia gathered there. Everything Revere told his British captors had a single goal, to move the soldiers away from Lexington, where he had left Hancock and Adams.

Revere had reason to believe the patrol's mission was to arrest the two Patriot leaders. He and other captives taken by the patrol were still escorted east toward Lexington, until about a half mile from Lexington they heard a gunshot. The British major demanded Revere explain the shot, and Revere replied it was a signal to "alarm the Country". A few minutes later came a flurry of shots that seemed to alarm the British captors even beyond the panic they were already in. As the group drew closer to Lexington, the town bell began to clang rapidly, to which one of the captives proclaimed to the British soldiers "The bell's a'ringing! The town's alarmed, and you're all dead men!" The British soldiers gathered and decided not to press further towards Lexington, to instead free the prisoners and to head back to warn their commanders

Pretty sure that dead equals fail in war. :rofl: @ hazlnut
 
Yes. You DO make your argument look stupid.

Paul Revere - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Pretty sure that dead equals fail in war. :rofl: @ hazlnut

What is the last part of his name again... pretty much tells it all. Why bother? It is obvious that she made a mistake. THAT doesn't make her a moron. It is the gambit of other mistakes that she makes that indicate that she is a well coached moron.
 
What difference does it make if she's Conservative or not since if she were to become president and if the economy were to get worse on her watch, Conservatives would do what they do with Conservative presidents they elect who fail -- call them Liberal.
Fortunately that is not likely to happen.
 
For your information, blinders are for people that don't see the truth. From where I am sitting, you are just as blinded as the "liberals" that you keep attacking, though less than apstd, perhaps.
I have not been attacking. But I have been observing. Personally, I think you are kooky. In the big picture it doesn't matter. You will have your opinion of Palin and mine will be changed for the better. It all works out.
 
I have not been attacking. But I have been observing. Personally, I think you are kooky. In the big picture it doesn't matter. You will have your opinion of Palin and mine will be changed for the better. It all works out.

Kooky? How so?

Attacking? Pretty obvious. Not that I care... just pointing it out. Obviously insulting people due to political lean is an attack. Obviously insulting people by stating that they are blinded by their beliefs is an attack. No biggy... just be honest about it.
 
Yes. You DO make your argument look stupid.

Paul Revere - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Pretty sure that dead equals fail in war. :rofl: @ hazlnut
:2funny::2funny::bravo::bravo:

Like Palin you're doubling down on your FAIL.

So, when you're captured and questioned by the enemy... that's considered warning them???

And why did you put the quote by some random captive in bold? Makes no sense. Unless you didn't read the article.

You and the rest of the Palin apologists are so desperate to have her appear not stupid, you'll stretch as far as you can to make it fit.
 
Here is a video reenactment of Paul Revere's ride, proving that Palin was right, and all of those historians were wrong! Imagine that! Watch it for your self and see.

Palin was right all along
 
Kooky? How so?
That is a reasonable question. Palin got the story essentially right. She is not a story teller. She is not an expert. This was not a big deal. Yet you want to make it one. That is kooky.

Attacking? Pretty obvious. Not that I care... just pointing it out. Obviously insulting people due to political lean is an attack. Obviously insulting people by stating that they are blinded by their beliefs is an attack. No biggy... just be honest about it.
Observation. Not an attack. I don't (necessarily) think any less of you. Well, maybe just a little.

You are blinded by your beliefs. No doubt, so am I. :)
 
Whovian said:
Yes. You DO make your argument look stupid.

Paul Revere - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Pretty sure that dead equals fail in war. : @ hazlnut

:2funny::2funny::bravo::bravo:

Like Palin you're doubling down on your FAIL.

So, when you're captured and questioned by the enemy... that's considered warning them???

And why did you put the quote by some random captive in bold? Makes no sense. Unless you didn't read the article.

You and the rest of the Palin apologists are so desperate to have her appear not stupid, you'll stretch as far as you can to make it fit.

Your usual epic failure continues unabated I see...

A few minutes later came a flurry of shots that seemed to alarm the British captors even beyond the panic they were already in. As the group drew closer to Lexington, the town bell began to clang rapidly, to which one of the captives proclaimed to the British soldiers "The bell's a'ringing! The town's alarmed, and you're all dead men!" The British soldiers gathered and decided not to press further towards Lexington, to instead free the prisoners and to head back to warn their commanders

By the time this happened, the questioning by the enemy had obviously ended. unless interrogations were conducted while mounted and riding through the town :rofl:mad:hazlnut

My 'support' for Palin is tepid at best. I just like make you and the other haters look foolish.
 
]That is a reasonable question. Palin got the story essentially right. She is not a story teller. She is not an expert. This was not a big deal. Yet you want to make it one. That is kooky.

Where did I once utter anything that even remotely resembled my thinking that this error of hers is a big deal instead of just a simple fact? Can't wait...

Observation. Not an attack. I don't (necessarily) think any less of you. Well, maybe just a little.

OK. Observation.

I always operate under the thinking that if somebody thinks little of me, or whatever... they have a problem. I am about the most open and reasonable person that there is.

You are blinded by your beliefs. No doubt, so am I. :)

Again, I don't really hold concrete beliefs that would blind me, when discussing politics or war or most things... makes me open and reasonable, actually.
 
How odd ... you claim Palin is right, but you still haven't shown Paul Revere ringing any bells as a method to warn the British ...
"He who warned the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms by ringing those bells"
She claimed he warned the British by ringing bells. History says otherwise.

And I note, you still refuse to answer this question ...

Do you think Obama doesn't know what year it is or do you think he had a brain fart when he wrote 2008?

That's not what she said. be careful of your own gaffes.
 
You know, I just might change my position on Palin.

If she is persuasive enough to get her followers to revise history in order to make it line up with something she has said, she should be able to convince Congress of just about anything, maybe even the need for a balanced budget. She might even be able to convince the nutters in the Middle East to stop fighting. How she has such power I can't say, but if she can be manipulated into using them for good, she could accomplish miracles. Now, if we can get her to surround herself with sane, logical, and practical people, just imagine what could result!
 
Where did I once utter anything that even remotely resembled my thinking that this error of hers is a big deal instead of just a simple fact? Can't wait...
I try to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps I have confused you with someone else? She is not a storyteller or a historian. She mangled her answer. But, despite all of that, in my opinion, after reading R. Revere's memorandum, she still got it right.
 
Back
Top Bottom