Page 81 of 123 FirstFirst ... 3171798081828391 ... LastLast
Results 801 to 810 of 1225

Thread: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

  1. #801
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    09-24-15 @ 12:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    13,156

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliticalMama View Post
    Exactly. The more she says stupid comments the more I think she really is ignorant.
    Can prove how much of what she said came from her tour at the Paul Revere museum she had just left?

  2. #802
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    09-24-15 @ 12:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    13,156

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    That's like asking for proof that Fox has ever came to Obama's defense... They spend most of their time attacking him, not praising him. Obama defended Palin, and said her kids were off limits. Has Palin ever defended Obama?
    Obama said that because he also wanted his kids off limits. That means nothing and most people would say a politicians kids should be off limits.

  3. #803
    Sage
    SheWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,470

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    Obama said that because he also wanted his kids off limits. That means nothing and most people would say a politicians kids should be off limits.
    He didn't have to say anything. He could have attacked her kids, and of course he wants his kids left alone. You can't call him a hypocrite on the issue when it comes to Palin.

  4. #804
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    09-24-15 @ 12:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    13,156

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    He didn't have to say anything. He could have attacked her kids, and of course he wants his kids left alone. You can't call him a hypocrite on the issue when it comes to Palin.
    I can say the reason he did it was to protect his own kids. If he did not defend Palin how could he claim his kids off limits. It is just common sense for most of us that a politicians kids are off limits it is liberals that must be told.

  5. #805
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    You are the one being dishonest. I also said liberal media.
    Allow me to introduce you to the word "or", since you seem to have no clue as to what it means, despite your use of said word.

    It is a conjunction. (Click link for second grade grammar lesson if you are unfamiliar with conjunctions). It's definition, according to Webster's dictionary, is

    used as a function word to indicate an alternative <coffee or tea> <sink or swim>, the equivalent or substitutive character of two words or phrases <lessen or abate>, or approximation or uncertainty <in five or six days>

    Or - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
    In the context of your question, it takes on the meaning of indicating an alternative. since liberal and liberal media do not NOT equivilant or substitutive character, nor did it indicate an approximation.

    You'll also note that the defintiion itself uses "or" twice in the "equivalent or substitutive character of two words or phrases" fashion since "equivilant" and "substitutive" have an equivalent or substitutive character, as do "approximation" and "uncertainty". This can be used to assist your in comprehending what it was that you actually asked, since there is no comprehension of your own question evident from your responses.

    But here's the kicker, regardless of which definition you seek to plug in, neither allows you to weasle your way out of the fact that the question was adequately answered as asked.

    So I retract the intellectually dishonest question, seeing as you clearly did not understand what the word "or" means.

    Intellectual incompetence is not the same thing as intellectual dishonesty.

    You show why you make a good liberal
    Not nearly as well as you show why you make a piss poor judge of what is conservative and what is liberal.

  6. #806
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    09-24-15 @ 12:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    13,156

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    Allow me to introduce you to the word "or", since you seem to have no clue as to what it means, despite your use of said word.

    It is a conjunction. (Click link for second grade grammar lesson if you are unfamiliar with conjunctions). It's definition, according to Webster's dictionary, is



    In the context of your question, it takes on the meaning of indicating an alternative. since liberal and liberal media do not NOT equivilant or substitutive character, nor did it indicate an approximation.

    You'll also note that the defintiion itself uses "or" twice in the "equivalent or substitutive character of two words or phrases" fashion since "equivilant" and "substitutive" have an equivalent or substitutive character, as do "approximation" and "uncertainty". This can be used to assist your in comprehending what it was that you actually asked, since there is no comprehension of your own question evident from your responses.

    But here's the kicker, regardless of which definition you seek to plug in, neither allows you to weasle your way out of the fact that the question was adequately answered as asked.

    So I retract the intellectually dishonest question, seeing as you clearly did not understand what the word "or" means.

    Intellectual incompetence is not the same thing as intellectual dishonesty.



    Not nearly as well as you show why you make a piss poor judge of what is conservative and what is liberal.
    The truth is you knew what I meant and tried to pull a fast one.I would expect nothing more from you

  7. #807
    Sage
    SheWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,470

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    I can say the reason he did it was to protect his own kids. If he did not defend Palin how could he claim his kids off limits. It is just common sense for most of us that a politicians kids are off limits it is liberals that must be told.
    I already answered your question. He would have attacked her kids, if he were a hypocrite... Hypocrisy isn't uncommon in politics.

    "Liberals must be told."

    Short term memory loss, or hypocrisy? Rush Limbaugh and McCain are pretty damn well know for attacking Chelsea Clinton. And Conservatives like Dr. Laura have even attacked Palin and her kids... wtf, Ptif, seriously, wtf

  8. #808
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    The truth is you knew what I meant and tried to pull a fast one.I would expect nothing more from you
    The truth is that you asked for something, and when you were provided with it, you moved the goalposts.

    Now this wasn't unexpected, but it does bring up the question: was it deliberate dishonesty or pure incompetence?

  9. #809
    Professor

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Last Seen
    11-21-14 @ 03:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    2,120

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    Nothing is going to change the fact she got the history right (ask the historians*) and the press in their Moment thinking Palin was wrong attempted yet another journ-O-listic gang-bang (without checking or knowing history), found themselves desperately prodding each other and ejaculating all over each others faces.

    Meanwhile Palin was in the bus watching all this... surely laughing her ass off as the journ-O-lists did it to themselves... yet again.

    *One historian quoted said she had her history correct, while another historian called it "lucky"... ROTFLOL...

    .
    She's laughing at the people who keep giving her money and support even when she mangles the English language and American history.

  10. #810
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    09-24-15 @ 12:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    13,156

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    I already answered your question. He would have attacked her kids, if he were a hypocrite... Hypocrisy isn't uncommon in politics.

    "Liberals must be told."

    Short term memory loss, or hypocrisy? Rush Limbaugh and McCain are pretty damn well know for attacking Chelsea Clinton. And Conservatives like Dr. Laura have even attacked Palin and her kids... wtf, Ptif, seriously, wtf
    No you justified what Obama did when he had selfish motives it was not about Palin

Page 81 of 123 FirstFirst ... 3171798081828391 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •