Page 79 of 123 FirstFirst ... 2969777879808189 ... LastLast
Results 781 to 790 of 1225

Thread: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

  1. #781
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last Seen
    05-06-12 @ 11:12 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    9,800

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Sorry for the big ass off-topic, all y'all.

  2. #782
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    This thread just makes want to sing and dance


  3. #783
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last Seen
    05-06-12 @ 11:12 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    9,800

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    This thread just makes want to sing and dance
    Oh? Not this one?


  4. #784
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    dimensionally transcendental
    Last Seen
    08-15-11 @ 04:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    7,153

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    I did... and I'll do it again...

    "Bissell is an unsung hero of the Revolutionary War who, independent of Paul Revere, had been sent to warn the colonists that the war had begun. Bissell accomplished his mission by riding into towns, ringing the church bell and firing his musket to get the attention of the residents so that he could pass along his message."

    The Policy Page - Forbes

    Now it's your turn.



    I did... and I'll do it again... and again, and again, and again



    "Bissell is an unsung hero of the Revolutionary War who, independent of Paul Revere, had been sent to warn the colonists that the war had begun. Bissell accomplished his mission by riding into towns, ringing the church bell and firing his musket to get the attention of the residents so that he could pass along his message."

    The Policy Page - Forbes

    Now it's your turn.



    Reality bomb in coming. I have retracted some of my statements, because I haven't found substantial evidence by back up my entire initial state.

    Reality bomb in coming... I am not denying that I have retracted part of my initial statement.

    I am being intellectually honest and fair.

    Your turn. Show me a site... that substantially proves me wrong. I am ready to admit I am wrong, when I am logically proven to be entirely and 100% incorrect, so far you haven't done that.





    If you are so damn sure I am entirely incorrect, then why can't you find something that proves it so... I have posted something that says I was correct. I admit I have been searching, and I will keep searching... WTF have you searched... WTF have you posted?

    Be honest about this discussion. I can admit I am wrong when I am wrong, but first it takes proving me that I am wrong. I swear I don't have my ego tied up in this, nor would I be embarrassed to be wrong on the internet. I am not that pathetic.



    1. I have to find evidence that I am right, but you don't.. ... that's pathetic

    2. I'll repeat myself as often as I can. Yes, I'll recant myself, and I am doing so. I am recanting myself because I am being intellectually honest and admitting there may have been some error on my part. I am not ashamed to admit that. I am not embarrassed to admit that. I am willing to admit I am 100% when I am PROVEN I am 100% wrong, and so far, you haven't done that.

    I am not entirely recanting myself because I am not entirely convinced I am wrong. I will admit I was 100% wrong, when proven so.

    3. I can back up other people thinking the very same thing...

    4. I have never had an issue with admitting I am wrong. I have said all of these things the entire time. You're just imaging ****.



    1. You haven't proven anything. I am the one doing the honest and intellectual research. You're the one appealing to ignorance and sitting back and acting immature with your pwned memes like I give a ****. You honestly don't seem to understand what is going on in this exchange.

    2. You haven't proven anything as a myth. I have done all the damn research and have been honest with it. All you have done is appeal to ignorance with one damn wiki article.



    Do you know what "appeal to ignorance means?"
    If I posted a blog... the word of some completely unknown and un-nammed source, as proof of a statement I made, EVERY poster in here would be on my ass about it. And rightly so.

    You seem to lack the ability to understand what you did. I've tried quite patiently to explain to you that it is not up to us to prove you wrong, it is up to you to prove you're right. Sorry sister, but a blog entry doesn't cut it. No more that the WIKI piece would if I posted something a Palin supported edited in her historical favor.

    You can deflect, dance, spin, lie, anything you wish. Doesn't change the fact that you made a mistake, and it took you a few days of pretending to be Palin for you to come to terms with your mistake.

    I congratulate you on your eventual honesty in finally admitting your error.

  5. #785
    Sage
    SheWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,513

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Whovian View Post
    Yes, because no woman could EVER hate another woman, right? Just men do that.
    Women can be sexist, and men can be feminist... But seeing a man who is not a feminist and is not concerned with gender issues... or who is only concerned with reverse sexism, calling a woman a woman hater is ****ing ridiculous and being an opportunist. She didn't generalize women or judge women, she only judged Palin... therefore, he is being an opportunist.

    Do men want to hear women lecture them on what "being a real man" means? No... and if they do, then there is an issue. I don't want to see Conservative men use Palin like she is some kind of victim of sexism every time she gets criticized, and criticized by other women. You guys aren't women, have never been women, don't think or act like women, have never been treated like women, have never felt sexism as a woman, so unless you are a feminist or concerned with all forms of sexism, you are no damn position to judge our views as women and call any of us woman haters.
    Last edited by SheWolf; 06-12-11 at 10:58 PM.

  6. #786
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    dimensionally transcendental
    Last Seen
    08-15-11 @ 04:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    7,153

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    Women can be sexist, and men can be feminist... But seeing a man who is not a feminist and is not concerned with gender issues... or who is only concerned with reverse sexism, calling a woman a woman hater is ****ing ridiculous and being an opportunist. She didn't generalize women or judge women, she only judged Palin... therefore, he is being an opportunist.

    Do men want to hear women lecture them on what "being a real man" means? No... and if they do, then there is an issue. I don't want to see Conservative men use Palin like she is some kind of victim of sexism everything she gets criticized, and criticized by other women. You guys aren't women, have never been women, don't think or act like women, so unless you are a feminist or concerned with all forms of sexism, you are no damn position to judge our views as women and call any of us woman haters.
    So... if I were to post a peice written by a woman... expressing hatred for another woman... I'm just an opportunist? That's a rather silly argument.

  7. #787
    Sage
    SheWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,513

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Whovian View Post
    If I posted a blog... the word of some completely unknown and un-nammed source, as proof of a statement I made, EVERY poster in here would be on my ass about it. And rightly so.

    You seem to lack the ability to understand what you did. I've tried quite patiently to explain to you that it is not up to us to prove you wrong, it is up to you to prove you're right. Sorry sister, but a blog entry doesn't cut it. No more that the WIKI piece would if I posted something a Palin supported edited in her historical favor.

    You can deflect, dance, spin, lie, anything you wish. Doesn't change the fact that you made a mistake, and it took you a few days of pretending to be Palin for you to come to terms with your mistake.

    I congratulate you on your eventual honesty in finally admitting your error.
    LOL... I am being honest, but you are not. You keep claiming to prove me wrong, and you are setting the rules of this debate in a manner that only leans in your favor. You have been extremely unfair and biased towards your position, not willing to meet me half way in any sense. I have admitted to plenty, though you have admitted to nothing and none of the above.

    You're not being honest or honestly judging my actions. I do not stand 100% wrong. I am have taken more steps to research this than you, and share those findings as honestly as I can. I haven't found anything substantial, and have said that for pages and pages, whilst you arrogantly pounded your chest and declared victory and pwnage... yet there has been nothing that says you're 100% correct, so now the question is, can you admit you haven't been shown to be 100% correct?

  8. #788
    Sage
    SheWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,513

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Whovian View Post
    So... if I were to post a peice written by a woman... expressing hatred for another woman... I'm just an opportunist? That's a rather silly argument.
    You are not acknowledging my entire comment.

  9. #789
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    dimensionally transcendental
    Last Seen
    08-15-11 @ 04:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    7,153

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    LOL... I am being honest, but you are not. You keep claiming to prove me wrong, and you are setting the rules of this debate in a manner that only leans in your favor.
    I didn't set the rules. It's simply the way it has always been. Here, or ant debate board. If you make a statement, it is your responsibility to provide evidence to back it up. It's not everyone else's responsibility to prove you wrong. That would be pulling a David Axlerod.

    You have been extremely unfair and biased towards your position, not willing to meet me half way in any sense. I have admitted to plenty, though you have admitted to nothing and none of the above.
    What exactly would you like me to admit? That you did not make a factual error? You did. That you did NOT require me to prove you were wrong, instead of following proper procedure and proving yourself right? Again, doesn't work that way.

    You're not being honest or honestly judging my actions.
    I have been nothing but honest. You, on the other hand... only recently began to do so.
    I do not stand 100% wrong. I am have taken more steps to research this than you, and share those findings as honestly as I can. I haven't found anything substantial, and have said that for pages and pages, whilst you arrogantly pounded your chest and declared victory and pwnage... yet there has been nothing that says you're 100% correct, so now the question is, can you admit you haven't been shown to be 100% correct?
    When there is ZERO evidence to prove something, it is safe to say it's incorrect. You have ZERO evidence, other than a blog entry from some nobody. I already explained why that is ZERO evidence. Do you need a refresher?
    Your problem appears to be that..

    A... you don't like it when you're proven wrong
    B... you especially don't like it when I prove you wrong
    C... it takes you a considerable amount of time to finally admit any error
    D... even after admitting error, you whine about how and why you came to that admission

    None of which are my fault, or problem.

  10. #790
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Seen
    06-25-11 @ 02:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    55

    Re: Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

    LOL The Youtube Videos are so large!

Page 79 of 123 FirstFirst ... 2969777879808189 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •