• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

RamFel said:
Even more stupid is thinking that there are 57 states, or referring to Navy Corpsman as "Navy corpse-men". Boy, that Palin sure is stu---
Oh wait. That was Obama!
Click to expand...

People have accents and pronounce things differently... Palin, Bush, Obama, Clinton, etc. Who the hell cares? You're really despite and grasping at straws when you have to resort to attacking accents and enunciation. :roll:
 
Whovian said:
If you did not say she was running...

Then how is her goal to become President/ You can't become President without running for office.

I'll forgo the normal 'you suck at this', as you're a newbie.
Click to expand...

I said "Her goal is to become president" but that doesn't mean she is running for president now. Me being a newbie is a completely irrelevant. Thank you very much. Someone can have a goal to become president but not ever run.
 
ptif219 said:
That is what you said. You justify a democrat doing it yet make excuses to condemn a GOP for it
Click to expand...

I ****ing love you and Whovian are quick to attack the hypocrisy of others in this thread, yet you're completely blind to see your own. The fact that you have changed this conversation into a conversation about Obama's mistakes, liberal mistakes, and individual mistakes of posters goes to show how damn biased and hypocritical you and Whovian are.

You can't simply admit she made a mistake, yet you'll raise hell to see that other people admit mistakes whilst playing ignorant to the blatant hypocrisy in your behaviour.
 
ptif219 said:
I made no claim. I asked was it her thought or did she hear it in the museum tour. You claim to know the answer so prove it
Click to expand...

she may have gotten things jumbled up on the museum tour... She's allowed to make mistakes, why can't you just admit that?
 
ptif219 said:
You justify Obama and Biden and condemn Palin I would say that show who you support and who you hate.
Click to expand...

****ing hell, Ptif... lol. Would it kill you to have a reasonable conversation?

You justify Palin and condemn Obama and Biden, would you agree with that? I would agree with that... It's obvious, you're Conservative. 12345

Does that mean you hate Obama and Biden? Honestly, Ptif, is this the world you are coming from?? Does saying this crap make rational sense to you and not seem hyper partisan and laughable, because it reflects your own reality? You hate Obama and Biden, honest to God, hate them?

Let's see what's going on inside your head...
 
Whovian said:
Did she, or did she not mention specifically the 2nd amendment. If yes, she is obviously wrong. If no, then all mentions of it were started by haters trying to **** with her.

Of course, I don't expect you to comprehend this.
Click to expand...

Oh come the **** on... accusing me of not comprehending. My response was a joke. I have been respectful to you and did more than meet you half way. WTF. You're not even an honest debater, and I proved that I am. If you intended to have a real conversation, you wouldn't come off so damn crass and insulting.
 
ptif219 said:
Prove it is her thought and not what the museum said

SheWolf said:
lol... so you're going to appeal to ignorance. Weak, just weak. If Palin was misinformed, then she should have said so instead she said she was right... She isn't admitting her error.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
That ranks up there as one of the dumbest and most desperate deflections yet on this thread ... best part ... he doesn't even know why. It's sad to see the lengths some of the Palinistas will go to just to make Palin appear to have an IQ of 90 instead of 80.
 
Last edited:
Sheik Yerbuti said:
That ranks up there as one of the dumbest and most desperate deflections yet on this thread ... best part ... he doesn't even know why. It's sad to see the lengths some of the Palinistas will go to just to make Palin appear to have an IQ 90 instead of 80.
Click to expand...

I am still wondering why these people will defend her antics no matter what. They have the most creative excuses too, and some of the most brain busting deflections and fallacies. What's so bad about saying she makes mistakes, and it's ok. I have said over and over again, that this doesn't make her a full fledged retard.

I admit I get on here and say some crazy **** out of boredom, because I like to stir the pot... lol. But I don't think these people are defending her out of boredom. They defend her so much, the task of doing it should be boring by now.
 
SheWolf said:
I am still wondering why these people will defend her antics no matter what. They have the most creative excuses too, and some of the most brain busting deflections and fallacies. What's so bad about saying she makes mistakes, and it's ok. I have said over and over again, that this doesn't make her a full fledged retard.

I admit I get on here and say some crazy **** out of boredom, because I like to stir the pot... lol. But I don't think these people are defending her out of boredom. They defend her so much, the task of doing it should be boring by now.
Click to expand...

I wonder why you people go after her like you do. Fear? jealousy? She's more woman than you are? It's sure as not just because she's a Conservative, or that she's stupid. I mean, if it was just about those two things, ya'll woulda shut up about her two years ago.
 
apdst said:
I wonder why you people go after her like you do. Fear? jealousy? She's more woman than you are? It's sure as not just because she's a Conservative, or that she's stupid. I mean, if it was just about those two things, ya'll woulda shut up about her two years ago.
Click to expand...

1. I am not going after her. I have said she's human and allowed to make mistakes.

2. Yes, I happen to have a ***** like Palin does... such an observation has nothing to do with this conversation, nor do my opinions devalue me as a woman. Do your opinions devalue you as a man?

3. I don't think she is as stupid as she looks. I think people who fall for her ****, give her a free pass time and time again, make her rich, and love the idea of President Palin are the actual stupid people.
 
ptif219 said:
You made the claim so prove it
Click to expand...
SheWolf said:
aaaahaha... He is just like Whovian. Everybody else has prove their points, not him...
Click to expand...
So, you admit you don't like to play by your own rules. Nice. Everyone else has to prove their point.. but you are not required to prove yours.

You truly suck at this.
 
Whovian said:
So, you admit you don't like to play by your own rules. Nice. Everyone else has to prove their point.. but you are not required to prove yours.

You truly suck at this.
Click to expand...

I did play by my own rules. I posted a link supporting my statement. :roll:

You're the one that insisted the burden of prof was only on my shoulders just like Ptif is doing...
 
PoliticalMama said:
I said "Her goal is to become president" but that doesn't mean she is running for president now. Me being a newbie is a completely irrelevant. Thank you very much. Someone can have a goal to become president but not ever run.
Click to expand...

um... no. They can't. It is logically impossible to have the goal to become President of the United States, and never run for office.
 
Redress said:
102 posts on this so far, and none of them change the fact that in the long and short run, this does not matter.
Click to expand...

Say what? It matters if she actually gets elected. What this shows is that Palin ignores the very written text of a letter to support her agenda. That does not suggest that she inhabits a world where facts are based on reality but are instead based on what she wants them to be at the time.

Sure she bungled history. What is worse is that she specifically cites a letter that in virtually no ways supports what she claimed. When you are willing to ignore what a letter actually says and fabricate what you want it to say, that is not a sign of a good decision maker. Information is power and when your basis of decision making, information does not reflect reality there is basically one assured out come: Total Epic Fail.
 
First, the Second Amendment didn't exist at that time, and why would Paul Revere want to ride in that night to protect people's rights to guns?
Second, Paul Revere didn't warn the British. He was captured, threatened, so he was under pressure. His ride wasn't to warn the British, it was to warn the colonial troops.
If Paul Revere really did those things, especially the second, he would have been cast as a traitor.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Well those are her words, so she owns them. She certainly had ample opportunity to say that's what she learned on that tour, but she didn't. Instead, she insisted she was right.
Click to expand...

So you have no proof just your opinion
 
Tucker Case said:
Ah, so you are just making an uneducated guess that I'm a liberal based not on my political views, but instead on the fact that I speak in an educated fashion and prove you wrong.

One does not need to be a liberal to speak in an edicated fashion and prove you wrong. Fankly, I'm surprised you have such a low esteem for conservatives that you think they wouldn't be able to do these things.
Click to expand...

No I base it on your views in several threads For instance you have liberal views on GW
 
Removable Mind said:
I'm never cease to be amazed at the incredible indictment of some type of barbarism that's assigned to a person being liberal...or conservative. Everybody who is a liberal is going straight to Socialist/Communist Hell. All who is conservative is going to Fundamentalist/Hypocrite Hell.

However...Independents are going to the nearest pub and drink a pint and let the Liberals and Conservatives fight it out. :cool:
Click to expand...

I am an independent conservative so do I go drink a beer or fight it out?
 
PoliticalMama said:
What President Obama and Biden say is irrelevant in a thread that is about Sarah Palin. You can try to take attention away from a woman who is obviously very ignorant but it's not working. And I never said she was running. But I can tell she would love to be president one day but the majority of American's wouldn't vote for her if she paid them. I am not biased, nor am I a Democrat or liberal. Just because someone disagrees with you views doesn't make them a Democrat.
Click to expand...

It is relevant because it shows the bias and hypocrisy
 
SheWolf said:
Ptif... really, this response doesn't make sense, and you are ignoring the huge gaffe you made about liberals only attacking kids. :roll:
Click to expand...

Makes perfect sense. Really?Yet we see the liberal media still attacking Bristol
 
SheWolf said:
lol... so you're going to appeal to ignorance. Weak, just weak. If Palin was misinformed, then she should have said so instead she said she was right... She isn't admitting her error.
Click to expand...

So you have no proof
 
ptif219 said:
No I base it on your views in several threads For instance you have liberal views on GW
Click to expand...

Whre on Earth did you get the silly idea that believing in GW is liberal? :rofl

Hint: Liberalism would relate to one's views on political policies, not science.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom