• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

The only thing that could help Obama is if he would stop campaigning and start being president and work to fix the economy and unemployment

So, extreme liberals are right, government is the answer? :coffeepap
 
A liberal media poll for someone that is not running. More useless polls and news to attack Palin

Excellent point --- or belief at any rate. I hope that all republicans adopt your way of thinking and respond by supporting Palin in the face of leftist criticism.
 
No amount of spin is going to change that she got history wrong. This has been demonstrated OVER AND OVER. I find it a laugh a minute how some of you have so little objectivity that you refuse to see this. Guess that's why they call it "blind partisanship".

Historians have noted she got the story correct. Your choice is she either got lucky or got it right.

If someone else spoke like that but instead used slang for conservatives, you'd call it typical liberal slander and go on a long rant I'm sure about how unprofessional liberals are. Tell me why I should I listen to it when it comes from your mouth and not theirs?
But it is correct. If it is correct, then it is correct.

Journ-O-lists came about of their own fruition. Where once we assumed collusion, they proved it. And they continue to illustrate a consistency in their terminology, targets and selective "justice".

With all the journalistic attention there is a "trail" lets say. Palin has one, correct? Now... you will probably agree Jetboogieman is not stupid, just a rung up from your pedestrian Lib. Now, having asked this Palin detractor (as I am with Obama) and he claimed Palin was stupid or something of the sort... I asked why?

Jet had days to craft an answer from his well sourced journ-O-lists. The best he could come up with was Tits and TV Star as his foundation of disdain. Noting about governance, the Constitution, Energy Policy... Jet en-capsuled the essence of journ-O-lism. A largely parasitic gang that serves its party's interests, but harms the public's ability to know and judge. Theyafter people dangerous to their cause ... while covering for their own. 2008 was a monument to cheer leading.

I wouldn't mind if they went after both sides the same, but let's not kid anyone about how far we are from that. America has a couple great avenues to help balance it out some; the internet and talk radio BUT there shouldn't be any "balancing out", there should be hard nosed reporting.

.
 
Last edited:
What Sarah Palin Got Wrong

Sarah Palin said that Paul Revere “warned the British that they weren’t gonna be taking away our arms, by ringing those bells and making sure, as he’s riding his horse through town, to send those warning shots and bells that we were gonna be secure and we were gonna be free.”

As the author of a book about Revere’s life, when I heard this, I groaned. From Revere’s own account, it’s clear that he didn’t fire a shot, he didn’t ring a bell, and he didn’t intend to warn the British of anything (unless you count the townsfolk as British, which they technically were for a little while longer).

The unarmed Revere left Boston in total silence. He muffled the oars of his boat as men rowed him to Charlestown, and he rode in silence after leaving Charlestown by horseback. He was, after all, on a secret mission to alert John Hancock and Samuel Adams in Lexington that they were in danger.

Only after scaring up two redcoats on horseback and turning away to Medford did he begin waking the countryside. He first woke the militia captain in Medford and then rode to Lexington raising the alarm — by shouting, mind you, not shooting or ringing bells.

— Joel J. Miller is the author of The Revolutionary Paul Revere and the vice president of editorial and acquisitions at Thomas Nelson Publishers.
 
Last edited:
That convoy song was on Futurerama tonight... lol.

Every time I hear that song or "convoy" I'll think of this thread from now on.... :lol:
 
Last edited:
That's just the Liberal media lying as usual... The Liberals are bloodthirsty to smear and attack Palin because they fear her.

Do you really believe that, or are you an Obama supporter in disguise? Come clean now, do you really want the opposition to support Palin so that Obama can have an easy victory?
 
Excellent point --- or belief at any rate. I hope that all republicans adopt your way of thinking and respond by supporting Palin in the face of leftist criticism.

It shows the foolishness of the left
 
No need to the media following her around proves that

Hate to break it to you, but since she quit the bus tour, nobody is following her anymore.
 
Nice spin from a liberal site. Here is where he is according to your site


Obama promises kept and not - International Business Times

President Obama has kept 127 of his promises, compromised on 40, broken 28, is stalled in 82, and is still working on keeping 226, according to the political tracking website Politifact.

How can going point by point, for pages and pages, be construed as a "liberal slant"? And if you refuse my link, I return the favor. I'll stick with facts, thanks.
 
Last edited:
How can going point by point, for pages and pages, be construed as a "liberal slant"? And if you refuse my link, I return the favor. I'll stick with facts, thanks.

What I put forth used your source but also shows how many have failed have not been done and those still working on. Seems he has much to do to keep his promises.
 
Cause he explained what he told her.

And you still haven't answered my question ... are you now admitting she got it wrong but excusing her because of what he said?

She got it wrong, so she's stupid? So if you get something wrong, you're stupid too right?
 
She got it wrong, so she's stupid? So if you get something wrong, you're stupid too right?

Perhaps - or perhaps not. One incident does not prove it one way or the other.

But wrong is wrong.
 
She got it wrong, so she's stupid? So if you get something wrong, you're stupid too right?

If I get something wrong, then go on TV to tell the world that everyone else is wrong, and I'm right, then yes, that sounds pretty stupid.

Or, maybe just kind of egocentric.

When my supporters try to say I'm right when everyone with an ounce of sense knows I'm wrong, that makes them sound pretty ridiculous as well. When they can no longer support my upside down view of history, and decide to try to blame someone else for my faux pas, then that makes them look pretty silly, doesn't it?
 
She got it wrong, so she's stupid? So if you get something wrong, you're stupid too right?
WTF?? I didn't say she's stupid, I said ...
"Ummm, no, he [the North Church vicor] did not say that. He said he informed her that Revere had founded their bell ringing guild years earlier as a teenager, he said nothing about Revere ringing any bells or firing any guns during his famous midnight ride. He also said nothing about telling her that part of that ride was to warn the British. Those were Palin's unfortunate choice of words, not his."
 
Back
Top Bottom