I wonder why does everything have to be so conspiritorial? Why can't a person just be speaking the truth for a change? Why does everything have to be for personal glory or financial gain?
Is it possible that the author of this tell-all book could actually be telling the truth? Think about it for a moment...?
If Sarah Palin is so innocent of wrong doing, why were folks bringing about lawsuit against her in the first place?
If she didn't violate any ethics rules/laws, why didn't she remain Alaska's governor and fight the charges? No state-sponsored legal fund you say? Well, she had access to two of them set up by people who came to her defense. What happened to the money? And does anyone know what the outcome was of the charges that were brought against her? Clearly, she wasn't convicted...why? Was she found innocent or did she leave office as part of some deal to have the charges dropped?
I'm not trying to belittle her; I'm just asking questions because it does appear that she caused alot of problems while governor and then ran when the **** hit the fan. To that, I think it only fair to ask if the author is telling the truth and as such do people not want to believe that this woman has done wrong in her brief political career? Or could it be that Sarah Palin is just a victim of someone seeking to make his fortune off her by spinning the issues?
As BDBoop points out, if Palin does run for the presidency the truth will come out one way or another. And either the accusations brought against her long before this book was published will be proven to be true or she'll be vindicated. I say let the chips fall where they may.
no lets just take folks at face value, my bad.... I salute our gay sex having crack smoking, muslim kenyan president.