Originally Posted by johnny_rebson:
These are the same liberals who forgot how Iraq attacked us on 9/11.
human rights abuses, etc.,) the outcome won't have a material adverse impact on critical U.S. interests and allies.
IMO, U.S. foreign policy should be anchored in its interests. Priority should be given where critical interests and allies are at stake. An example would be a more robust policy for dealing with Iran's nuclear activities. Libya, though, simply does not rise anywhere close to that level.
Oh I am truly sorry, I could have swore that you injected some snarky little, attitude ridden snipe about how Afghanistan was going. I was just pointing out how at this moment it is the Obama administration that is prosecuting that war, and any set backs, or losses in it are laid at his feet. If being off topic is actually addressing what you said maybe you could talk the moderators into a liblady only section where you can spend the day talking to yourself.
AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)