• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wal-Mart: Our shoppers are 'running out of money'

not the same as his energy plan, poor attempt at divesion....people who cannot admit that Carter was right about needing an energy plan are too indoctrinated by the GOP to think for themselves...

No kidding. It's almost like they really don't care what happens to the country as long as their party is in charge.
 
Inflation is also playing a part in this. When one goes to the grocery store and walks out with two bags of groceries that costs $50, buying less Chinese made garbage seems like the next logical step. Of course this is related to rising gas prices, but also a declining dollar.
 
vote obama, 2012!

carter wasn't the worst!

the rightwing nutjob who undid carter was!

dang, this is gonna be easy

the slasher's problem is that too many americans are ON to him, know him for exactly who he is

know the man by knowing the true sentiments of his supporters

seeya at the polls, pals
 
vote obama, 2012!

carter wasn't the worst!

the rightwing nutjob who undid carter was!

dang, this is gonna be easy

the slasher's problem is that too many americans are ON to him, know him for exactly who he is

know the man by knowing the true sentiments of his supporters

seeya at the polls, pals
You are totally clueless. Carter was the only president that came up with a workable plan to make us energy independent. It's really sad that there are so many brain dead people like you.
 
why do we need to government to tell us where and how to get our energy?
 
The federal government’s largest housing construction program for the poor has squandered hundreds of millions of dollars on stalled or abandoned projects and routinely failed to crack down on derelict developers or the local housing agencies that funded them. Nationwide, nearly 700 projects awarded $400 million have been idling for years, a Washington Post investigation found. Some have languished for a decade or longer even as much of the country struggles with record-high foreclosures and a dramatic loss of affordable housing.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which oversees the nation’s housing fund, has largely looked the other way: It does not track the pace of construction and often fails to spot defunct deals, instead trusting local agencies to police projects. The result is a trail of failed developments in every corner of the country. Fields where apartment complexes were promised are empty and neglected. Houses that were supposed to be renovated are boarded up and crumbling, eyesores in decaying neighborhoods.

The Post examined every major project currently funded under the HUD program, analyzing a database of 5,100 projects worth $3.2 billion, studying more than 600 satellite images and collecting information from 165 housing agencies nationwide. The yearlong investigation uncovered a dysfunctional system that delivers billions of dollars to local housing agencies with few rules, safeguards or even a reliable way to track projects. The lapses have led to widespread misspending and delays in a two-decade-old program meant to deliver decent housing to the working poor.

The Post found breakdowns at every level:

Local housing agencies have doled out millions to troubled developers, including novice builders, fledgling nonprofits and groups accused of fraud or delivering shoddy work.

Checks were cut even when projects were still on the drawing boards, without land, financing or permits to move forward. In at least 55 cases, developers drew HUD money but left behind only barren lots.

Overall, nearly one in seven projects shows signs of significant delay. Time and again, housing agencies failed to cancel bad deals or alert HUD when projects foundered.

HUD has known about the problems for years but still imposes few requirements on local housing agencies and relies on a data system that makes it difficult to determine which developments are stalled.

Even when HUD learns of a botched deal, federal law does not give the agency the authority to demand repayment. HUD can ask local authorities to voluntarily repay, but the agency was unable to say how much money has been returned.

A pattern of HUD projects stalled or abandoned - The Washington Post

and you think we have a revenue problem?

no more money for managers so morose
 
remember march 31 when no less than the gao found a full half trillion dollars of waste, "most of it in fiscal years 2009 to 2010 and going forward"

GAO Finds Massive Waste, Duplication - FoxBusiness.com

you wanna argue with the gao?

no more money for managers so miserable

seeya at the polls, progressives

bring a cardigan, it's gonna be cold
 
actually, we do have a revenue problem

our economy is so sluggish, incomes so down, property taxes so fractured...

the wisest and fastest solution to our revenue shortfall is to get some growth going on around here

and this guy will tell you how

In government, as in life, you can never solve a problem if you refuse to acknowledge it. We have the worst business tax climate in the nation, period. Our taxes are 66% higher than the national average. Upstate is truly an economic crisis. In real GDP, from 2001-2006, upstate New York grew about 1.7% per year while the average in the nation was 2.7%. The costs of pensions are exploding, 1.3 billion in 1998-1999, projected for 2013, 6.2 billion - a 476% increase and its only getting worse.

The State of New York spends too much money, it is that blunt and it is that simple. Our spending has far exceeded the rate of inflation. From 1994-2009, inflation was about 2.7% per year; medicaid when up over 5% per year and education went up over 6% per year. We just can’t afford those rates of increase. State spending actually outpaced income growth. State spending increased just under 6%, personal income growth was only 3.8%.

And most damaging, our expenses in this state far exceed revenue. We’ve been focusing on this year and the deficit this year, which is a very large deficit about $10 billion, and that is a problem and it is a major problem. Next year, the problem goes to $14 billion. The year after, the deficit goes to $17 billion. This is not a one year problem my friends. This is a fundamental economic realignment for the State of New York. You look at the chart, you look at the arrows and this is an unsustainable rate of growth and it has been for a long time.

Not only to we spend too much, but we get too little in return. We spend more money on education than any state in the nation and we are number 34 in terms of results. We spend more money on Medicaid than any other state in the nation and we are number 21 in results. We spend about $1.6 billion per year in economic development and we are number 50 in terms of results.

And the large government we have is all too often responsive to the special interests, over the people of the State of New York. The proof is in the pudding. And New Yorkers are voting with their feet. Two million New Yorkers have left the State over the past decade. What does this say? It says we need radical reform, it says we need a new approach, we need a new perspective and we need it now. This is a fundamental realignment for the state. You can’t make up these kinds of savings over this long of period of time through a budget cutting or trimming exercise. We are going to redesign our approach because the old way wasn’t working anyway, let's be honest.

What made New York the Empire State was a not a large government complex, it was a vibrant private sector that was creating great jobs in the State of New York that’s what made us the Empire State once and that’s what’s going to make us the Empire State again. At the heart of this State is business. And we have to relearn the lesson our founders knew and we have to put up a sign that says New York is open for business. We get it. And this is going to be a business friendly State.

Next, we are going to have to confront the tax situation in our State. The property taxes in New York are killing New Yorkers. Thirteen of the sixteen highest tax counties are in New York when assessed by home value. In absolute dollars, Westchester County has the highest property taxes in the United States of America. Nassau County has the second highest property taxes in the United State of America. It has to end, it has to end this year. We have to hold the line on taxes for now and reduce taxes in the future. New York has no future as the tax capital of the nation. Our young people will not stay. Our business will not come.

Put it simply the people of this state simply cannot afford to pay any more taxes, period. We need to transform our budget. We need to hold the line on taxes, we need a state spending cap and we need to close this $10 billion gap without any borrowing.

GOVERNOR ANDREW M. CUOMO STATE OF THE STATE ADDRESS | Governor Andrew M. Cuomo

go, cuomo, go!
 
Oh come on man....What the hell do you expect in a political forum. Sometimes you people really amaze me in the leaps and back bending exercises you pull off. Partisan? of course it is. I got a hint for ya, if it weren't this site would fail. It would be NO fun at all. You get mad at someone's partisanship, when in all the years I have been contributing to these sites I have been consistent in my beliefs, and approach. To the point of never changing my name so that people know exactly who I am. Can you say the same Mr. Case? Mr. Independent? Mr. Moderate? Or what ever affiliation you hide your belief system behind?

I'm openly anti-federalist, but no anti-federalist option exists, so I chose the independent lean.

I'm feel that I'm one of the most consistent proponents of "small government" around. My views about how my local and state government should be run do not affect my views of how the federal government should work. I actually promote staying true to the hierarchal system as it was designed. I don't allow my personal views of the singular issues to influence my beliefs about how government should work.

Unlike most supposed small government conservatives, I do not make exceptions for federal usurptation of power simply because these usurptations coincide with my personal views on the issue.

So when somebody who is simply parroting mindless partisan nonsense attempts to call my points revisionism, I tend to treat their arguments as they deserve to be treated. Don't like it? then don't call my points revisionism while simply parroting mindless partisan nonsense.

Carter was a disaster. I lived through his misery, and hope to never see that crap again. So, instead of hold up for the moment the WORST President to ever fart in that chair, go back and study where the country was at that time with honest eyes, if you can, and then call someone partisan....What a joke.

More mindless partisan drivel. If you could get over your hurt feelings about the Carter years, then maybe you can actually lay claim to viewing things with "honest eyes".

I mean, anyone who doesn't see how Ford, Nixon, and Johnson constributed to the mess that was present duringthe carter administration is clearly not looking at things with "honest eyes". Conversely, anyone who ignores how some of Carter's choices actually contributed to the success that Reagan enjoyed (one of note being the appointment of Volcker, who was good enough at what he did to be kept by reagan for the majority of this two terms) is also not capable of saying they are viewing things with honest eyes.

An honest assesment (i.e. one devoid of the typical vaginal weepings about how "horrible" everything was while Carter was in office) that actually looks at the causes of the problems (many of which stem form Johnson and Nixon's administrations) and how many of the problems of that time were solved (Volckers forced recession by increasing interest rates) as well as the effects that would have occured if some of Carter's ideas were implemented or adhered to (energy especially) would come to the conclusion that Carter actually had some pretty good ideas, although he often ****ed up during the implementation stage and some of his best moves were responses to some of his worst ones (Volcker is a prime example of this).

He wasn't a great president by any stretch but he is certainly not nearly as bad as the talking heads make him out to be.
 
So, what lean is Tucker? Whenever I've noticed him, he was supporting the free market; I don't recall other standpoints.

I'm a Neo-anti-federalist (a term of my own invention). Many people have trouble figuring out my lean because I have different beliefs abotu what I think State and Local government should do from what I believe the Federal government should do.

I may argue in favor of something philosophically because I support my State of local government taking those actions, but I would oppose the federal goverment doing the same thing. A good example is legalized abotion. I'm against Roe v Wade and I believe that it should be overturned, but I am also ardently pro-choice and I would absolutley oppose Illinois passing laws against abortion.
 
see, that's my idea too, but the government gets in the way.
 
why do we need to government to tell us where and how to get our energy?

To prevent the Chinese and the rest of the world from getting too far ahead of us in economic growth due to the cheap alternative energy sources they are developing. To do otherwise is to knowingly continue to undermine our own economy by keeping it dependent on ever more costly oil.
 
why in the world should we think that having our incompetent overbureaucratic, politically oriented and misincentivized federal government running our energy policy will help us achieve economic growth? that has been the precise opposite of our experience.
 
We should put a 50% tariff on anything that is coming into this country and F China:roll:

You know what? Do you think these other countries would allow us to pretty much undercut their industry? Can I get a hell no and can I get a F China?

Do we really wish to sit back and allow China to be the World Leader? Are we just suppose to sit back and watch it happen? I don't think so but guess what? We have allowed this to happen. Wake the Hell Up People of the USA!

Bring Back the REAL American Dream: you know the one that included us having our own jobs and did not include letting some other country get ahead of us. Shame on us and mostly: Shame on the U.S. government.

Maybe our gov is willing for us to be a country to where our Dollar is NOT worth the paper it is printed on? But I am not!

China is almost a kind of enslaved nation and we have allowed it to get this far? Oh hell no.

WTH were we/USA thinking?
 
We should put a 50% tariff on anything that is coming into this country and F China:roll:

:thumbs: good idea! Screw poor people!
 
:thumbs: good idea! Screw poor people!

No. This would not hurt poor people it would make big biz in this country keep it here and they would have no choice of making things people can afford. Sorry if you find my idea not good. I admit I am no expert.


Khrushchev said something like we will never have to fire a shot to conquer America and it seems he was correct as if we keep on this road of destroy? He is right. Sadly other people are taking over and will destroy thr USA is we allow it.


What do you think China is doing to us? They are gonna destroy us and they need no weapons. We are letting em do it!
 
Last edited:
No. This would not hurt poor people

actually it would. you see, poor people have less money. this means that they are more vulnerable to things like price increases. What do we import from China? quite a bit - basically we import Wal-Mart. Of course, poor people shop at Wal-Mart, because that's where they can buy things cheaper, which increases their standard of living. Raise the price of Wal-Mart = lower their standard of living.

And that's just the immediate effect. :) Instantly increased prices will reduce the available capital stock of everyone, which means that capital which is available for investment and growth will instantly shrink, and businesses (which have spent the last 3 years belt-tightening to the bone) will begin to have to engage in massive layoffs. and that's just our general businesses - businesses which depend upon imports from China will have to do this immediately. As more people (and we are talking millions - again, starting with the poor people, as they are generally the ones with the least critical job skills and which businesses can therefore most easily afford to let go) are tossed from the employment rolls onto the social security net, government spending will reexplode, necessitating another massive expansion of borrowing or tax hikes which will further reduce the available stock of capital which will necessitate further firings, which will necessitate further spending on the social safety net which will necessitate further borrowing or taxing....

...and the whole thing becomes a death spiral until we finally reach that brutal cut-off point where we just have to start throwing millions of Americans, who are already poor, off the system, into a world in which the cost of living has dramatically spiked and they have no resources, and hope they don't starve to death.

and we're not to the worst part yet :D you see, China is the largest foreign holder of our dollars and our debt. This means that whenever they want to, they can destroy the American ability to borrow and the American ability to buy. It will cost them heavily, which is why they don't. BUT, thanks to our brilliant "tax them at 50%" scheme, we have initiated a trade war - which means that they are already staring those losses in the face and they have nothing to lose and quite a bit to gain by destroying the US Economy.

SO, they dump their bonds and their dollars, which means the cost of borrowing for the US shoots prohibitively high overnight even as our dollar collapses. Social Security? Medicare? Government Functioning? Defense? Welfare? we depend on Borrowing to keep these things running at their current pace. now, in the long term, we obviously have to bring those costs down to manageable levels, and there are many plans on how to go about doing that over decades.... but now - thanks to our genius tariff idea - we have to do it immediately. Say goodbye to the federal government, because much of it is going away. Social Security and Medicare will immediately be cut roughly by one-third to one-half, Welfare will be gone, Agriculture gone, Education gone, 80% of the military gone, NASA gone, foodstamps gone, WIC gone.... you get the idea.

most people will probably survive without the programs; but many of our elderly poor will probably die.


but hey! at least we got to give the middle ****ing finger to china, eh?!? YEAH! stickittoem! wooh! :thumbs:


it would make big biz in this country keep it here and they would have no choice of making things people can afford. Sorry if you find my idea not good. I admit I am no expert.

:) sorry if i sounded like a sarcastic a-hole above, I don't mean to attack you here, just the idea that we can help ourselves by destroying large sectors of our own economy.

What do you think China is doing to us?

I think that they are sitting on our debt, shifting to short-term paper so that they can dump us with minimized pain if they need to, and taking advantage of US fiscal irresponsibility in order to set themselves up to expand their relative power in the region.

do you really want to screw over China? Balance the budget. An America which can no longer be threatened by their ability to dump debt and dollars is an America with a much freer international hand.
 
why in the world should we think that having our incompetent overbureaucratic, politically oriented and misincentivized federal government running our energy policy will help us achieve economic growth? that has been the precise opposite of our experience.


How has the absence of an energy policy helped stop our spiraling up of world oil prices over the last decade as we approached peak oil? Do you realize how detrimental our high energy cost is to all aspects of our economy?
 
Well cpwill, that is a whole lot to take in but am pretty sure somewhere in there my point was to balance the budget and kind of take our country back. Do I really wish to tell China f you? That would be correct:)

Or should we simply keep allowing them to ship us crap goods, end jobs all the while killing us with their toxic cheap crap as they pretty much take over our place in the World? Nah. We have allowed them to screw us with toxic lead objects in every orifice for way too long.

Sure it will be tough at first but we can do this. I am not one that wishes to sit back as I watch MY country slip to #2.. If you are? That is fine too. I am not mad at ya.
I am no economist expert and only wish the best for the U.S.A.
 
How has the absence of an energy policy helped stop our spiraling up of world oil prices over the last decade as we approached peak oil?

oh, we've had an energy policy. our energy policy has been to reduce supply, thereby enabling that price spiral.

Do you realize how detrimental our high energy cost is to all aspects of our economy?

yup. that's why i'm hoping that the President is serious this time around.
 
Well cpwill, that is a whole lot to take in but am pretty sure somewhere in there my point was to balance the budget and kind of take our country back. Do I really wish to tell China f you? That would be correct:)

China considers themselves our foe - we would be fools not to take them at their word. But attempting to tell them F You in a manner that merely destroys us more and leaves them in charge is poor strategy.

Balancing the Budget would immediately give us the ability to turn China's current fiscal advantage into a disadvantage. The old saying goes that if you borrow $100,000, the bank owns you. But if you borrow $100 million, you own the bank (ie, they are dependent on you being good for it). If we were to get to a position where we could legitimately continue to fund our government without economic shocks without borrowing, then we would be able to turn China's debt into a liability for her. Go ahead, China, send another missile over Taiwan. Every time you do, we simply renig on 25% of the bonds you currently hold. Yes, the price of our bonds will fall through the floor as rates spiral. But since we won't be selling any more, we won't care. In addition, balancing the budget and reforming our entitlements will allow us greater latitude to further develop our relationships with our natural allies in the region - India, Australia, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan; in an effort to create a Asian version of NATO to hold back the Asian version of the USSR. In the meantime? Them artificially depressing their currency only keeps their people poorer and makes our people richer. Let them continue in this idiotic 21st century mercantilism.

I want the best for the U.S. too. That's why I don't want to destroy our economy pursuing some kind of "race to the bottom" competition to see which government can screw their own people more. That's a game we lose against a dictatorship.
 
China considers themselves our foe - we would be fools not to take them at their word. But attempting to tell them F You in a manner that merely destroys us more and leaves them in charge is poor strategy.

Balancing the Budget would immediately give us the ability to turn China's current fiscal advantage into a disadvantage. The old saying goes that if you borrow $100,000, the bank owns you. But if you borrow $100 million, you own the bank (ie, they are dependent on you being good for it). If we were to get to a position where we could legitimately continue to fund our government without economic shocks without borrowing, then we would be able to turn China's debt into a liability for her. Go ahead, China, send another missile over Taiwan. Every time you do, we simply renig on 25% of the bonds you currently hold. Yes, the price of our bonds will fall through the floor as rates spiral. But since we won't be selling any more, we won't care. In addition, balancing the budget and reforming our entitlements will allow us greater latitude to further develop our relationships with our natural allies in the region - India, Australia, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan; in an effort to create a Asian version of NATO to hold back the Asian version of the USSR. In the meantime? Them artificially depressing their currency only keeps their people poorer and makes our people richer. Let them continue in this idiotic 21st century mercantilism.

I want the best for the U.S. too. That's why I don't want to destroy our economy pursuing some kind of "race to the bottom" competition to see which government can screw their own people more. That's a game we lose against a dictatorship.

Nah, all we have to do to stop china in their tracks..is to pull all our corporations that made china what it is...out of china and back here...that would end china dominance, it would end unemployment and fix the fiscal probs here...we have alot to thank our corporations for cpwill...china is probably at the top of the list.
 
Back
Top Bottom