• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama to speak on birth certificate

The proof is found in the absence of proof to the contrary. No one can say with any amount of certainty that waterboarding contributed to locating bin Laden and the article I posted highlighted all those involved with giving up information and none of them had been waterboarded.

Bush had 8 years to get OBL and failed. Obama got him in 2¼.

Where is the proof waterboarding did not bring the information?

Officials: CIA interrogators at secret prisons developed first strands that led to bin Laden | StarTribune.com
 
This issue was so stupid in my eyes. I honestly could care less if a presidential candidate was born in another country. Has that requirement ever been explained on any logical/rational grounds or do people just seem to blindly accept it because it's in the divine holy ass constitution? Which is actually amendable if you haven't noticed.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
The proof can be found somewhere at sea ... at least what's left of him that wasn't eaten by fish.

So than it is opinions not fact. The usual claims about Obama that have no facts or substance
Only if it's opinion, and not fact, that OBL's lifeless body was dumped at sea.

I disagree with that, but I really don't care. Still, it was Obama who succeeded where Bush had failed America.
 
Well it seems not all was false or this is more left wing deception

Can you cite some actual, factual information that was received and led to the demise of Bin Laden, or are you just grasping at partisan straws and repeating what you heard on rant radio?
 
Well it seems not all was false or this is more left wing deception

LOL! It is the right that is making the wild claims, so what do they give as proof? Did they ID Bin Ladens compound under Bush? What did they offer up? Balls in your court.:lol:
 
Can you cite some actual, factual information that was received and led to the demise of Bin Laden, or are you just grasping at partisan straws and repeating what you heard on rant radio?

I believe that would be a national security issue. Can you show what Obama did to make this happen?
 
Thanks to Bush policies and the military. Obama did little if anything

Again: Bush gave up on UBL and said he was not worried about him anymore. Show some respect for Obama.
 
LOL! It is the right that is making the wild claims, so what do they give as proof? Did they ID Bin Ladens compound under Bush? What did they offer up? Balls in your court.:lol:



Show me the answers to your questions. Show the proof of how Obama made this happen
 
Again: Bush gave up on UBL and said he was not worried about him anymore. Show some respect for Obama.

Show proof Bush stopped looking for him. The CIA says information came during Bush Presidency
 
What a tool. When Obama took office he doubled the effort to get Bin Laden. His number one concern was getting him. Bush was not concerned with Bin Laden and thought he was living in a cave for crying out loud. Bin Laden had ten years of life he shouldn't have had thanks to Junior. You nutjobs can try to give credit to Bush but he deserves none of it.

Exactly. I see now that they have their talking points from right wing media they are coming out of the woodwork to try to bash our wonderful POTUS. It will never work though:mrgreen:
 
Show me the answers to your questions. Show the proof of how Obama made this happen
Here, from the Constitution ...
Article II, Section. 2.

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States
... No one but the Commander in Chief could give the order to Navy Seals to assassinate bin Laden.
 
Show proof Bush stopped looking for him. The CIA says information came during Bush Presidency
If that were true, bin Laden would have been killed years ago.
 
Exactly. I see now that they have their talking points from right wing media they are coming out of the woodwork to try to bash our wonderful POTUS. It will never work though:mrgreen:

His own words and actions bash him
 
Here, from the Constitution ...
Article II, Section. 2.

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States
... No one but the Commander in Chief could give the order to Navy Seals to assassinate bin Laden.

The generals could if Obama gave them authority, Problem is then Obama could not use it for politics as he is now
 
Why? the timing has to be right. Intell is a slow process

Bush totally screwed up the hunt for Bin Laden. He even thought he was living in a cave and he wasn't all that concerned about him. What a moron. Yet you Bush loving fools still try to horn in on the credit. Obama doubled the effort to get Bin Laden when he took office. That's what got him.
 
Back
Top Bottom