• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Violence in another Mc Donalds almost kills customer

A suspect's comment is not a full statement of facts. If the suspect said that she thought the victim was a vampire and was trying to suck blood from her first, would you believe that? The victim says something completely different. The article clearly states that the police had not yet established a motive. Despite your opinion, she was actually a "she." Gender reassignment surgery means that she is functionally a woman, not a man. She has the physical traits of a woman, she thinks of herself as a woman and she likes the opposite sex. This would appear to make her straight, rather than homosexual. This line of the topic is irrelevant, however. The fact remains that what was done to her has no justification, just as there is no moral justification for the individuals who stood by and did nothing to help, regardless of their skin color.

Whether gender reassaignment surgery actually changes someones sex is a matter of opinion. There are many people, some on this thread even, who feel that it was just a man who had his pee pee cut off.

However, I find it quite interesting that you are demanding facts for my statement that the fight was over the use of the bathroom, when I have even shown that there was a police report that said so, yet you never asked for any evidence whatsoever from the original poster to verify his claims that the attack was racially motivated. Why the singling out?
 
[video]http://video.foxnews.com/v/4663565/[/video]

For Red Eye Fans
Greg Gutfeld on The McDonald's "Hate Crime"
 
The Stormfront comment was a reference I was making to the style of thread this is, not a factual statement and you know that. As for the bathroom, as I said before, you obviously didn't read the link because it says "The police report does not provide a motive but quotes one of the suspects saying that the fight was "over using a bathroom." As for homosexual, we know that "she" was actually a "he" and other posters have shown links to articles that state the "he" was flirting with one of the black girls boyfriends. So that means "he" would be a homosexual.

Ah a stormfront reference, how very typical. I can see your dilemma. You don't know who's side to be on, the females of the of the African-American persuasion (the perps); or the female of the transgendered persuasion (the victim). So, when in doubt blame the conservative that would proactively come to the aid a a fellow human being. Throw a racist skin head reference in for extra points.

Oh and anyone with a little bit of sense would know that the boyfriend thing was a very lame attempt at deflection.
 
Whether gender reassaignment surgery actually changes someones sex is a matter of opinion. There are many people, some on this thread even, who feel that it was just a man who had his pee pee cut off.

However, I find it quite interesting that you are demanding facts for my statement that the fight was over the use of the bathroom, when I have even shown that there was a police report that said so, yet you never asked for any evidence whatsoever from the original poster to verify his claims that the attack was racially motivated. Why the singling out?

I already answered this. The police report says nothing of the kind, a suspect was reported to have said that. Again, you believe the testimony of one of the suspects, without question? AGAIN, race was mentioned in the original article. You are the one who came in here with the unsubstantiated claims, so I simply asked you to back them up, which have clearly proved you have no intention of doing. You make it sound as though I'm taking sides against you, when clearly I've not sided with anyone, but rather just offered my opinion on the topic at hand.

Gender reassignment changes the person's gender, this is not disputable, regardless of what your opinion is.
 
This is so offtopic. How about you boys take your little "man" toys to another thread.

Last time I went to a rifle range there were two women there firing an AR-15.

I guess that's a "girl" toy.
 
I hope McDonald's gets some horrible press for this. It's excruciating to watch. You know there had to be three or more employees in the place. We see one man's half-hearted chicken-**** attempt to stop it...we see a man's taking a video...there is no excuse on the freakin' earth for this to have gone on as long as it did. I heard no one yell, "I called the cops--they're on their way." This is heartbreaking. She's having seizures and still no one bends down to comfort her. Makes me ashamed to be a human being.

Was it racial? Who the hell knows?? The only thing we know for absolute sure is that the two black women were thugs. I sure hope they went to jail.

Once again Maggie you're spot on.
 
Back
Top Bottom