Ocean City
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 14
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
A suspect's comment is not a full statement of facts. If the suspect said that she thought the victim was a vampire and was trying to suck blood from her first, would you believe that? The victim says something completely different. The article clearly states that the police had not yet established a motive. Despite your opinion, she was actually a "she." Gender reassignment surgery means that she is functionally a woman, not a man. She has the physical traits of a woman, she thinks of herself as a woman and she likes the opposite sex. This would appear to make her straight, rather than homosexual. This line of the topic is irrelevant, however. The fact remains that what was done to her has no justification, just as there is no moral justification for the individuals who stood by and did nothing to help, regardless of their skin color.
Whether gender reassaignment surgery actually changes someones sex is a matter of opinion. There are many people, some on this thread even, who feel that it was just a man who had his pee pee cut off.
However, I find it quite interesting that you are demanding facts for my statement that the fight was over the use of the bathroom, when I have even shown that there was a police report that said so, yet you never asked for any evidence whatsoever from the original poster to verify his claims that the attack was racially motivated. Why the singling out?