I understand, np here... and btw, I didn't like the way Clark was interviewed, nor did I like the interview Clark gave.Those videos were more for comic relief and comparison than anything else. What Obama said to that reporter pales in comparison to these guys' reactions, that's why I put em there.
I commented on how Bush dealt with reporters who gave rude, partisan or unfair interviews, and you posted a video of an Iraqi reporter throwing a shoe at him, along with a picture that depicts people honoring that event.
So, have you relieved all that pent up political anger of yours and gotten the Bush Bashing out of the way for today, or should we expect to see a few more partisan, off topic attacks on GW??
Wanting to be able to finish one's thoughts and sentences warrants a comparison to Al Capone? Are you kidding me? Turn off the ****ing Limbaugh and Beck... unreal. It's like a pack of piranhas that will feast on anything regardless of how much of it is just trash.
Ted Cruz is the dumbest person alive.
again, you misrepresent what you actually said. so, (once again) let's do see what you actually posted:
if you will look at it again (the video has been provided twice already) you will see how bushdeal[t] with hostile members of the media
just as you presented
So you think you should be able to just post anything and attribute it to your opposition whether true or not, as long as it scathingly mocks, and ridicules your opponent....? And you think that is an honorable way to debate?I have never heard of this rule before, and it's a BS rule as far as I am concerned.
Sure you did, and although you didn't direct it at a person, you generalized which is worse.I didn't make my statement personal, nor was it directed at anybody. I explained myself in that statement.
See, that is your problem. You think because the reporter didn't ask softball questions of your hero Obama, that he is biased. Yet, if the roles are reversed, would I be correct in assuming that a liberal media person asking questions of a conservative, and not allowing that conservative to get away with skewing the facts is a biased PoS and out to get him as well?I assume the journalist is biased, and that the journalist thinks Obama is all bad.
No, I don't think he is evil either, I disagree with how he fundamentally sees this country, and her place in the world, and I think that his policies are ruiness for this country, and I also think that he outright lies to avoid the tough stances, and decisions he has made.I personally don't think there is any reason to be afraid of the president or think he is evil.
No, I can't stand listening to him because he is a liar. And I don't need some 20 minute lecture to answer a 30 second question. As for knowing who he is, the time for that was in 2007, but you libs did your best to help him hide that didn't you?If you can't handle listening to the president explain his decisions and why he made them, in his own words, they you really don't know who he is. Part of interviewing the president, is learning who he really is and what drives him.
Crazy? no. Hateful, absolutely! He is very transparent in holding grudges. As for sounding insane? I guess that is a matter of what you think of his policies isn't it?The president isn't crazy or hateful. He doesn't sound insane like Ahmadinejad when he talks.
Well, you'd be dead wrong. See, that is the problem with you assuming anything. Although I think that Obama is purposely withholding his long form BC, because it is a distraction, and a way to paint with a broad brush his opposition, just like you attempted here, but I called you on, I am more so interested in his upbringing, whom influenced him at a young age, his schooling, and his grades and papers, what he thought, who he really is.I can only assume you're a birther, otherwise, you wouldn't have taken so much offense to my statement..
But you go ahead and cling to bomb throwing of sorts like you tried here, and I am sure that more accolades like the one from Bubba will emerge, and your position on the far left will be staked out for you.