Are people under the impression that nobody currently checks where a president is born?
One of you will end up here next!
So our political process is to rely on tabloid news?Secondly, given the amount of information and digging into a candidates life there's no way a non-natural citizen is going to become President.
That contradicts your "secondly" position. First you say that someone (we don't know who) will dig into the past of a Presidential candidate and that will be the best way to prevent an unqualified candidate from reaching office. Then you say anyone that does look into that is delusional. Now, which is it?Thirdly, anyone who thinks a President candidate, or the actual President, was born in another country is delusional and won't be satisfied by any amount of fact or any documents.
What checks are there? Tabloid news and delusional conspiracy theorists?Therefore is just a waste of money and amounts to nothing more than politicians feeding on the irrational fears of some, hopefully not many, of their potential voters and thus encouraging them which is entirely counter productive.
To introduce an additional check before someone is placed on a ballot, and thus possibility become President, enforces the idea that there aren't sufficient enough checks to ensure a Constitutionally ineligible person is not elected, which there certainly are. Like I said, feeds and encourages irrational fears and ignorance amongst the people.
You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love.For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
Originally Posted by johnny_rebson:
These are the same liberals who forgot how Iraq attacked us on 9/11.
It is up to the registrar of voters for each state to submit valid poll results. Not one of them was shown evidence of Obama's citizenship. Not one.
You tools were too gullible to keep our constitution.