- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 11,265
- Reaction score
- 2,921
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
That's funny, nowhere in that section of the law you posted does it state what you claimed it states, that being Arizona will accept a short form, but with additional information. What it does say is that 2 or more of the forms they identify can be used as evidence in lieu of a long form certificate. That's what I said it states.If you read the bill, you'll see that AZ will except the Hawaiian short form COLB as evidence, but Obama will need addition information to get on the ballot.
Check out the Antenori amendment to the bill below:
"The Antenori floor amendment to the Government Reform Committee amendment inserts language regarding a presidential candidate who does not possess a long form birth certificate. A candidate would be able to include two or more of the following:
a) baptismal or circumcision certificate
b) hospital birth record
c) postpartum medical record
d) early census record.
Additionally, a candidate would also be able to submit a notarized affidavit from two or more persons who witnessed the candidates birth."
So Obama can show his alleged short form, And one more of those listed above either a, c, or d. or he can show a long form that Hawaii issues.
They won't accept a certified short form which states where a person was born but they will accept a certification of circumcision, even though circumcisions that come with certificates occur 8 days after the baby was born. The baby could have been born anywhere.