Yes, Mubarek was a typical 3rd world dictator. Stealing, putting his buddies and family in positions of power and seeking to maintain power, not benefit the people. The reality is little different than most autocratic rulers for the whole of human history. The names change and the details of how they rule, but the result for most people...it's the same Bullshytz
The difference is that Mubarek did more good, than harm. He was no worse than Qaddafi, Hussein (Syria and Iraq), etc, and in most respects, better.