And no she did not only "neglect" to report it to the AP but also to the official source. She admits she did not check her numbers as she should have because the result "looked correct".. basically she is a lazy piece of **** who should not have anything to do with elections. And that is the problem.. she neglected to check the numbers first and then suddenly decided to check them when her candidate was loosing and miraculously found many votes that put her candidate into the lead. That is why people smell a rat.. it might have been an honest mistake, but on the face of it, it looks and stinks like rigging an election for your candidate.... especially considering she has a history of doing so. We are again back to.. a total lack of checks and balances. No single person should have so much "power" over the election system.
No because back then the US election system had integrity.... that kinda went out the window in 2000. Now the US election system resembles more a 3rd world banana republic than a cornerstone western Democracy.Did we have a recount when "Dewey beat Truman"??