• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama announces his Candidacy for 2012.

You're absolutely right. Obama has not done enough to fix the economy. He let those tax cuts for the super rich continue, he lets corporations have all their loopholes, he didn't end the wasteful spending on war, hasn't pushed enough for renewable energy sources... He really hasn't done enough. Of course, name a republican who would do any of these things at all, let alone more of them...

I will be happy to answer that when you explain to me how you keeping more of what you earn is an expense to the govt. since the super rich keeping more of what they earn apparenlty is.
 
What does that have to do with the thread topic. Reagan isn't on the ballot, Bush isn't on the ballot but Obama and his results are. Tell the 15 million unemployed and the great grandkids that Obama record deserves re-election. All you have is demonizing Reagan and Bush to divert from Obama. The Obama record speaks for itself. Increasing jobs from the dismal 2009 numbers isn't a great record to tout especially at the cost created to generated those results. By the way, when did Federal Income Taxes go up under Reagan? His 10-10-5% tax cuts grew govt. revenue. Let me know when Obama actually grows revenue by increasing enough jobs to justify the expenses?

Well Obama kind of inherited that Reaganomics ****.. and well it's Reagan's fault. :lol:
 
today:

Companies in the U.S. added fewer workers than forecast in May, a sign that job growth is struggling to gain momentum, data from a private report based on payrolls showed today.

Employment increased by 38,000 last month, the smallest increase since September, from a revised 177,000 in April, according to figures from ADP Employer Services. The median estimate in the Bloomberg News survey called for a 175,000 advance for May.

Such gains in employment are insufficient to help the world’s largest economy accelerate after a surge in food and fuel costs earlier this year. Businesses added 207,000 jobs last month after a 268,000 gain in April and the jobless rate dipped to 8.9 percent from 9 percent, economists project a Labor Department report to show in two days.

ADP: U.S. Added Fewer Workers in May - Bloomberg

seeya at the polls, progressives
 
cnbc's take:

U.S. private-sector payroll growth slowed sharply in May, falling to the lowest level in eight months and prompting some economists to lower forecasts for job growth in Friday's U.S. government report.

The ADP Employment Services report is the latest in a string of data suggesting economic growth remained sluggish early in the second quarter after hitting a soft patch in the first months of the year. The economy grew at a tepid 1.8 percent annual rate in the first three months of the year, softer than analysts originally anticipated.

The ADP report showed private employers added a scant 38,000 jobs last month, falling from a downwardly revised 177,000 in April and well short of expectations for 175,000. It was the lowest level since September 2010.

The report boded poorly for the key U.S. non-farm payrolls report at the end of the week. Credit Suisse lowered its estimate for Friday's employment number to 120,000 from its previous forecast of 185,000 and its private payroll estimate to 135,000 from 200,000.

U.S. stock indexes opened lower open following the ADP report.

A separate report showed the number of planned layoffs at U.S. firms rose modestly in May with the government and non-profit sectors making up a large portion of the cuts.

Labor Market Worries Rise on Weak Private Sector Jobs Growth

govt sector layoffs---they're just beginning, and there're gonna be tens of thousands of em

party on, progressives
 
more bad news, today:

The pace of growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector tumbled in May, slackening more than expected to its slowest since September 2009, according to an industry report released Wednesday.

US Manufacturing Slowest since Sept, 09

let's sum up

yesterday we saw the housing DOUBLE DIP of the previous month drop even more steeply

yesterday we saw consumer confidence, no surprise, at a 6 month low, which was already deeply depressed

a record number of americans, 45 million, we learned yesterday, are on food stamps

but if you call barack the slasher a "food stamp president" folks like mr ed schultz will scream you're a racist

food is fast becoming unaffordable, a generation of kids are getting used to top ramen 5 nites a week

gas prices are thru the roof and always climb in summer

and everyone from fox to msnbc is talking about "the historically weak recovery" which the usa today first pointed out about a week and a half ago and is surely linked somewhere in the pages above

gdp in q1 was 1.8%

stimulus, anyone?

qe?

seeya at the polls, pals
 
THE RECORD

today:

The percentage of their homes that Americans own is near its lowest point since World War II, the Federal Reserve said Thursday. The average homeowner now has 38 percent equity, down from 61 percent a decade ago.

The latest bleak snapshot of the housing market came as mortgage rates hit a new a low for the year, falling below 4.5 percent for a 30-year fixed loan. But even alluring rates have failed to deliver any lift to the depressed housing industry.

Of the people who have mortgages, 23 percent are "under water," meaning they owe more on the mortgage than their home is worth, according to the private real estate research firm CoreLogic. An additional 5 percent are nearing that point.

The outlook for the housing market remains dim.

Fixed mortgage rates average 4.49 percent, extremely low by historical standards, and have fallen for eight straight weeks. But most people can't meet tougher lending requirements. Falling rates make it easier to refinance, too, but many of the people who can afford to do that already have.

And foreclosures keep hammering the housing market. On Thursday, the Obama administration said the three largest U.S. lenders - Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase - haven't helped enough people lower their mortgage payments to stay in their homes.

The government said it has started withholding the cash incentives it established for lenders under its 2-year-old foreclosure prevention program. The administration had hoped the program would prevent as many as 4 million foreclosures, but it has helped fewer than 700,000 people.

Many foreclosure sales have been delayed while federal regulators, state attorneys general and banks review how those foreclosures were carried out over the past two years. When those foreclosures go through, prices may fall even further.

The report found household debt declined at an annual rate of 2 percent from the previous quarter, mostly because of a decline in mortgage debt, which has fallen for 12 straight quarters.

But the decline is deceiving. Mortgage debt is coming down because so many Americans are defaulting on payments and losing their homes to foreclosure, not just because people are paying off loans.

"A lot of this debt reduction is not voluntary," said Dana Saporta, director of U.S. economics at Credit Suisse.

My Way News - Americans' equity in their homes near a record low

only 700,000 hamped, and half of those already redefaulted: Half of U.S. Home Loan Modifications Default Again - Bloomberg

party on, progressives
 
obama's america, continued

yesterday:

Those who earned (on average over the course of their careers) less than $11,700 per year, the lowest income quartile, would need to defer retirement till age 84 before 90% of those households would have just a 50% chance of affording retirement.

Those who earned between $11,700 and $31,200 will need to work till age 76 to have a 50% chance of covering basic expenses in retirement. Those who earned between $31,200 and $72,500 will need to work to age 72 to have a 50% chance and those who earned more than $72,500, those in the highest income quartile, catch a break; they get stop working at age 65 to have a 50/50 chance of funding their retirement.

WSJ: Many of us won't be able to retire until our 80's
 
Last edited:
oh please!

Obama has done many things to make he situation worse, but all of this was set in motion long before he became president.

Liberal social engineering and trying to create equal outcome in a free enterprise society has created a dependent class that really doesn't know how to take care of itself.
 
I don't plan to live to my 80's. Go, ME!
 
I'm gonna be 18 til I die :2razz:

My mom died shortly before her 75th birthday, and her mother died at age 70. I have high hopes that I'm not dragging around in diapers, no longer speaking English. If I start exhibiting signs of dementia, I have already granted myself permission to head outside and take a nap in a snow drift, during a blizzard.
 
today:

Through the 12 months ended in March of last year, 505,473 new businesses started up in the U.S., according to the latest data available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That's the weakest growth since the bureau started tracking the data in the early 1990s. It's down sharply from the record 667,341 new businesses added in the 12 months that ended in March 2006.

Weak start-up growth has dire implications for jobs because small and midsize businesses have driven employment gains in the U.S. for years. Between the recession that ended in late 2001 and the start of the most recent recession in late 2007, businesses that employed fewer than 500 workers added nearly 7 million employees, according to data collected by payroll provider ADP, which tracks employment trends.

[In contrast], businesses that employed 500 or more cut nearly a million positions over the same period, often because they sent jobs overseas. Smaller companies — think local restaurants, gas stations and mom-and-pop grocery stores — are far less likely to send jobs abroad. That's why they are crucial to the recovery, economists say.

Small-business employment growth has been waning in recent months. In May, businesses with less than 50 employees added 27,000 jobs, according to ADP. While that's an improvement over a gain of 14,000 a year ago, it's down sharply from the 84,000 jobs added in April and advances of more than 100,000 in December and January.

A huge concern for small businesses, says the NFIB's Dunkelberg, is lack of clarity about what will happen in the next year in Washington. With another round of elections coming up and rancorous debate on Capitol Hill, businesses are unsure about what policies will be enacted by the government.

"There's just a huge amount of uncertainty. And when you're uncertain, you don't make bets," he says.

Small businesses, crucial to growth, face challenges - USATODAY.com
 
oh please!

Obama has done many things to make he situation worse, but all of this was set in motion long before he became president.


Right...I am thinking back to the CRA....Now who was it that pushed that? Hmmmmm.....Or it could be when unions like the SEIU together with their criminal offshoot ACORN started picketing, and strong arming banks to lend to those that couldn't afford it....Or even better yet let's go back to the New Deal and FDR for setting in motion the entitlement class, and mentality in the first place telling generations of Americans that the American dream meant redistribution of wealth.

j-mac
 
last week wapo's factchecker vigorously waved a caution flag, putting a drag on obama's victory lap celebrating his "rescue" of the auto industry

President Obama's phony accounting on the auto industry bailout - The Fact Checker - The Washington Post

today:

President Barack Obama heads to an energy plant in North Carolina on Monday to talk once again about the job-creating power of a green economy.

The catch? Nearly three years into Obama's presidency, the White House can't point to much solid evidence that significant numbers of Americans are scoring the green jobs the president has been touting.

Obama's Council of Economic Advisers suggests 225,000 clean energy jobs were either created or preserved through the third quarter of 2010 thanks to more than $80 billion in the economic stimulus package. But those are estimates at best.

The White House figures 825,000 Americans should be building electric car batteries, retrofitting homes or doing other green collar work by the end of 2012. But that too is an extrapolation.

Green jobs success eludes President Obama - Darren Samuelsohn - POLITICO.com

meanwhile, how many jobs are epa regulations costing us?

Utility giant AEP says it will close five coal plants to comply with EPA regs - The Hill's E2-Wire
 
Last edited:
today:

Twenty-eight months after Congress passed President Obama’s signature economic stimulus law, and nearly one year after he declared the summer of 2010 to be “Recovery Summer,” 1.9 million fewer people are employed.

In February 2009, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that 141.7 million people were employed. By the end of May 2011 – the last month for which data are available – that number had fallen to 139.8 million, a difference of 1.9 million.

While the number of people with jobs has increased slightly from its low point during the recession – 137.9 million in December 2009 – those 1.9 million jobs have been lost despite $800 billion in stimulus spending.

This does not mean that the economy is not creating jobs, but rather that it is not creating jobs fast enough to keep up with a combination of layoffs and people entering the job market for the first time.

In a Washington Post op-ed, former White House chief economist Larry Summers noted that the percentage of the population that has a job has not improved, even though the economy is technically in recovery.

“From the first quarter of 2006 to the first quarter of 2011, the U.S. economy’s growth rate averaged less than 1 percent a year,” Summers wrote. “The fraction of the population working remains almost exactly at its recession trough, and recent reports suggest that growth is slowing.”

The fraction of the population with a job has in fact fallen in the 28 months since Congress passed the stimulus – down from 60.3 percent in February 2009 to 58.4 percent in May 2011.

1.9 Million Fewer Americans Have Jobs Today Than When Obama Signed Stimulus | CNSnews.com

party on, progressives
 
today:

It's official: The housing crisis that began in 2006 and has recently entered a double dip is now worse than the Great Depression.

Prices have fallen some 33 percent since the market began its collapse, greater than the 31 percent fall that began in the late 1920s and culminated in the early 1930s, according to Case-Shiller data.

According to Case-Shiller, which provides the most closely followed housing industry data, prices dropped 1.9 percent in the first quarter, a move that the firm interpreted as a clear double dip in prices.

Prices continue to tumble despite affordability, which by most conventional metrics is near historic highs.

The rate for a 30-year conventional mortgage is around 4.5 percent, just above the historic low of 4.2 percent in October 2010.

More than four in every five mortgages now require a down payment of 20 percent, and credit history standards have tightened. At the same time, foreclosures continue at a brisk pace, pushing more supply onto the market and pressuring prices downward.

It's Official: US Housing Worse Than Great Depression/CNBC

one of america-under-obama's problems is so many folks can't relocate, because they're too far underwater in their homes, to wherever the few jobs being created are

ie, too many nevadans and floridans simply CAN'T move to texas
 
The Prof, et al,

There is an unspoke truth.

(COMMENT)

We speak of the importance of "small business" because all the "big business" is gone."

No reinvestment in the US means no industrial advancement to keep US commerce and industry cost competative. US Steel is a classic example, but there are many others as well.

No one in Washington is interested in "Nation Building" America. We spend Billions on countries like Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan ... etc ... yet, not a dime on America.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
life under obama, continued:

When it comes to measuring the combination of unemployment and inflation, it doesn’t get much more miserable than this.

In fact, misery, as measured in the unofficial Misery Index that simply totals the unemployment and inflation rates, is at a 28-year high, reflective of how weak the economic recovery has been and how far there is to go.

The index, first compiled during the soaring inflation days of the 1970s by economist Arthur Okun, is registering a nausea-inducing 12.7—9.1 percent for unemployment and 3.6 percent for annualized inflation—a number not seen since 1983. The index has been above 10 since November 2009 and had been under double-digits from June 1993 through May 2008.

The good news, of course, is that the Fed-led Paul Volcker embarked on a highly successful inflation-slaying campaign that brought the level of misery down sharply through the rest of the ’80s recovery decade.

The bad news, of course, is all the bad news.

CNBC: Misery Index Worst in 28 Years

cnbc has just been beating the crap outta this president the last several weeks

worry
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom