Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: U.S.-led airstrikes to help al-Qaida?

  1. #11
    Sage
    PeteEU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 04:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,090

    Re: U.S.-led airstrikes to help al-Qaida?

    Any US air attack in the region including Afghanistan helps Al Q in some way. If just one more person joins up because of a US air attack, then they helped AL Q.
    PeteEU

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: U.S.-led airstrikes to help al-Qaida?

    Quote Originally Posted by PeteEU View Post
    Any US air attack in the region including Afghanistan helps Al Q in some way. If just one more person joins up because of a US air attack, then they helped AL Q.
    And there will then be those who are ready to help fight for democracy and freedom, so Al Q helps recruit good people to fught against them.. Of course this will not include the Swiss, Germans, or any other of the usual suspects.

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last Seen
    09-14-17 @ 08:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    879

    Re: U.S.-led airstrikes to help al-Qaida?

    Quote Originally Posted by rathi View Post
    Do you think members of Al Qaeda would hug a downed American pilot?
    Why not? It's their master. Al Qaida works for US. In Afghanistan, they fought against Russian, their name is Mujahideen. In Bosnia, they fought to split Yogoslavia, their name is freedom fighters. In US, they activate 911 attack to ordinary people to justify the war in Mid-east, their name is Al Qaida. One force with different names to fit different political demand.

    Bin Laden is a living plant.

    In 1990, Soviet bloc collapsed. US intelligence turned its resource which used to deal with Soviet bloc to the new target - Mid-east countries which are rich in natural resource. Bin Laden, an asset of the CIA in Afghanistan war(against Russian), was revived in this new project as a false flag - Islamic extremist. He went to Sudan first in 1991.

    The Sudanese offered to arrest Bin Laden and extradite him to Saudi Arabia .

    Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
    Saudi and US didn't take the offer with various excuse because Bin Laden is a living plant they deployed there.

    In 1995, Bin Laden tried to set up a connection with Saddam but was refused.

    Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida

    A September 2006 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Saddam was "distrustful of al Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al Qaida to provide material or operational support."

    The Senate report, citing an FBI debriefing of a senior Iraqi spy, Faruq Hijazi , said that Saddam turned down a request for assistance by bin Laden which he made at a 1995 meeting in Sudan with an Iraqi operative.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20...latchy/2875005
    Sudan may have felt the danger to accomodate Bin Laden. In May 1996, the Sudanese asked bin Laden to leave. He went to Afghan and stay there until now.

    In August 1998, Sudan and Afghanistan were bombed by US missiles.

    In 2001, after 911, Afghan, facing US invasion, made an offer but failed.

    Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
    * Taliban demand evidence of Bin Laden's guilt

    guardian.co.uk, Sunday 14 October 2001 22.19 BST

    Remember Osama?
    In Bin Laden's recent 20 years, the countries he went or tried to go, have something in common: They all have rich natural resources. Sudan and Iraq have oil. Afghan has rich mine. '

    Afghanistan to develop $3 trillion in mining potential
    DUBAI | Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:14pm
    Afghanistan to develop $3 trillion in mining potential | Reuters
    He didn't go to Yemen, Somali or Syria for his "revolution" because they are resource poor countries, not in US interest list. He didn't go to Saudi or Kuwait. Because they are US allies. He only went to Sudan, Afghan, or Iraq (intended to) because these three countries were not controlled by US at that time. As a living plant, he gave US the excuse to activate attack on these three countries. (Even Saddam realized that Bin Laden was a dangerous living plant and rejected him, Iraq at last was invaded with an unexisted WMD)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •