• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House denies regime change is part of Libya mission [edited]

It's meaningless that the guy who started the "Bush Lied" hoax admits he made it up?

Fake but true? Is that it?

Dan Rather tried that and it didn’t work for him either.

What's this guys name?
 
It's meaningless that the guy who started the "Bush Lied" hoax admits he made it up?

Fake but true? Is that it?

Dan Rather tried that and it didn’t work for him either.

You're argument is silly. That's why it is meaningless. A hoax usually can be shown false. The evidence however supports the assertion that Bush lied. There is no one who can admit it isn't true. There's nothing fake about it.

As for Rather, who was sloppy and let himself be fooled, his circumstances are quite different. The only thing shown false in his story was the document. So, you can throw Rather out. But, others did the work, and made the case without the fake documents. Rather's failings does not tarnish them.
 
What's this guys name?

He testified before the 2004 Senate pre-war intelligence committee. He admitted that the information he was giving the press to prove that "Bush Lied" was in fact not accurate.

Those false accusations (a hoax) started the bush lied screech from the left. It's still going on today as we can plainly see.
 
You're argument is silly. That's why it is meaningless. A hoax usually can be shown false. The evidence however supports the assertion that Bush lied. There is no one who can admit it isn't true. There's nothing fake about it.

As for Rather, who was sloppy and let himself be fooled, his circumstances are quite different. The only thing shown false in his story was the document. So, you can throw Rather out. But, others did the work, and made the case without the fake documents. Rather's failings does not tarnish them.

Not only did he make up a hoax, he gathered more evidence to suggest that Saddam's WMD efforts were ongoing.
 
He testified before the 2004 Senate pre-war intelligence committee. He admitted that the information he was giving the press to prove that "Bush Lied" was in fact not accurate.

Those false accusations (a hoax) started the bush lied screech from the left. It's still going on today as we can plainly see.

I don't see a name. As silly as your claim is, as maningless as it is, at least link something. It should be fun to see it. :coffeepap
 
Last edited:
He testified before the 2004 Senate pre-war intelligence committee. He admitted that the information he was giving the press to prove that "Bush Lied" was in fact not accurate.

Those false accusations (a hoax) started the bush lied screech from the left. It's still going on today as we can plainly see.
I also would like to know this guy's name.
 
He testified before the 2004 Senate pre-war intelligence committee. He admitted that the information he was giving the press to prove that "Bush Lied" was in fact not accurate.

Those false accusations (a hoax) started the bush lied screech from the left. It's still going on today as we can plainly see.

So he doesn't have a name? He should be pretty famous, right? What's his name?
 
Not only did he make up a hoax, he gathered more evidence to suggest that Saddam's WMD efforts were ongoing.

I'm sorry, but the evidence is al Libi, Curveball, and Chalaibi with his heros in error, and what we clearly knew about them. So, the he would have to be the CIA and the Bush administration. :lamo
 
I have never witnessed a cluster**** of government as I have with Obama and his administration's handling of Libya.

So today we're calling it a "kinetic military action"? What the hell is that?

This, after flipping back and forth on whether this is about regime change. This, after insisting that we're not at war, as if dropping hundreds of bombs on a country isnt war.

Obama has done the exact opposite of everything he claimed he'd do militarily when he ran for president. Everything. Then, he runs around like he's holding a hot potato trying to give the responsibility to anyone but America. Since when do we not lead in matters like this?

Obama looks like such a wuss. It's truly embarassing.
 
Last edited:
Not only did he do all of that, his wife helped him start yet another hoax about Bush deliberately outing a covert CIA agent in retaliation.

The man's name is Joe Wilson.
 
Not only did he do all of that, his wife helped him start yet another hoax about Bush deliberately outing a covert CIA agent in retaliation.

The man's name is Joe Wilson.

You fail, big time. Epic Fail. :lamo :lamo :lamo
 
Not only did he do all of that, his wife helped him start yet another hoax about Bush deliberately outing a covert CIA agent in retaliation.

The man's name is Joe Wilson.
You're placing all the blame for people saying that the Bush Admin misled the country on Joe Wilson?
StarTrekSpockFascinating1.jpg

I don't think I have heard that one before.
 
I have never witnessed a cluster**** of government as I have with Obama and his administration's handling of Libya.

So today we're calling it a "kinetic military action"? What the hell is that?

This, after flipping back and forth on whether this is about regime change. This, after insisting that we're not at war, as if dropping hundreds of bombs on a country isnt war.

Obama looks like such a wuss. It's truly embarassing.

It does look like chaos right now in Libya. 0bama is hopefully realizing he has to lead the free world on this one.

When the carriers show up I'll know he's finally realized that to remove Gaddafi it will take a bigger effort.

I'm willing to give 0bama a lot of room to find his feet. So far he's been less than encouraging.

We need to get behind him right now. Especially those like myself who previously found much to criticize about his Presidency.

He's getting this one right IMO. He must have the courage and will to see this through. We should support him.
 
Not only did he do all of that, his wife helped him start yet another hoax about Bush deliberately outing a covert CIA agent in retaliation.

The man's name is Joe Wilson.

Oh I see now.
 
You're placing all the blame for people saying that the Bush Admin misled the country on Joe Wilson?
StarTrekSpockFascinating1.jpg

I don't think I have heard that one before.

Even funnier than I thought it would be. ;)
 
I'm sorry, but the evidence is al Libi, Curveball, and Chalaibi with his heros in error, and what we clearly knew about them. So, the he would have to be the CIA and the Bush administration. :lamo

The entire intelligence community of the free world did not rely on these sources alone as you would know if you read the Senate report. In fact very little.
 
The entire intelligence community of the free world did not rely on these sources alone as you would know if you read the Senate report. In fact very little.
But who did use these sources to make a case for invading Iraq? Who could that be?
 
Joe Wilson started the "Bush Lied" hoax people.

Since then lots of people have tried to prove Bush made up, sexed up, or lied about WMD intelligence and each and every one of them have failed.

So have you.
 
It does look like chaos right now in Libya. 0bama is hopefully realizing he has to lead the free world on this one.

When the carriers show up I'll know he's finally realized that to remove Gaddafi it will take a bigger effort.

I'm willing to give 0bama a lot of room to find his feet. So far he's been less than encouraging.

We need to get behind him right now. Especially those like myself who previously found much to criticize about his Presidency.

He's getting this one right IMO. He must have the courage and will to see this through. We should support him.

This is the first issue in quite a while that I have seen both conservatives and liberals split on in their own parties. People are actually saying what they think instead of just following party lines (except Gingrich and a few others).

I am just glad we waited for a UN Resolution and support from the Arab League.
 
The entire intelligence community of the free world did not rely on these sources alone as you would know if you read the Senate report. In fact very little.

No, Bush did. His people did. Look at where the evidence presented came from. The free world did not buy Bush's argument. Most believed he had some left over wmds, not that he was growing and gathering. That silliness came from Chalibi and his heros in error, cruveball, and al Libi. You should read more. It is also why Feith was found to have inaproriately using intel.
 
I think thread has drifted from the OP.

The OP makes the case that Obama wants to install a democratic system.
The text quoted by the OP says differently.
 
Back
Top Bottom