• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Seeks UN Resolution Authorizing Strikes on Libya

Manc Skipper said:
The "invaders" weren't spending more than the next ten countries on arms at the time.
Click to expand...

And if the society that military protects, wants to spend the money there, as proven in those they elect to represent them in DC, then why do you have a problem with this?

j-mac
 
Dezaad said:
Sounds like conservatives would rather continue enriching the bloated military industry through government largesse and instead impoverish the middle and lower classes in their old age, gut the education system that has provided the prosperity we all enjoy, and let the poor die in the streets from disease and injury. This is their solution to the budget problems. Completely unsurprising, as I stated earlier. You do realize that when we become less prosperous through all this kind of stupidity that we will then have to cut the military budget after all, right? Or that the rich will be forced to pay a hugely progressive tax in order to support it?
Click to expand...
Do you have the courage to respond to my post #117 directed to you?
Feel free to counter my FACTS, with your FACTS, not liberal partisan ramblings, to make your case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom