• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama eyes 'common sense' US gun control

You come off like a knee-jerk liberal. Way to overreact to some common sense suggestions.:roll::roll:


If Sarah Palin had wrote it, you'd be holding it up, applauding her courage.:cool:

Seriously? You really believe that? The support for Palin would plummet if she was stupid enough to make a comment like that.
 
You come off like a knee-jerk liberal. Way to overreact to some common sense suggestions.:roll::roll:

Considering the anti-2nd amendment stance of many liberals, one who actually believes in the 2nd amendment as a right has every reason to worry when a lib says they want common sense gun control. common sense gun control to a lib means more infringements on the 2nd amendment.

If Sarah Palin had wrote it, you'd be holding it up, applauding her courage.:cool:


I pretty sure to Sarah Palin that common sense gun control would be free firearm safety and usage classes to youths, not more infringements on the 2nd amendment.
If Palin did mean common sense gun control the same way Obama or any other liberal means common sense gun control I would still speak out against her trying to **** on the 2nd amendment. I would speak out against anyone trying to **** on the 2nd amendment regardless if they are a conservative,liberal or what ever.

If you looked at any of my posts regarding Palin you would know that I am no fan of Palin.
 
Last edited:
HA "common sense" gun control, what a joke. The government thugs said I shouldve shown "common sense" when I shot the thug who tried to rob me a few years back.
 
And I always love to see the chimp in chief take a losing stance. Gotta wonder if he conjures up his ideas while cruising 18 holes.

Ed, you sound like another Stormwatcher who wondered over to DP hoping to recruit some conservatives.
 
Seriously? You really believe that? The support for Palin would plummet if she was stupid enough to make a comment like that.

I believe that the message doesn't matter, it's the messenger.
 
Proof positive that he doesn't want to win a second term.

I'm all for reasonable gun control... registration, CCW permits, keeping felons from legally owning guns, even licensing to make certain gun owners know how to use their weapons. I don't think every home is entitled to an AK or a street sweeper. However, I'm think Obama would like to go far beyond such "common-sense" niceties, since they are mostly already on the books. About the only thing I would be in favor of that isn't on the books is the private gun-sale/gun-show loopholes.

Obama has just swatted down a huge hornets' nest, and the hornests are already armed and waiting for him. What a political fruit loop.

Not that I care who wins in 2012. We've already had 8 years of hell, 2 years of empty mediocrity, and I see no "Never fear, him is here!" on the political horizon. We're pretty much screwed no matter what.
 
We told ya'll not to vote for Obama
 
I'm all for reasonable gun control... registration, CCW permits, keeping felons from legally owning guns, even licensing to make certain gun owners know how to use their weapons. I don't think every home is entitled to an AK or a street sweeper. However, I'm think Obama would like to go far beyond such "common-sense" niceties, since they are mostly already on the books.

Some of the restrictions you describe go way beyond common sense. Tell me, what makes your arbitrary restrictions to my civil right to an AK any better than Obama's arbitrary restrictions?

What part of fundamental right do you anti-gun nuts not understand?
 
Last edited:
I believe that the message doesn't matter, it's the messenger.

You obviously don't realize how firmly people who are pro-gun believe in the 2nd Amendment then.
 
I believe that the message doesn't matter, it's the messenger.
You honestly think Palin wouldn't get any **** from 2nd amendment advocates if she pushed for the same so called common sense gun control that Obama wants to push?
 
I'm all for reasonable gun controlregistration, CCW permits, keeping felons from legally owning guns, even licensing to make certain gun owners know how to use their weapons. I don't think every home is entitled to an AK or a street sweeper.

Other than keeping a weapon out of someone who is actually mentality screwed up there is no such thing as reasonable control. Who are you or anyone else to do decide if we lowly citizens cant have AK-47s? Government thugs can get copies, gang bangers, mobsters can get them but the lowly citizen cant? Why should a man who has served his debt to society get his right to defend himself be taken away from him?


We've already had 18 years of hell

Fixed for you
 
What part of fundamental right do you anti-gun nuts not understand?

The part where public safety comes into play. That trumps your second amendment right any day of the week. Why do you think you don't own a tank or a small nuclear device?
 
I'm all for reasonable gun control... registration

Illegal in my state as it violates the right to privacy.

CCW permits

Becoming illegal for the same reason.

keeping felons from legally owning guns

Vendors running names through NCIS? I can live with that.

even licensing to make certain gun owners know how to use their weapons.

Make sure you license your religion and political views, also.

I don't think every home is entitled to an AK
Even with said license/registration/training? Wow. What's wrong with an AK?

or a street sweeper.

WTF is a street sweeper? You mean that truck with a big-ass vacuum on it?

However, I'm think Obama would like to go far beyond such "common-sense" niceties, since they are mostly already on the books. About the only thing I would be in favor of that isn't on the books is the private gun-sale/gun-show loopholes.

Such as?
 
You honestly think Palin wouldn't get any **** from 2nd amendment advocates if she pushed for the same so called common sense gun control that Obama wants to push?

And the first place the attacks on Palin would show up is via the NRA. They wouldn't stand for even the slightest bit of gun control advocacy from her, nor do they from any politician.
 
WTF is a street sweeper? You mean that truck with a big-ass vacuum on it?

Sibiu_street-sweeper.jpg
 
You honestly think Palin wouldn't get any **** from 2nd amendment advocates if she pushed for the same so called common sense gun control that Obama wants to push?


Yes, I believe that, to you, it doesn't even matter what Obama said. It's just that the person saying it has black skin and is a Dem.

If a conservative purposed the vary same thing, you'd pay it no mind.
 
Yes, I believe that, to you, it doesn't even matter what Obama said. It's just that the person saying it has black skin and is a Dem.

If a conservative purposed the vary same thing, you'd pay it no mind.

First of all, what does race have to do with this?

Secondly, you are more wrong than you realize obviously. Next time you have some NRA literature available to you, read it sometime. That will cure any doubts you have of pro-gun support of any politician advocating gun control.
 
You obviously don't realize how firmly people who are pro-gun believe in the 2nd Amendment then.

I'm very aware how little they understand about the 2nd Amendment and relevant SCOTUS decisions.
 
The part where public safety comes into play. That trumps your second amendment right any day of the week. Why do you think you don't own a tank or a small nuclear device?


Pistol: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
Rifle: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
Automatic rifle: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
Grenade launcher: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.
Patriot missile battery: In common use at the time? No. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.
Nuclear warheads: In common use at the time? No. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.

Tanks are not weapons. Tanks are vehicles weapons can be mounted in, but anyone with enough money to buy one can own one. That doesn't mean you can have a functioning cannon, 50cal machine gun, 2 saw machine guns (unless you buy a tax-stamp), or grenades (unless you have a demolitions license)...it means you can have the tank and the tank only.

You can own a black hawk helicopter, also...doesn't mean you can have the twin mini-guns.
 
Last edited:
I'm very aware how little they understand about the 2nd Amendment and relevant SCOTUS decisions.

Obviously you arent, because you believe that they would back Palin if she were advocating gun control.
 
Seriously? You really believe that? The support for Palin would plummet if she was stupid enough to make a comment like that.

You would have to explain the 2nd amendment to her before she could comment on it
 
You would have to explain the 2nd amendment to her before she could comment on it

I'll agree that she's out of her depth as far as politics are concerned, but she is far from stupid.
 
Back
Top Bottom