There are very few juries who would convict her and none that would sentence her to death. I think it's telling that you more vehemently condemn someone like Liblady who says she'd kill her daughter's attackers than you condemn the attackers themselves. You seem downright empathetic with molesters and rapists, not wanting them, in some cases to even be charged. Rather than make assumptions about why that could be, I'll ask, why?
Lets just say I sure am glad people more intelligent than yourself sit behind the bench in our state and federal courtrooms.
You seem downright empathetic with molesters and rapists, not wanting them, in some cases to even be charged.
And you totally ignored the reason I stated as to why. That teacher spent $500,000 dollars defending herself from FALSE CHARGES brought against her. She was found innocent, but the damage was already done. She will never teach again. Where is your sympathy for this woman? Where is the thread on this forum about a woman falsely accused whose life is now ruined? I thought that was what you conservawhackheads like, to help people. What, do I hear silence on this issue? So yes, absolutely, in the case where the evidence is lacking, charges SHOULD NOT EVEN BE FILED. You act like our justice system works on "charge the mother ****er and see if they can defend themselves." That's not how it works.
I'm going to turn this around on you. Why do YOU think charges should be brought against someone when there is no evidence? It seems that all a kid has to do is say "he touched me" and pretty much you don't give a **** about the accused and how they might not have done a damn thing, you want revenge. Revenge for a crime you "think" happened. To hell with proof, kill the son of a bitch. You're a right wing whackhead, yet another reason I left your party. They're nutty on the right, they don't use their brains, only their emotions. Don't believe me? Read the comments on the fox news article about that teacher being found innocent. The right wing whackheads STILL want her head on a platter, even after, as you say, "the system worked." Really? What system needs to be used where a right wing whackhead will actually BELIEVE someone found innocent DIDN'T DO IT? Hmm????????????????????????
Charges are brought based on evidence. Sexual charges are brought, evidence or not, and those charges are the most damning, damaging charges there are. Even found innocent, your name has been tarnished forever.
I think it's telling that you more vehemently condemn someone like Liblady who says she'd kill her daughter's attackers than you condemn the attackers themselves
I think its telling that you want to quickly ruin someones life based on no evidence. That's telling about you, and your right wing whackhead party. Personally, I condemn them both. A sexual attacker is just that. A murderer is a murderer. But only one should be put to death. This is not emotion speaking, THIS IS THE LAW. (You will NEVER know my PERSONAL beliefs on this because I actually am MATURE ENOUGH to separate emotion and the law.) Something you crazy conservative whackheads seem to have a hard time following when its an emotional issue. Whether you like it or not, the worst crime in the books is not sexual assault, but murder. (and I think in the military what is it, treason, or something, they can be hung for, but I mean the civilian world) They might NOT sentence her to death, but a good prosecutor would ask for it. You can't let emotion get in the way of justice, for ANYBODY. If she had just shot him for the **** of shooting him, shed get the death penalty. Just because she thought he was her daughters attacker, unless she catches him in the act, she would be a murderer and should be put to death, or at LEAST life without.
What seperates me from you? When you see someone charged with a sex crime, you AUTOMATICALLY think they are guilty. I do not. Considering how many people are falsely accused these days, I actually lean towards "they might NOT have done it" but always say "lets see what happens in court." I am not like the whackhead right, that wants to put the defendants head in a guillotine even BEFORE they make it to the courtroom.
Try to put a little more thought into your replies. I can back up everything I have stated here that isn't opinion based with links. You can do nothing but attack based on emotion. And YOU say its telling? Yes, it is, about you, not me.