• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Student accused of plotting to bomb Bush home

SE102 said:
I am not a 'liberal' frankly the political universe is much larger than you seem to comprehend. :coffeepap
'Liberal' is the new slur the right invokes to address those who are not of their political ilk



By which you essentially communicate nothing. Grats.
Click to expand...

"facist, racist, sexist, homophobe, bigot", is the lable that Leftists give to anyone that doesn't blindly follow their political agenda.
 
apdst said:
"facist, racist, sexist, homophobe, bigot", is the lable that Leftists give to anyone that doesn't blindly follow their political agenda.
Click to expand...
exaggerate much? that's a pretty broad brush you paint with.
 
SE102 said:
Where the flying **** did that come from? As in which oraface?

If you wanna know my designation its White Latino Anglican and American. In other wider designations I'd be a liberal peacenik of some-sort to you.
Click to expand...

I have my reasons for asking and I don't care what race, religion or ethnic origin you are. Please answer the question.

Are you a 9/11 truther or Jew hater?


SE102 said:
If re-reading the thread and the re-quotes I issued doesn't clue you in - I've pretty much lost my faith in the American soldier. You're blindness to it is basically a microcosm of the military's strategic dilemma. Look in the mirror, sort it out. I don't know what Jews have anything to do with this.
Click to expand...

I'm not a soldier and I did look back through the thread. WWII has nothing to do with the latest jihadi war we are fighting today and I still have no idea why you would even bring it up.

I disagree, hatred of the Jews has quite a bit to do with it.
 
Le Marteau said:
My God, Americans really are terrified of everyone whose name starts with al-.
Click to expand...

Ahhh.... no. Not even close.

We're fighting Islamic jihadis trying to kill us. We aren't terrified, we're determined. Well, most of us are.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Cease with the personal attacks. Stick to the topic or else you will be removed from the conversation at the very least.
 
SE102 said:
Well, white racists are politically castrated, of course. They likely know they cant get away with bombing or don't have the means at this point.
Click to expand...

Have you decided to take over the thread and make it about white racists?
 
SE102 said:
Which muslim army is attacking us again? With bombs and tanks and centers of productions oriented against our military power?
Or are you talking about mercilessly slaughtering civilians until they give in? Because I think if you did that you may face opposition from your own allies.

But I dont expect anything too much more than nihilism from the right most of the time.
Click to expand...

You know what I expect from the left? A Daniel Pearl like willingness to walk up to somebody that will behead them and just be so stupid that he would willingly become their captive and get beheaded.
I also expect the idiocy of aborting themselves into non existence.

You spoke of nihilism?
 
SE102 said:
I don't remember them asking you nicely to stay. Particularly France, Germany, Japan, and South Korea. It's a happenstance of the latest world war.
Click to expand...

When's the last time any of them asked us to leave?

SE102 said:
Don't act like mighty America heroically holds their weight. They have the means and some have drafted measures to replace American military might if the 'protectorate' were to be withdrawn.
Click to expand...

Oh My God, they drafted plans.......... That's like saying that the UN will impose sanctions. LMAO Keep setting em up for me.

SE102 said:
^ I noticed everyone neglected the above. Seems to be a habit. Does this mean you don't have the means to reply and concede? You were pretty adamant on the 'terrorist armies' before.
Click to expand...

The one employed by the Al Quaida and the Saudi Royal Family in underground warfare. The one being employed right now in the form of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Several have been defeated recently like the Tamil Tigers.

This is like shooting fish in a barrel.
 
theunbubba said:
When's the last time any of them asked us to leave?
Click to expand...

Well they certainy won't make legal or diplomatic motions to do so anytime soon. France and NATO havent always been the cheeriest. and as for Japan, and SK, well they have the occasional protest.

Oh My God, they drafted plans.......... That's like saying that the UN will impose sanctions. LMAO Keep setting em up for me.
Click to expand...

No, it's a set of procedures to acquire a nuclear arsenal and reinstate a military independent of ours... :coffeepap:

The one employed by the Al Quaida and the Saudi Royal Family in underground warfare. The one being employed right now in the form of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Several have been defeated recently like the Tamil Tigers.
Click to expand...

Armies tend to be connected to sovereign nations. They are not armies by anyones definition anywhere except possibly in your terms.

This is like shooting fish in a barrel.
Click to expand...

You're my entertainment before my midterm. Keep bringing it on, I might actually use something they taught me in school.
 
You sonny, are not worth the effort. if you are on public assistance free psychiatric help is available. Good luck.
 
theunbubba, here is a perfect example of why I referred him for medical help. People who respond with irrational comments and fail to recognize them as such have very real problems.:
SE102 said:
Armies tend to be connected to sovereign nations. They are not armies by anyones definition anywhere except possibly in your terms.
Click to expand...
How does one open saying that "Armies tend to...", which is a tentative qualifier of doubt comment and then close with "...be connected to sovereign nations." They can be, but only as one of many colloquially accepted dictionary meanings. Only someone who doubts himself/herself frames opinion in such a manner. And he uses this flawed opinion to disparage your referenced use of that same word, when you are correct.

I don't interchange with him anymore, but you might use the example of the Salvation Army, which is not an army of a "sovereign nation". An army is a group of people organized to a common purpose as an "army of terrorists", a phrase I've used myself and will stand by. It is also defined as "a large body of men organized for war" as members of an Islamic jihad . Or one might also observe an 'army of idiots'!

Reference:
The American College Dictionary (Library of Congress Catalog Card #68-21816)
 
doctorhugo said:
theunbubba, here is a perfect example of why I referred him for medical help. People who respond with irrational comments and fail to recognize them as such have very real problems.:

How does one open saying that "Armies tend to...", which is a tentative qualifier of doubt comment and then close with "...be connected to sovereign nations." They can be, but only as one of many colloquially accepted dictionary meanings. Only someone who doubts himself/herself frames opinion in such a manner. And he uses this flawed opinion to disparage your referenced use of that same word, when you are correct.

I don't interchange with him anymore, but you might use the example of the Salvation Army, which is not an army of a "sovereign nation". An army is a group of people organized to a common purpose as an "army of terrorists", a phrase I've used myself and will stand by. It is also defined as "a large body of men organized for war" as members of an Islamic jihad . Or one might also observe an 'army of idiots'!

Reference:
The American College Dictionary (Library of Congress Catalog Card #68-21816)
Click to expand...

Right you are. We fought one such army in southeast asia during the "Vietnam Conflict". I believe they called it the Viet Cong and geurilla warfare. Gee, some people don't learn what they were "taught in school" very well.
It's going to take one whale of a tutor for those midterms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom