"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
In Runyan, the court stated "When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justiciable."
According to the bill history linked in the OP, the bill was tabled for Feb22nd. However, I just heard on the radio that the bill was defeated today. No link yet.
The bill's chief sponsor told the Washington Post...
"This code only deals with illegal acts,"
"Abortion is legal in this country. This has nothing to do with abortion."
This mean killing a doctor who is legalize to do abortion is a crime.
But that doesn't matter cus I'm pretty sure
you extremist vigilante abortionist out there don't care for the law anyway.
I will DISAGREE with you not becuz I hate you but becus it's FUN.
If I'm wrong, let me know why?
I'm not afraid to admit my mistakes.
If the bill were intended to refer only to legal acts of self-defense against illegal acts of aggression, they should not have amended out the language that actually said that.