What "economic theory" -- link please?
Refer to the prior Empirical study pdf link from 2006.
From your own link (above); therefore, your link is irrelevant - as is most of your arugment thus far.Originally Posted by Boo Radley
Actually I said nothing of a larger force, actually the opposite. Youre claim is you want smaller and less effective, I want smaller and more effective. You should now admit your mistake and move on. I can pound on your own words all day long.Originally Posted by Boo Radley
What's hard to understand is your inconsistency. First you want less effective, then you claim you never said that. When I quote your own words, you backpeddle. When I point out now the third time, you want less effectiveness in the military and more effectiveness in healthcare and the obvious risk that poses to anyone who understands the World Wars of the 20th century. Perhaps that's my error in assuming your familiar with either of the World Wars.Originally Posted by Boo Radley
I'd like to see it as "realistic" given the lack of spirited or competent discussion from you.Originally Posted by Boo Radley
So no evidence then that you're paying more by choice?Originally Posted by Boo Radley