• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Miss. license plate proposed to honor KKK leader

Not in the sense that you're saying it did. That's like saying that FDR created death camps.

Ah I get it. He wasn't as bad as the other fascists you defend. He only killed Africans in concentration camps. Those don't count. Why am I not surprised you of all people would defend both Nathan Bedford and Moussolini? The evidence is getting thicker Tom.
 
From the Mississippi Encyclopedia:





You were saying?



Already addressed. Do you have anything other than trolling left?

no link? That's plagiarism, isn't it? Hmm?
 
Ah I get it. He wasn't as bad as the other fascists you defend. He only killed Africans in concentration camps. Those don't count. Why am I not surprised you of all people would defend both Nathan Bedford and Moussolini? The evidence is getting thicker Tom.

Except, he didn't build anymore concentration camps. No more than FDR did, anyway.

I'm deffending historical accuracy. I'm not one of those swells that insist's on believing a bull**** version of history, just because I hate the person that the facts pertain to.
 
so now not when he was 20, but for "some time 60 years ago"....

Does it make a difference? Did Nathan Bedford spend the same time working for civil rights? Maybe 5-10 years? 20? How long?

tell me had segragation not been outlawed, what side would he have been on?

didn't he personally filibuster it for 14 hours?

Alright, alright so just so we're clear. Let's say I concede that Byrd was still a racist even though quit the Klan and spent over half a century working towards civil rights. Can I also say that the Southern United states as a whole are still racist also due to their history? Think carefully about this question.
 
Except, he didn't build anymore concentration camps. No more than FDR did, anyway.

Your bull****ting is amazing. He did build concentration camps. In both Europe AND Africa.

I'm deffending historical accuracy.

You have to know what it is you're talking about first. You clearly don't.

I'm not one of those swells that insist's on believing a bull**** version of history, just because I hate the person that the facts pertain to.

On the contrary. You have defended Musolini and Forrest. Which makes your revisionism clear to everyone who has ever picked up a history book.
 
Does it make a difference? Did Nathan Bedford spend the same time working for civil rights? Maybe 5-10 years? 20? How long?


don't know, don't care. why did you not answer my question?









Alright, alright so just so we're clear. Let's say I concede that Byrd was still a racist even though quit the Klan and spent over half a century working towards civil rights. Can I also say that the Southern United states as a whole are still racist also due to their history? Think carefully about this question.



I think black folks in 1964 would disagree with you. your question is silly.
 
Does it make a difference? Did Nathan Bedford spend the same time working for civil rights? Maybe 5-10 years? 20? How long?



Alright, alright so just so we're clear. Let's say I concede that Byrd was still a racist even though quit the Klan and spent over half a century working towards civil rights. Can I also say that the Southern United states as a whole are still racist also due to their history? Think carefully about this question.

You're going to do that, anyway. :lamo
 
don't know, don't care. why did you not answer my question?

I think black folks in 1964 would disagree with you. your question is silly.

Your refusal to admit defeat is granted. The reverend's usual tactic. When cornered ignore actually debating.
 
Your bull****ting is amazing. He did build concentration camps. In both Europe AND Africa.

By that definition of a concentration camp, is it also true that FDR built concentration camps?



You have to know what it is you're talking about first. You clearly don't.

Obviously, I do.



On the contrary. You have defended Musolini and Forrest. Which makes your revisionism clear to everyone who has ever picked up a history book.

Erroneous! I've refuted the bull****, emotionally driven, politically correct, revised version of history.
 
The funniest part, is that Forrest had black soldiers serving in his brigade and Robert Byrd refused to serve along side a black man.

If folks stopped rading the PC version of history, I think the world would be much better off.

More revisionism. You mean he made 8 of his slaves serve?

Nathan Bedford Forrest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Forrest's command included his Escort Company (his "Special Forces"), for which he selected the best soldiers available. This unit, which varied in size from 40-90 men, was the elite of the cavalry. Eight of these soldiers were enslaved black men held by Forrest before the war.

Tom, you're looking mighty foolish.
 
Your refusal to admit defeat is granted. The reverend's usual tactic. When cornered ignore actually debating.



Are you having a tantrum? What do you want me to debate? seriously, this thread is fail.
 
By that definition of a concentration camp,

Do you know what a concentration camp is? You do know 30,000 Ethiopians died in those camps correct?

Obviously, I do.

You don't. It's proven time and time again.

Erroneous! I've refuted the bull****, emotionally driven, politically correct, revised version of history.

Delusions of grandeur are silly. Maybe you should stop? You've proven you're a revisionist. This is just one more piece in a pattern.
 
More revisionism. You mean he made 8 of his slaves serve?

Nathan Bedford Forrest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nim Wilkes, was a free black man that volunteered to serve in Forrest's cavalry.

Here's a report from the OR's--that's the Official Records of the War of the Rebellion, purdy much the bible of civil war history.

"The forces attacking my camp were the First Regiment Texas Rangers, a battalion of the First Georgia Rangers … and quite a number of Negroes attached to the Texas and Georgia troops, who were armed and equipped, and took part in the several engagements with my forces during the day" (Lieutenant Colonel Parkhurst's Report (Ninth Michigan Infantry) on General Forrest's attack at Murfreesboro, Tennessee, July 13, 1862, in Official Records, Series I, Vol XVI, Part I, page 805).

http://www.thesouthernamerican.org/files/didblksfight.html
 
It's good to see that Mississippi is still holding on to their title of "Most ignorant state in the U.S."
 
Do you know what a concentration camp is? You do know 30,000 Ethiopians died in those camps correct?



You don't. It's proven time and time again.



Delusions of grandeur are silly. Maybe you should stop? You've proven you're a revisionist. This is just one more piece in a pattern.

The source you posted recently didn't say that.
 
It's good to see that Mississippi is still holding on to their title of "Most ignorant state in the U.S."

At least they're not tyring to outlaw smoking in the city park, soda pops and salt.
 
Hatuey asked,



and you swooped in to blame the entire south for Mississippi making a stupid commorative license plate.

you take things far too seriously. i live in the south, people here can be quite backward.
 
Back
Top Bottom