• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Case?

Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Here are a couple reasons why maybeKagan should recuse herself.

Would Elena Kagan bow out of a health-care reform case? - CSMonitor.com
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, in this photo taken June 30. GOP senators are asking about Kagan's involvement, as solicitor general, in setting up strategy to defend the health care reform law from court challenges.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Should have been more explicit. (thought about it when i was typing)

Am asking how Mrs Thomas would benefit financially by her husband ruling one way or the other? Didn't see anything in her lobbying activities that related directly to the Health Care Bill.

Without knowing how Mrs. Thomas is rewarded for her work, there is no way to answer that question. Quite possibly not at all.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Should have been more explicit. (thought about it when i was typing)

Am asking how Mrs Thomas would benefit financially by her husband ruling one way or the other? Didn't see anything in her lobbying activities that related directly to the Health Care Bill.




.

Still waiting? I can't find anything either.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Barb, Kagan will almost certainly recuse herself. She has proven to be quite willing to do so. Nice try though. Why is it different for republicans to call for Kagan to recuse herself than for democrats to call for Thomas to do so? Why is one motive pure and the other tainted?
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Barb, Kagan will almost certainly recuse herself. She has proven to be quite willing to do so. Nice try though. Why is it different for republicans to call for Kagan to recuse herself than for democrats to call for Thomas to do so? Why is one motive pure and the other tainted?

I can't find where Ginni would benefit by any ruling. Do the Dems just want someone who rules by the constitution to recuse himself because Kagan probably will?
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Barb, Kagan will almost certainly recuse herself. She has proven to be quite willing to do so. Nice try though. Why is it different for republicans to call for Kagan to recuse herself than for democrats to call for Thomas to do so? Why is one motive pure and the other tainted?

(Ain't nothing pure in politics....)
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

I can't find where Ginni would benefit by any ruling. Do the Dems just want someone who rules by the constitution to recuse himself because Kagan probably will?

No, they want him to recuse himself because there is an appearance of a conflict of interest. Lobbyists are payed to get results. If the health care bill is overturned, that would be a mighty big result. Whether there is a real conflict neither you or I know, but there is certainly an appearance of one.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

(Ain't nothing pure in politics....)

See, I reject that cynicism. Note my sig quote from a republican on the topic.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

No, they want him to recuse himself because there is an appearance of a conflict of interest. Lobbyists are payed to get results. If the health care bill is overturned, that would be a mighty big result. Whether there is a real conflict neither you or I know, but there is certainly an appearance of one.


Ahhhh....I think I'm beginning to connect the dots.
Common Cause had a protest at a Koch bro. get together. During that protest they called for the hanging of Ginni and Clarence. One protester said he should be put back out in the fields. Another said he should have his toes cut off and fed to him one by one. NAACP and liberal media said it wasn't a national group like the tea party so not really newsworthy.
Here's Common Cause trying to call the shots about Thomas recusing himself. I guess they are newsworthy in certain liberal causes.


44 - House Democrats say Justice Thomas should recuse himself in health-care case
This is not the first case where your impartiality was in question. As Common Cause points out, you "participated in secretive political strategy sessions, perhaps while the case was pending, with corporate leaders whose political aims were advanced by the [5-4] decision" on the Citizens United case. Your spouse also received an undisclosed salary paid for by undisclosed donors as CEO of Liberty Central, a 501(c)(4) organization that stood to benefit from the decision and played an active role in the 2010 elections.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

No, they want him to recuse himself because there is an appearance of a conflict of interest. Lobbyists are payed to get results. If the health care bill is overturned, that would be a mighty big result. Whether there is a real conflict neither you or I know, but there is certainly an appearance of one.

But that's the question. Is there an actual conflict of interest OR are the Dems just claiming there's one. We know Kagan has a conflict because she argued for health care reform while working in the Obama admin.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Ahhhh....I think I'm beginning to connect the dots.
Common Cause had a protest at a Koch bro. get together. During that protest they called for the hanging of Ginni and Clarence. One protester said he should be put back out in the fields. Another said he should have his toes cut off and fed to him one by one. NAACP and liberal media said it wasn't a national group like the tea party so not really newsworthy.
Here's Common Cause trying to call the shots about Thomas recusing himself. I guess they are newsworthy in certain liberal causes.


44 - House Democrats say Justice Thomas should recuse himself in health-care case

Barb, what the hell does any of that have to do with anything?
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Barb, what the hell does any of that have to do with anything?

It looks to me like the far left is trying to coerce Thomas into recusing himself.
Common Cause happens to be a very racist group that Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, ignored probably because they all want
Obamacare to become a reality. Thomas is an obstacle.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

It looks to me like the far left is trying to coerce Thomas into recusing himself.
Common Cause happens to be a very racist group that Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, ignored probably because they all want
Obamacare to become a reality. Thomas is an obstacle.

No more than the right is trying to coerce Kagan to recuse herself.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Kagan's involvement. Asked and answered.


July 15, 2010
During the confirmation hearings, Sen. Tom Coburn (R) of Oklahoma asked Kagan if there was any time as solicitor general that she’d been asked to express an opinion on the legal merits of the health-care bill.

“There was not,” she responded.

Would Elena Kagan bow out of a health-care reform case? - CSMonitor.com


July 19 2010
While Kagan says she'll consider recusal matters on a case-by-case basis, she says her limited role in the state of Florida's lawsuit against the health care legislation--attendance at one meeting where the case was "briefly mentioned"--doesn't rise to the level of involvement Kagan says is needed for recusal.


Kagan Says She’ll Hear Health Care Lawsuit « Liveshots



July 19, 2010
She told Republicans in written responses to 13 questions that she had no involvement in developing the government‘s response to the lawsuit and never was asked her views or offered them.

Kagan would weigh health-law recusal case by case - Washington Times


July 24, 2010
Seven Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee pressed Ms. Kagan to promise that she would recuse herself from any challenges to the new health care law. Ms. Kagan would not bite, responding on Monday that she had nothing to do with the legislation, or a lawsuit challenging it. Nor, she said, had she ever expressed an opinion about either one.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/weekinreview/25liptak.html

Is Hatch getting a little worried?
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Oh gawd, lets see, some are making the case that there is an “appearance” of conflict of interest. And of course it has nothing to do with politics and we should believe that all 74 of those Democrats and only Democrats, as the only ones that see this.

So let me get this perfectly straight, we have a law that was passed by Democrats, and Democrats only, not “ONE” Republican vote. A lower court has ruled that the bill is unconstitutional, and now the bill will be headed for the US Supreme Court. The court right now is seated with 5 conservative judges, and 4 liberal judges. Basically not looking to swell for the liberal team.
Now 74 dems, (no rep's) and I'm just taking a guess here, but they all more then likely voted for this bill, are asking for a conservative judge to recuse himself.

And we actually have some in here saying that ….. naa does sound political to me at all . ….

Maybe we should have 74 Republicans sign a letter asking the President to step down, because he is inept, incompetent, and incapable of leading this country...... but understand, it's not political, it just that is the appearance he gives.
 
Last edited:
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Oh gawd, lets see, some are making the case that there is an “appearance” of conflict of interest. And of course it has nothing to do with politics and we should believe that all 74 of those Democrats and only Democrats, as the only ones that see this.

So let me get this perfectly straight, we have a bill that was passed by Democrats, and Democrats only, not “ONE” Republican vote. A lower court has ruled that the bill is unconstitutional, and now the bill will be headed for the US Supreme Court. The court right now is seated with 5 conservative judges, and 4 liberal judges. Basically not looking to swell for the liberal team.
Now 74 dems, (no rep's) and I'm just taking a guess here, but they all more then likely voted for this bill, are asking for a conservative judge to recuse himself.

And we actually have some in here saying that ….. naa does sound political to me at all . ….

Maybe we should have 74 Republicans sign a letter asking the President to step down, because he is inept, incompetent, and incapable of leading this country...... but understand, it's not political, it just that is the appearance he gives.

Not trying to be picky, but it's a law not a bill.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

I've talked to conservative lawyers who say Thomas is an imbecile who shouldn't be deciding any cases.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

I find it funny how this thread is mostly about Justice Thomas. I guess people don't care that Justice Kagan, who would probably vote in favor of the bill, is recused or not. Nope, it is all about those big bad Democrats trying to undermine the system by getting a conservative judge off.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

I've talked to conservative lawyers who say Thomas is an imbecile who shouldn't be deciding any cases.

I've talked to conservative lawyers who say Obama is an imbecile who shouldn't be
signing anything into law.................your point?
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

What are you talking about?



Wiener and 74 democrats want to stack the SCOTUS deck by asking thomas to recuse himself. I think they are wrong for doing so. What's your problem?

You suggested there is something illegal (letter of the law) by them asking a judge to consider recusing himself.

They're calling him out, BFG. Thomas' wife has opened her mouth and gotten herself in the public eye in a manner that raises questions.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

I've talked to conservative lawyers who say Thomas is an imbecile who shouldn't be deciding any cases.

sure you have. My former roommate from college has argued several cases before the USSC and he says otherwise. He also was the acting US AG. I suspect you are lying.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Clarence Thomas is an extremely intelligent man. You can disagree with his decisions, but calling him stupid, or an imbecile is merely partisan hackery.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Clarence Thomas is an extremely intelligent man. You can disagree with his decisions, but calling him stupid, or an imbecile is merely partisan hackery.

CT graduated in the top half of his class at yale law school. while one can make a good argument that CT-who also was an honors graduate of the College of the Holy Cross-would not have been accepted into Yale Law unless there was affirmative action, the same is true of Barack and Michelle Obama at Harvard, and Hillary Clinton at Yale. but to claim the man is an imbecile is the sign of a true moron
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

Clarence Thomas is an extremely intelligent man. You can disagree with his decisions, but calling him stupid, or an imbecile is merely partisan hackery.

I hate to agree with MrV, but in this case he is correct. Thomas is anything but stupid.
 
Re: Should Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Sit Out Health Care Ca

I think you misunderstood(or I expressed poorly) what I was saying. I agreed with your comments.

Yes, I'm so sorry. When someone commented that I'd misunderstood, I scrolled up, re-read and went "Ooops!" Unfortunately, I made the comment last night and just logged in a few minutes ago.

My sarcasm detector is in the shop for repairs. I'm seriously helpless without it. :mrgreen:
 
Back
Top Bottom