• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House to Push Gun Control

1Perry said:
It was there. It's why the SCOTUS made a ruling.
Click to expand...
I don't know what you're talking about, what was there and what ruling are you referring to.
 
CarlF said:
It pisses me off how people look at one single event and base decisions on broad subjects on them. 11,000 or so people die a


year from gun violence in the US and yet no one really gives a **** until some high-profile individual gets shot.
Click to expand...


Most shootings are criminal on criminal. Quite frankly the Good Reverend cares little what the barbarians do to one another.
 
ptif219 said:
Blacked out pages from Holder. Holder is not giving up any information. You still will not accept that.

Issa: DoJ should be
Click to expand...

As we don't know what is blacked out or why, we can't leap to many conclusions. You do so because ti suits you to, but your assumptions are not equal to evidence. :coffeepap
 
Boo Radley said:
we don't know what is blacked out or why
Click to expand...

LOL!

shills are useful idiots

hey, at least holder didn't have those OPERATIONAL DETAILS

about the sale of tens of thousands of GUNS

to MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS

which the dea AND the fbi AND the atf all FAILED to keep track of

at least our addled ag has THAT point in his favor

LOL!

reasoning, anyone?
 
I find any attack on our Constitution as anti-American and Obama, is at the top of my list of all time Anti-Americans.

He lied about death panels in his "Obama doesn't care about you grany plan,





"You're absolutely right that John McCain has not ah talked about my Muslim faith."
Classic Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is defined as; A verbal mistake that is thought to reveal an unconscious belief, thought, or emotion. In other words the truth.

There a hundreds of examples of Obama saying one thing and doing another now he wants to chip away at the Second Amendment after he and his blond followers armed thousands of drug dealers in Mexico and Honduras.

I think he has done a lot more to impeached for that Clinton by 100%.
 
CarlF said:
It pisses me off how people look at one single event and base decisions on broad subjects on them. 11,000 or so people die a year from gun violence in the US and yet no one really gives a **** until some high-profile individual gets shot.
Click to expand...

I know people that have hanged themselves. Should we outlaw rope?

Thousands die every year from car accidents, should we get rid of all cars?
 
Boo Radley said:
As we don't know what is blacked out or why, we can't leap to many conclusions. You do so because ti suits you to, but your assumptions are not equal to evidence. :coffeepap
Click to expand...

That is evidence of a cover up by Obama and Holder.
 
Thunder said:
yeah....please submit your evidence of this criminal conspiracy to the Impeachment Commission.
Click to expand...

It may be coming. You continue to deny the coverup yet you have been shown evidence. You show you worship at the feet of your Messiah Obama
 
ptif219 said:
It may be coming. You continue to deny the coverup yet you have been shown evidence. You show you worship at the feet of your Messiah Obama
Click to expand...

the Messiah not only has not come, but he ain't ever coming.


.......your silly strawman is just silly.
 
Thunder said:
the Messiah not only has not come, but he ain't ever coming.


.......your silly strawman is just silly.
Click to expand...

What is silly is your worshipping Obama and defending his destruction of this country
 
ptif219 said:
That is evidence of a cover up by Obama and Holder.
Click to expand...

No it isn't. It's a claim of a cover up. A claim does not equal evidence. To know whether the black out parts are a cover up or not, we'd have to know what was blacked out and why. At this point, you are only speculating.
 
Last edited:
The Prof said:
LOL!

you don't know what you're talking about

sworn testimony under oath is evidence, evan

you're WRONG again
Click to expand...

So, any thing said in testimony is the absolute truth, like Clinton didn't have sexual relations? Good to know that is your standadrd.
 
Boo Radley said:
No it isn't. It's a claim of a cover up. A claim does not equal evidence. To know whether the black out parts are a cover up or not, we'd have to know what was blacked out and why. At this point, you are only speculating.
Click to expand...

If they are blacking out the information that is a cover up. They are hiding what happened.
 
ptif219 said:
If they are blacking out the information that is a cover up. They are hiding what happened.
Click to expand...

No, there are other reasons to black out information. Seriously, you need to take a deep breath and think for a minute. :coffeepap
 
Boo Radley said:
So, any thing said in testimony is the absolute truth, like Clinton didn't have sexual relations? Good to know that is your standadrd.
Click to expand...

Clinton was proven a liar and lost his law license because of it. If Melson is making false testimony the DOJ will charge him
 
ptif219 said:
Clinton was proven a liar and lost his law license because of it. If Melson is making false testimony the DOJ will charge him
Click to expand...

Maybe they will charge him, but you see the point, right, that testimony in and of it self doesn't equal proof. You need more.
 
Boo Radley said:
So, any thing said in testimony is the absolute truth
Click to expand...

LOL!

of course not, sally

sworn testimony by the sitting atf appointed by obama swearing that doj tried to limit his communication with congress is exactly what it is

and nothing more

it's sworn testimony by the sitting atf appointed by obama that doj tried to limit his communication with congress

communication, that is, about the SALE

of TENS OF THOUSANDS

of assault WEAPONS

to MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS

by THREE separate agencies of the doj

with no TRACKING

such that the GUNS showed up at the MURDER SCENES of our AGENTS

as far south as MEXICO CITY

and the addled ag's BEST explanation is---he DELEGATED all those pesky OPERATIONAL DETAILS

grow up, show a little self respect
 
Last edited:
Boo Radley said:
Maybe they will charge him, but you see the point, right, that testimony in and of it self doesn't equal proof. You need more.
Click to expand...

The testimony,The blacked out documents. The proof is there you will not accept the Obama administration is blocking this investigation
 
ptif219 said:
The testimony,The blacked out documents. The proof is there you will not accept the Obama administration is blocking this investigation
Click to expand...

You're not listening. Read slower. Testimony is only a claim without actual evidence to support that claim. We have to have more information on the blacked out parts. Without knowing why, we cannot leap to blocking the investigation. Right now all you have is suppostion what you accept because your want to believe it. Nothing more.
 
Boo Radley said:
Testimony is only a claim without actual evidence to support that claim.
Click to expand...

LOL!

WRONG again

testimony is offered by a WITNESS who saw or heard events TESTIFIED to

it's amazing how basic the things you don't know

think much?
 
Boo Radley said:
You're not listening. Read slower. Testimony is only a claim without actual evidence to support that claim. We have to have more information on the blacked out parts. Without knowing why, we cannot leap to blocking the investigation. Right now all you have is suppostion what you accept because your want to believe it. Nothing more.
Click to expand...


Sworn testimony is truth if they are found to lie they go to jail. So you have no problem with Holder hiding information and blocking the investigation. You been shown facts and you still try to defend the indefensible.
 
ptif219 said:
Sworn testimony is truth if they are found to lie they go to jail. So you have no problem with Holder hiding information and blocking the investigation. You been shown facts and you still try to defend the indefensible.
Click to expand...

Only if someone presses charges. Saying I think they are supressing information isn't evidence. It's his opinion. You have trouble with the difference between fact and opinion. But I understand, you really, really want to believe this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom