That was your origial quote on the subject. 'Blood libel' had nothing to do with the Inquisition.When Sarah Palin goes on record to apologize for having compared her 'persecution' to that of Jews burned at the stake during the Catholic inquisition, maybe ludahai will buy himself a shovel and dig himself the dignity necessary to come up with an honest thread.
I swear, dealing with people like yourself who have no sense of authority and history...This is exatcly where I wanted to catch you. Revising history to fit your point again. Regardless of whether or not the pope said blood libel was false, Catholic priests continued to make cases of blood libel during the Inquisition.
Priests do NOT make Catholic Church policy; the Pope and Cardinals do.
Why would I do that when you are doing such a good job of making an utter fool of yourself.You're welcome to turn the **** around and leave your own thread now.
You mean THESE two (which I quoted earlier in this thread, and you once again ignored)I already destroyed this link when you posted it the first time. EVERY example given is related to Judaism.
Didn't know the Chinese were Jews... nor did I know neopagans and Satanists were... gee... gotta check up on my liberal classification of religions...Originally Posted by linked source posted earlier
I am defending the TRUTH, something your ilk have a hard time understanding.As I said before. You don't have the minerals necessary to actually do more than complain about being called out for being a defender of Catholic revisionism.