• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Health Care Reform Repeal Passes House

having actually lectured on the subject-your citation demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of the subject

And having actually lectured on economics, your "ZOMG TEH EVIL SOCIALISTS ARE STEALING MY MONEYS!!!!" attitude and your "ZOMG TEH HEALTH CARE WILL DESTROY AMERICA!!!" attitude demonstrate a profound lack of understanding of how economies actually work.

And if you're actually a constitutional scholar, then you should know full well that your silly opinion of how to interpret the Constitution is just one of many, not the immutable truth for how people should interpret the Constitution for all time.
 
Last edited:
yeah, and someone can interpret the second amendment to give the government power to regulate small arms

Sure they can. And though I'd disagree with it, it could certainly be seen that way.

doesn't mean its right. and no that was not the intent of that part of the USSC or even contemplated by those who wrote it

That's fine, but this comes to a fundamental difference in how you and I view the Constitution. From my observations, you are a pretty strict constructionist. I am a Developmentalist from the Brandais/Cardozzo school. We are NEVER going to agree with how to interpret the Constitution.
 
Yawn-as if people like you and haymarket were not whining about the rich before I started taking issue with the parasitic mentality

I have never whined about the rich. The only time I ever even criticize "the rich" is in response to your disgusting class warfare rhetoric. I know that most rich people are nothing like you, fortunately.
 
Did I say government solution? If you have free market solution, please explain. Or maybe you just think people with prexisting conditions should just fend for themselves?

life and society isnt perfect. I work hard, and have a good job that has good insurance. I don't have a duty to create a perfect solution for others nor do I pretend I can. I do know what is wrong and obamacare is wrong
 
getting a bit testy there.

edify me as to your education concerning constitutional scholarship

having actually lectured on the subject-your citation demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of the subject

Nice dodge. Instead of responding you ask for credentials on an internet forum. If credentials is what you like-where did you lecture?
 
I have never whined about the rich. The only time I ever even criticize "the rich" is in response to your disgusting class warfare rhetoric. I know that most rich people are nothing like you, fortunately.

that oozes BS. its the left who wage class warfare. Obama was whining about the rich not "paying their fair share" that is proof enough
 
And your attitude is exactly what drives people toward those "wealth redistributionist" or "class warfare" policies you deride. Your incessant whining about how horrible the poor rich folk have it in this country doesn't exactly engender any sympathy for you or your cause.
So his attitude justifies a lack of ethics? That in itself is unethical, sorry to tell you.

You have to embrace his freedom of speech, and be willing to defend it, ESPECIALLY when you disagree with it. Either that or get ticked off and rationalize taking what's his....
 
Nice dodge. Instead of responding you ask for credentials on an internet forum. If credentials is what you like-where did you lecture?

UofCincinnati, U of Northern Kentucy U of Dayton, Cornell, among others
 
Moderator's Warning:
Alright... there will be no more asking for credentials or claiming superiority because of credentials. Except of course, my credentials as a mod allow me to enforce this.
 
So his attitude justifies a lack of ethics? That in itself is unethical, sorry to tell you.

You have to embrace his freedom of speech, and be willing to defend it, ESPECIALLY when you disagree with it. Either that or get ticked off and rationalize taking what's his....

people who want to take other peoples' property call those of us who tire of being looted "selfish"

Those of us who are willing to pay for ourselves are attacked by those who demand we pay for them
 
I see, so you're not a thinking man. You just react and follow. Interesting.

another silly insult from a newbie

Nothing you have posted demonstrates any level of thinking that impresses me. another leftwinger pretending to be independent.

when people like you demand others pay for your programs those people have a right to object.

I have no duty to take care of you or to propose something that will help your problems

I take care of myself-wtf do you get off calling me a non thinker when you apparently need others to support you?
 
No, it is true. It was true in Novemeber. On this issue, many who disliked the reform disliked it because it didn't go far enough and not that it did too much.

That's why so many who ran on the promise to repeal the bill, won.
 
Those of us who are willing to pay for ourselves are attacked by those who demand we pay for them

You have an extremely false interpretation that all Republicans are rich and Democrats and Centrist are poor.

Picture1.png


This list shows the richest cities in America and they are all incredibly liberal cities. My family has more money than most, and while I myself don't believe in the concept of a wellfare state or universal health care, I do believe in a portion of my tax dollars going to some social services, like healthcare, to make the country a better place to live. This whole concept of the poor are taking money from the rich is false. Some of us with money believe in a certain amount of social services.
 
You have an extremely false interpretation that all Republicans are rich and Democrats and Centrist are poor.

Picture1.png


This list shows the richest cities in America and they are all incredibly liberal cities. My family has more money than most, and while I myself don't believe in the concept of a wellfare state or universal health care, I do believe in a portion of my tax dollars going to some social services, like healthcare, to make the country a better place to live. This whole concept of the poor are taking money from the rich is false. Some of us with money believe in a certain amount of social services.

as you gain experience on this board you will learn that silly straw man arguments don't win you much here.

Later
 
another silly insult from a newbie

Nothing you have posted demonstrates any level of thinking that impresses me. another leftwinger pretending to be independent.

when people like you demand others pay for your programs those people have a right to object.

I have no duty to take care of you or to propose something that will help your problems

I take care of myself-wtf do you get off calling me a non thinker when you apparently need others to support you?

Whoa there guy, don't have a melt down. You don't know anything about me, my occupation, how much taxes I pay, and how much I pay for my families health insurance every month. Stick to the debate topic.

melting.jpg


BTW, I call myself an independent because I have voted for both Democrats and Republicans in my lifetime. I vote for the man, not the party. I don't think most on here could say the same.
 
as you gain experience on this board you will learn that silly straw man arguments don't win you much here.

Later

I can see you feel pretty special about being a member of an internet forum for longer than me. I've been debating on political forums for years chief, I just recently came to this one, and if you're the best they have to offer, I'm not impressed.
 
I see, so you're not a thinking man. You just react and follow. Interesting.
I am genuinely curious what reasoned steps brought you to that conclusion from what TD wrote...that it's not his duty to provide others with a perfect solution, nor does he pretend he can.
I mean, aside form the fact that it's ad hom, a tool typically associated with a "thinking man's tools for debate".

This whole concept of the poor are taking money from the rich is false. Some of us with money believe in a certain amount of social services.

Well, since you brought it up, let's examine your signature and your claims, for consistency...

Give a poor man a fish and you've created a Democrat
Teach a poor man to fish and you've created a Centrist


Please tell me JohnnyC, if the following largest budget items (what..60% of our tax revenue?) in the U.S. federal budget are most similar to teaching fishing, or handing out fish.

1. Social security
2. Defense
3. Medicaire
4. Medicaid
 
Last edited:
Why should I have to pay for your police protection?

Why should I have to pay for your fire protection?

Why should I have to pay for your roads?

Why should I have to pay for your libraries?

Why should I have to pay for your parks?

Those things should all be done by the states.
 
So, the teabag reps wasted a day and a half appeasing their base.

Well done, go GOP!!

Now go do your jobs and make laws that matter.
 
Those things should all be done by the states.

What about those roads that go over the line?

What about those criminals that cross those lines?

What about those parks that are National?

What about those fires in those parks?

None of you far-righties want to pay for all the stuff you want and use every single day. Freeloaders.
 
I still have to pay for them. Why should I have to pay for YOUR police, fire, roads, libraries...etc. I shouldn't have to pay for you to have any of those things, whether it is State or Federal. It doesn't matter...either way I'm paying for your protection.
 
That's accurate. I haven't watched C-Span in ages. WAY too slow for me. Doesn't NV mean "no vote"?

i understand, thanks

yeah, nv, but the snapshot said there were 3:00 left

no problem, stay up
 
On this board, most of the conservative vision of liberalism comes across as cartoonish.

i hear you, tho i hope it's not most

there's a far more effective way to get across, in my opinion

it involves linking a lot
 
i understand, thanks

yeah, nv, but the snapshot said there were 3:00 left

no problem, stay up

Oh... I didn't notice the 3:00 left. I thought Grim posted the final vote.
 
Back
Top Bottom