• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Biparti

Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip

Le Marteau.

We're you aware that the UK is the 2nd most crime ridden EU country? That the crime rate in your gun free haven is 5 times that of the USA? Don't believe me?

article-1196941-05900DF7000005DC-677_468x636.jpg


Britain's violent crime record is worse than any other country in the European union, it is revealed today.

Official crime figures show the UK also has a worse rate for all types of violence than the U.S. and even South Africa - widely considered one of the world's most dangerous countries
The most violent country in Europe: Britain is also worse than South Africa and U.S. | Mail Online
he figures, compiled from reports released by the European Commission and United Nations, also show:

* The UK has the second highest overall crime rate in the EU.
* It has a higher homicide rate than most of our western European neighbours, including France, Germany, Italy and Spain.
* The UK has the fifth highest robbery rate in the EU.
* It has the fourth highest burglary rate and the highest absolute number of burglaries in the EU, with double the number of offences than recorded in Germany and France.
*SSA
 
Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip

Yes it is. It's the government's business to keep its citizens safe, and with religious fanatics all over middle America walking around with pistols and shotguns on their person, the populace isn't very safe now is it?

It is not the governments damn business what firearms someone has. If the government was so concerned with keeping its citizens safe it would crank up the security on the border and it would actually send the military to the border to actually defend the border. Considering the fact there is a little over 12,000 homicides a year with firearms compared to the 250-300 million firearms in this country we are pretty much safe.


So, the government has several clear-cut and rightful reasons to limit and restrict the sale of weapons.

Its the government's duty to support and defend the constitution(which has been point out by other posters in this thread) not find ways to subvert it.
 
Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip

Yes it is. It's the government's business to keep its citizens safe, and with religious fanatics all over middle America walking around with pistols and shotguns on their person, the populace isn't very safe now is it?

So, the government has several clear-cut and rightful reasons to limit and restrict the sale of weapons.



One would argue the "populace" in middle America is far safer than the "populace" in our major coastal cities... You know the ones with big gun bans?



:failpail:
 
Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip


Dude, there has to be something wrong with this chart. There is no way in hell South Africa has less violent crime then the UK, it's simply impossible.
 
Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip

A requirement to report sales does not in any way violate the second amendment right to keep and bear arms. There is no infringement of the second amendment here, sorry.

Are you serious?? If the government knows how many guns you have they know when they have taken all that you have.

What about the right to privacy? If you get one of many STDs you are reports but there is no reporting of HIV out of the person’s right to privacy. I had to be tested for HIV because those who know that they have HIV don’t have to tell and if there is a chance that surgical instrument was not properly sterilized then a lot of people have to be tested because the hospital doesn’t know if one of the people had HIV.

HIV is more deadly percentage wise than guns so let’s let gun owners have their privacy.
with religious fanatics all over middle America walking around with pistols and shotguns on their person, the populace isn't very safe now is it?

If you are saying that all of the drug dealers that are being killed in Chicago are being killed by these religious fanatics then I have to say – “Keep up the good work.”.
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip

Dude, there has to be something wrong with this chart. There is no way in hell South Africa has less violent crime then the UK, it's simply impossible.

Go to teh source, check their numbers.
 
Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip

the proposal clearly runs afoul of the second point-AKA the Tenth amendment

You'll have to forgive me, as I don't seem to be on your level when it comes to understanding the law... Please explain how a violation of the Tenth Amendment is a violation of the Second Amendment.
 
Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip

Dude, there has to be something wrong with this chart. There is no way in hell South Africa has less violent crime then the UK, it's simply impossible.

Why not? Too many colored folks in Sout' Af-ree-ka?
 
Back
Top Bottom