Re: Shooting Victim Threatens Tea Partier
Well, as I said, there was no legitimate link between Loughner and the TEA party in the first place, yet this guy seems to believe there was. who has been telling us that it was the TEA Party?
No one told Sarah Palin that a killing was going to happen ahead of time, how did she randomly know to put crosshairs on this congresswoman?
Seriously...could it possibly be that this guy...like many in the media, in politics, and on this forum...on his own volition came to that asinine idea on his own? Are you saying that's impossible?
And if its not impossible, then what proof do you have that his opinion came due to the "rhetoric" from people on the left in the aftermath of this and not due to his own thoughts and opinions?
I'll go you one better and say that, even if it's indisputably proven that this guy believed and worshipped every left wing pundit, I'd say the responsibility for this guy's actions still rest with him. I said that about Loughner too, so I'm being consistent. I'll be interested to see if those on the left will be as well.
Really? You've been consistent?
I must've missed your condemnation of individuals baselessly using this for political gain such as the following post which, when people made similar regarding the tea party you were all over them pointing out their ridiculousness:
The liberals and their lies are coming home to roost...
Great job people... Pat yourselves on the back and we'll all wait for the next time you incite violence with you lies and malicious rhetoric.
And really, you are CONSISTENT with comments like this?
No, the irony is in that certain left wing pundits seem to now have created the very atmosphere they wrongly bashed the TEA party for.
I thought in the all the threads that were blaming the tea party you were saying how there's no proof that the tea party in any way influenced this man through their "atmosphere". Yet somehow you're amking a claim that the "left wing pundits" DID create the "Very atmosphere" that you were saying they were wrong about with regards to the Tea Party.
It seems you're not even consistent in this thread, let alone with your stance over the past week.
For further evidence, how about this post
I think the same way too, however, there is one major difference. In Loughner's case, he was not motivated by right wing rhetoric where it looks like this guy actually did believe some of the left's rhetoric.
Sure seems like you're making a claim that this guy WAS motivated by "the left's rhetoric". So again, I ask you...where's your proof on this? Are are you just capitalizing on coincidences and assumptions with absolutely no proof in hopes of pushing a political agenda and taking advantage of death threats for your own partisan reasons?
Seriously, you're not consistent save for in your attempts to act like you are with hollow words here or there that are betrayed when someone looks at your other posts in the thread.