Page 34 of 42 FirstFirst ... 243233343536 ... LastLast
Results 331 to 340 of 420

Thread: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

  1. #331
    Student Iron River's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    09-16-17 @ 06:53 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    254

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Are you for higher taxes on the wealthy?
    No. Any money taken from the private sector is money taken out of the private sector.

    Is 250,000 a year wealthy?
    No. It was in the 50s but not today.

    Are you for the death penalty?
    In the spirit of fairness I would strap the accused to a table and ingest sodium-amatol into their veins and ask them if they committed the crime of which they are charged. They will tell the truth and if they confess we could give them a little bigger shot and kill them.

    Do you believe in spreading the wealth around?
    Yes I do and the best way to spread the wealth around is to let the people who created the wealth use it as the see fit.

    Are you for gay marriage?
    Sure, every man and woman should all have a gay, happy, productive, funny, etc. marriage.

    Do you believe Roe v Wade was a gross overreach by the SCOTUS?
    Yes, the SC had no authority to make all states accept laws that had been in NY and other states.

    Was Algore cheated in 2000?
    No; Algore is an idiot.

    Did Bush lie about getting us into Iraq?
    No; President Bush repeated what he was told by our people, the British intelligence people told him and most of the Congress agreed with him. The Congress was all of the information and thought that Iraq had a massive stock pile of WMDs and we knew that Ira was paying young menís families if the blew themselves up in Israel.

  2. #332
    Educator TBone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Phoenix
    Last Seen
    04-01-15 @ 08:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    673

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    It's a transparent and downright pathetic attempt for the Left and their journOlists to try and disengage the public from The Tea Party, Palin and Limbaugh. To try and stifle what is happening on The Hill.

    Like Foley during the 2006 mid-terms, and Obama in 2008, this is their latest rabbit from the hat moment, and a very disgusting one. Never waste a crisis... isn't that their motto?

    But... it is what it is.

    Problem for the Left is... I doubt even their entire 23% believes the toxic waste coming from the idiots that claim Palin, The Tea Party and Limbaugh are responsible. That claim is absolute, unadulterated idiocy.

    .
    Please, this is the POT calling the Kettle black. Limiting this type of stuff to the left and dems is foolish, there is monopoly on this behavior by the left. Hanity did the same by bring Sheriff Joe on his show. The pundits love it, it makes them more money because they are the mouth pieces of those that can't compose a thought on their own.
    It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
    Emiliano Zapata


  3. #333
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:29 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,335
    Blog Entries
    12

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Quote Originally Posted by Boo Radley View Post
    It doesn't really even do that.



    Higher than who? A progressive tax, yes. Just random gore the wealthy, no.



    Yes. Compared to 40,000 a year. Sure is.



    No. For two reasons: I don't think we be 100% certain that we're actually killing the right person, and I think death might be too easy for some.



    That's more a phrase taken out of context, so there is no way that should ever be a yes or know question. What is meant by the person who uttered such a phrase, and what is meant by the person asking the question? That requires a lot of understanding between the parties.



    Yes. And why matters. How it's painted matters. The question is only good in yes and no form for a vote on the issue. Without discussion, it's really meaningless.



    Much more complicated. And something I'm much less sure.



    No. But the resulting circus was a disgrace for both parties and the courts as a whole. We all lost something in that. Again, a yes or no is meaningless in this discourse, and would only matter if we were somehow voting to do something about it.



    See above.



    Of course he did, but it too is complicated, and unless we're voting on some action to take places, a yes and no alone is meaningless.



    Is that even what they did? Didn't congress as a whole really just pass the buck?



    And isn't this just a stupid question? And yes, there are stupid questions.



    No, you really couldn't. With no explanation, all you could really do is use those answers to paint any picture you want to paint. And believe me that has become the method of the day in this country. To paraphrase a fictional MLK from the Boondocks cartoon, too many today seek more to use an answer to inaccurately frame a debate or tar an opponent, and too few seek to listen to understand and consider.
    Boo, you didn't have to answer, it was only used as an illustration, but let me pick a couple of your responses.

    I will say you are right on about one thing; 2000 was a circus, and we have Algore to thank for that.

    The war votes and political expediency is not a dumb question in the least.
    The war votes by Dems were for poitical expediency. After 911, their stance... decades of hostility to national security was at the fore, and they knew it was going to cost them big time if they didn't do something. The Dems asked for a second vote in the senate to show their support and got it. Hillary told Code Pink about the special insight she has as co-president. They voted to send troops, and then turned on them... for political expediency... in an attempt to knock down Bush. It is one of the most disgusting series of events in our history, and the Dems own it. If you did not follow the party line, as ONE longtime lib failed to do... they pulled the long knives on that individual... Joe Lieberman.

    You see... a simple NO answer to the question would reveal either ignorance or blindness. Don't need rationalization... just Y/N answer.

    .
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  4. #334
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    so now, to get to the next link, we're all gonna have to scroll thru 20 pages of deep filosofee about whether yes or no questions are, umm, what, good or bad?

    LOL!

    only in the dpforums, folks

    have fun

  5. #335
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Quote Originally Posted by Boo Radley View Post
    The sherif (sic) is a leftie?
    yes

    Liberal Arizona sheriff Clarence Dupnik sees cause of violence - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com

    pardon the instrusion of substance, silly solons

    you may resume your mindless polemic

  6. #336
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 03:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    30,272

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Those "Fallacies" in my "assumptions" are allowable due to your hatred of nuance, thus allowing for such assumptions to be made if one is to assume you're consistant with your broad, black and white view points. Military is government....you don't support increasing government budgets...therefore you must not support increasing the military's budget. That's a completely logical and reasonable assumption to make in a black and white world without nuance if you are to believe you're a consistant person.

    "I think in general the government shouldn't increase budgets, but individual budgets could be increased through the decreasing of other agencies or programs budgets to create a net decrease while allowing those functions of the government that I feel are most vital and constitutional to function as is required."

    A great deal more nuance, but likely far better describes why you seem to think that me suggesting you are against increasing the military budget is an incorrect assumption but you yourself said you do not support increasing government budgets.

    I believe that nuance in the way that liberals use it are in form to distract, and cover their ignorant views. Oh, and your analogy still falls flat, because if you really paid any degree of attention, you'd see that I called for a 20% cut across the board. Including military.

    In case you haven't seen it, liberals have drove us broke.

    So my big problem is myself? Exactly how is that?

    You think that by attacking me that wins you favor with the liberals on the board, or that you think yourself some kind of objective when you disagree with other conservatives. At least I have the conviction of my beliefs. Now is that to say that my mind can't be changed? No. But, I am not going to give our lib counterparts any more ammo than necessary...Would that you could say the same.


    j-mac
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  7. #337
    Student Iron River's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    09-16-17 @ 06:53 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    254

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Please, this is the POT calling the Kettle black. Limiting this type of stuff to the left and dems is foolish, there is monopoly on this behavior by the left.
    Your example of Sheriff Joe tells us that you weren’t listening when Sheriff Joe refused to paint the left with the same accusations piled on him by the left. I saw Sheriff Joe saying that he didn’t believe that vitriol from any side or any body was the reason for the killing in Tucson

  8. #338
    Student Zyroh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    02-13-11 @ 02:04 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    237

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron River View Post
    No; President Bush repeated what he was told by our people, the British intelligence people told him and most of the Congress agreed with him. The Congress was all of the information and thought that Iraq had a massive stock pile of WMDs and we knew that Ira was paying young men’s families if the blew themselves up in Israel.
    trillions of dollars spent, thousands of US/coalition deaths, millions iraqis killed, no WMDs. no one went to jail for lying. wonder how many more of these we pull till people start to see that it's wrong. gear up for yemen!
    Democracy is two wolves and sheep voting on what's for dinner. Liberty is a well armed sheep willing to contest the vote.

  9. #339
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:31 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    89,616

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Sheriff Dupnik has committed a Class One Serious Violation of the True Believer Code of Conduct. For that there is only one punishment - the offender must be effectively neutralized so that they can no longer speak the truth to the American people. The truth about the True Believers and their missionary crusade to change America into a right wing paradise must always be protected and those who expose it must be dealt with with every available resource at hand.
    __________________________________________________ _
    There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers

  10. #340
    Student Zyroh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    02-13-11 @ 02:04 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    237

    Re: Arizona Sheriff Blasts Rush Limbaugh for Spewing 'Irresponsible' Vitriol

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    I
    In case you haven't seen it, liberals have drove us broke.
    30% say liberals made us broke, 30% say conservatives did it, 40% say both of them did it. problem is we still have 60% of people that are wrong, can't fix the problem till you guys can get on board and start fixing it.
    Democracy is two wolves and sheep voting on what's for dinner. Liberty is a well armed sheep willing to contest the vote.

Page 34 of 42 FirstFirst ... 243233343536 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •