• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge sentences Tom DeLay to 3 years in prison

pbrauer

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
25,394
Reaction score
7,208
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
This is very good news...

AUSTIN, Texas – A judge ordered former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay to serve three years in prison Monday for his role in a scheme to illegally funnel corporate money to Texas candidates in 2002.
The sentence comes after a jury in November convicted DeLay on charges of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

...

Judge sentences Tom DeLay to 3 years in prison - Yahoo! News
 
After Delay gets out of prison, he is also going to have to serve 10 years probation. The wheels of justice may turn slow in Texas, but they do turn. Delay has just gotten his just deserts. You can get away with a lot of crap in Texas, if you are connected, but laundering money isn't one of them.
 
At least justice was met in this case. Now we just need to put Randal in the slammer as well.
 
If you do the crime, you do the time.
 
After Delay gets out of prison, he is also going to have to serve 10 years probation. The wheels of justice may turn slow in Texas, but they do turn. Delay has just gotten his just deserts. You can get away with a lot of crap in Texas, if you are connected, but laundering money isn't one of them.

What's he gonna do with all that sand?

:D
 
I predict at least some of his sentence or convictions will be overturned on appeal
 
Let me see 'the hammer', boy.

prison-bitch.jpg
 
Very good news indeed! I remember getting an invitation as a small business owner from the office of Tom Delay to join a Business Advisory Group. It was noted that the "group" would not vote on anything, or even have to attend any meetings. There was however a $250 fee to join to be made payable to Tom Delay's office.
I wonder how many he suckered in with that one?
 
...while Rangle walks away a free man... oh wait he was "censured" :roll:
 
What was it exactly Rangel did vs. money laundering?
 
I'm glad he is being punished. Doesn't matter what political stripe a criminal is. Wrong is wrong and it's good to see this outcome.
 
I don't see it as very good news. I'm ashamed my native State allowed this to go on in the first place.

Actually, Texas did NOT allow this to go on in the first place. As you can plainly see, they prosecuted the crap out of Delay.
 
Actually, Texas did NOT allow this to go on in the first place. As you can plainly see, they prosecuted the crap out of Delay.


I gues I could have said that better
 
...while Rangle walks away a free man... oh wait he was "censured" :roll:

You are mixing apples and oranges here. Yea, I agree that Rangel is a slimeball, but he broke Congressional rules. Delay broke criminal laws of the State of Texas. There is a huge difference. Maybe Rangel should have gotten more than he did, but you will have to take that up with the House. Texas is a different entity entirely. Had Rangel done what he did in Texas, he would end up as Delay's cell mate. LOL. And had Delay confined his dishonesty to Washington, he probably would only have been censured.
 
Last edited:
You are mixing apples and oranges here. Yea, I agree that Rangel is a slimeball, but he broke Congressional rules. Delay broke criminal laws of the State of Texas. There is a huge difference. Maybe Rangel should have gotten more than he did, but you will have to take that up with the House. Texas is a different entity entirely. Had Rangel done what he did in Texas, he would end up as Delay's cell mate. LOL. And had Delay confined his dishonesty to Washington, he probably would only have been censured.


No argument, and I'm not saying DeLay didn't deserve it. I'm just POed at what some politicos get away with.
 
You are mixing apples and oranges here. Yea, I agree that Rangel is a slimeball, but he broke Congressional rules. Delay broke criminal laws of the State of Texas. There is a huge difference. Maybe Rangel should have gotten more than he did, but you will have to take that up with the House. Texas is a different entity entirely. Had Rangel done what he did in Texas, he would end up as Delay's cell mate. LOL. And had Delay confined his dishonesty to Washington, he probably would only have been censured.

Tax evasion is also criminal.
 
What was it exactly Rangel did vs. money laundering?

Money laundering...uh financial misconduct....including tax evasion, soliciting donations for a monument and using a residence for business.
 
Last edited:
You are mixing apples and oranges here. Yea, I agree that Rangel is a slimeball, but he broke Congressional rules. Delay broke criminal laws of the State of Texas. There is a huge difference. Maybe Rangel should have gotten more than he did, but you will have to take that up with the House. Texas is a different entity entirely. Had Rangel done what he did in Texas, he would end up as Delay's cell mate. LOL. And had Delay confined his dishonesty to Washington, he probably would only have been censured.



no he's not:


Renting Harlem apartments at below-market rates

The New York Times reported in July 2008 that Rangel rents four apartments at below-market rates in the Lenox Terrace complex in Harlem. It reported that Rangel paid $3,894 monthly for all four apartments in 2007. In contrast, the landlord's going rate for similar apartments in the building was as high as $8,125 monthly. Three adjacent apartments were combined to create his 2,500-square-foot (230 m2) home. A fourth unit is used as a campaign office, which violates city and state regulations that require rent-stabilized apartments to be used as a primary residence. Rangel received thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from one of the landlord’s owners, according to the paper. Rangel said his rent does not affect his representation of his constituents.[54]

Congressional ethics experts said the difference in rent between what Rangel was paying and market rates, an estimated $30,000 per year, could be construed as a gift, exceeding the $100 House of Representatives gift limit.[54] In late July, the House voted 254–138 to table a resolution by Republican Minority Leader John Boehner that would have censured Rangel for having "dishonored himself and brought discredit to the House", by occupying the four apartments.[101]
[edit] House parking garage

A September 2008 New York Post article reported that Rangel had been using a House parking garage as free storage space for his Mercedes-Benz for years, in apparent violation of Congressional rules. Under IRS regulations, free parking (here, worth $290 a month) is considered imputed income, and must be declared on tax returns.[102] In July 2010 the House Ethics Committee ruled that Rangel had committed no violation, since in practice the parking policy was only applied to Congressional staff and not to members themselves.[103]
[edit] Taxes on Dominican villa rental income

Rangel was accused of failing to report income from his rental of a beachside villa he owns in Punta Cana in the Dominican Republic. A three-bedroom, three-bath unit, it has rented out for as much as $1,100 per night in the busiest tourist season.[104]

Labor lawyer Theodore Kheel, a principal investor in the resort development company and frequent campaign contributor to Rangel, had encouraged him to purchase the villa. Rangel purchased it in 1988 for $82,750. He financed $53,737.50 of the purchase price for seven years at an interest rate of 10.5%, but was one of several early investors whose interest payments were waived in 1990.[105]

In September 2008, Rangel's attorney, Lanny Davis, disclosed that Rangel had failed to report on his tax returns or in congressional disclosure forms $75,000 in income he had received for renting his Dominican villa. That month, Rangel paid $10,800 to cover his liability for the related back taxes.[106][107] He had owed back taxes for at least three years. The Ways and Means Committee writes the U.S. tax code, and as such his failure to pay taxes himself led to heavy criticism.[107]

A September 14, 2008, New York Times editorial called for Rangel to step down temporarily from his chairmanship of the Ways and Means Committee while his ethical problems were investigated.[108]

On September 24, 2008, the House Ethics Committee announced that it would investigate whether Rangel had violated its code of conduct or any law or other regulation related to his performance of his duties.[109] On November 23, 2008, The New York Post reported that Rangel took a "homestead" tax break on his Washington, DC, house for years, while simultaneously occupying multiple New York City rent-stabilized apartments, "possibly violating laws and regulations in both cases."[110] In January 2009, Republican Representative John R. Carter introduced the Rangel Rule Act of 2009 (H.R. 735), a tongue-in-cheek proposal that would have allowed all taxpayers to not pay penalties and interest on back taxes, in reference to Rangel not yet having paid his.[111]



Tax evasion?
 
Back
Top Bottom