We already knew that. but notice that according to that same email the government would take in more revenue that it puts out over a 10-year perioed. I don't see that as problematic. But the deficit hawks apparently do!
As for the supreme court comment, that doesn't actually mean anything to me. The supreme court understanding is the the result of the understanding of the people. If the people don't understand what is written we can't expect the people that come from the people to understand it either, aka the supreme court.
As for the supreme court as it stands now, its doesn't actually run by its original intent. If it did, all people that show political basis would be booted, which clearly does not happen though it did originally.
Last edited by Henrin; 01-07-11 at 06:10 PM.
What you're really trying to say is, "That's not what I want them to do." I guess that's what the midterms were all about. Time will tell if what was done is of benefit or hinderence to our country's overall health and welfare.
I'm fine letting the Supreme Court iron things out.
Approved Applications for Waiver of the Annual Limits Requirements of the PHS Act Section 2711 as of December 3, 2010
including the SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
you don't know what you're talking about
would a person who is demonstrably unfamiliar with MISTER mccaskill even know who sebelius is?
So, instead of that, now I have to pay even more money out of my pocket, because of Obamacare? How does this help me, again?I know you are aware of this - that a portion of our insurance premiums go towards paying for those non-funded health care costs. What you're complaining about - individuals on social programs like Medicaid - are dipping in your pockets via your tax dollars. But that's not the issue at hand here. Regardless, either way YOU ARE PAYING FOR IT - be it Medicaid for the poor or higher premiums due to the lazy SOB who refuses to get health care but can afford to do so.
I fail to see how someone would be taking money out of your pocket if EVERYONE were paying for their own health insurance...you know...that "being responsible" thing you and Conservative and cpwill and so many others are always talking about that everyone should be doing anyway.So, instead of that, now I have to pay even more money out of my pocket, because of Obamacare? How does this help me, again?
Again, it's a "freedom" vs "individual responsibility" thing. Which side are you on?