As do I!Goldenboy, I lived and worked in the real world.
Would you have liked it to fall even more? Does 20% U-3 unemployment actually appeal to you, or your ideology?Nothing you say is going to change my mind nor the actual results generated. When the GDP is maintained at these levels because of Govt. spending it is the cost that destroys your message.
Another fallacy. Increased government spending during economic downturns has been implemented by both Reagan and Bush II. You cannot deny it.If all that govt. spending is so good, let's just completely destroy the private sector and let the govt. run 100% of the economy? Of course you know the reason that isn't done but are too much of an ideologue to admit it.
How my ideas are judged here doesn't matter, what matters are the actual results.
Obama's policy is responsible for 4 million unemployed people? You can back this up with some sort of tangible evidence other than an ill-informed opinion?"Your" President has implemented an economic policy boosted by massive govt. spending and has created 4 million more unemployed people and added 3.5 trillion to the debt.
This is the reality of how the economy is composed. If it is over your head, please refrain from attempting to dumb down the conversation with useless drivel.Those are undeniable facts. All your comments are theory and intellectual psychobabble that doesn't put the food on the table for millions of unemployed Americans including millions more that aren't being counted