• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama aide: Debt limit fight could be "catastrophic"

Now there is the right answer, nothing shows up as a match when you click in the link. You have offered nothing but your own opinions.

Try again, it's full of empty talking points, impotent rage, and teabagger nonsense.

Not one link to proof or facts to back up the b.s.
 
Well he did collude with the insurance industry in making his healthcare bill, but you still have not proved that Obama wants to kill people, only that he wants to give them up to the insurance industry's mercy.


That must really upset you, knowing that Obama is siding with big business?


j-mac
 
Try again, it's full of empty talking points, impotent rage, and teabagger nonsense.

Not one link to proof or facts to back up the b.s.

I am not sure DP searches link correctly. None the less, the response to that post was so damn creative :lamo
 
That must really upset you, knowing that Obama is siding with big business?


j-mac

I expected it. I am not upset. He is just, in Rick Rozzoff's words, "the latest rotating imperator of the first global empire."
 
Try again, it's full of empty talking points, impotent rage, and teabagger nonsense.

Not one link to proof or facts to back up the b.s.

Why present facts to a liberal when opinions and out right jealousy serves you so well. Got it, govt. power when controlled by a liberal good, govt. power that focuses on individual responsibility bad. My facts are impeccable, suggest you research them. Notice you have never provided specifics that you believe to be empty talking points, impotent rage, and teabagger nonsense. BEA.gov, BLS.gov, and the U.S. Treasury are non partisan sites that obviously get in the way of your rage, talking opinions, and liberal nonsense.
 
I expected it. I am not upset. He is just, in Rick Rozzoff's words, "the latest rotating imperator of the first global empire."

How has Glenn Beck hurt you or your family? Notice that anyone who benefits from their own initiative is demonized by liberals?
 
For those libs in here calling for back up of what I said about Obama advisors wanting to kill off old people, you don't have to get it from me, or even believe it, but research it yourselves, and if you are honest with yourself, you can not come to any other conclusion.

Listen to Robert Reich in a speech....




Now this is an advisor to President Obama. he has the ear of the President, and he is saying if you are going to be honest that you would tell the American people, the elderly "we are not going to spend all of that money, and technology on you, we are going to let you die."


j-mac
 
Why present facts to a liberal when opinions and out right jealousy serves you so well. Got it, govt. power when controlled by a liberal good, govt. power that focuses on individual responsibility bad.

Meaningless ad hoc bs.


My facts are impeccable, suggest you research them. Notice you have never provided specifics that you believe to be empty talking points, impotent rage, and teabagger nonsense. BEA.gov, BLS.gov, and the U.S. Treasury are non partisan sites that obviously get in the way of your rage, talking opinions, and liberal nonsense.

Hysterically funny self-deception...
 
For those libs in here calling for back up of what I said about Obama advisors wanting to kill off old people, you don't have to get it from me, or even believe it, but research it yourselves, and if you are honest with yourself, you can not come to any other conclusion.j-mac

How about you actually back up your claims, since you are the one making them?
 
Hey, genius... A speech is not 'fact'. It's that O-word.

Try again.

So Obama didn't say that we should give grandma an aspirin and send her home? You don't want facts, you prefer being deceived by rhetoric.
 
I expected it. I am not upset. He is just, in Rick Rozzoff's words, "the latest rotating imperator of the first global empire."


Rick Rozzoff? Rhymes with.....:lol: Look, these are the same jerks that sat around some 30 years ago, and pondered how they would exterminate 30 million Americans necessarily to take over America and turn it communist, along with Bill Ayers.

But good to see that you give Obama a pass for that, if it were Bush on the other hand you'd be placing him on the spit, and checking the coals.:2wave:

j-mac
 
How has Glenn Beck hurt you or your family? Notice that anyone who benefits from their own initiative is demonized by liberals?

What does Glenn Beck have anything to do with what I posted? J-Mac and I were talking about Obama.

Try reading.
 
Last edited:
So Obama didn't say that we should give grandma an aspirin and send her home? You don't want facts, you prefer being deceived by rhetoric.

No he did not.


He was talking about getting rid of unnecessary practices and tests that studies show have no health value whatsoever. He said nothing about killing her.
 
Rick Rozzoff? Rhymes with.....:lol: Look, these are the same jerks that sat around some 30 years ago, and pondered how they would exterminate 30 million Americans necessarily to take over America and turn it communist, along with Bill Ayers.

But good to see that you give Obama a pass for that, if it were Bush on the other hand you'd be placing him on the spit, and checking the coals.:2wave:

j-mac

Wow. You really don't know me. I am not giving him a pass. I don't like Obama even more than I don't like Bush.

Oh yeah and I have yet to see you give proof that Obama wants to kill seniors.
 
Last edited:
What does Glenn Beck have anything to do with what I posted? J-Mac and I were talking about Obama.

Try reading.

You are right, my apology. See apologizing for making a mistake isn't really that tough
 
I apologized for my mistake, do you have a problem with that?

No I thank you for apologizing and commend you on it but you said "See apologizing for making a mistake isn't really that tough." which leads me to think that you are implying something. If not, I apologize for accusing you.
 
And here we see it folks....I did make a statement, one that deserves back up of my contentions, and am providing them in post after post, but the example of how the liberals here, not only refuse to address those facts, but instead, chose to go on Allensky style ad hominem attacks, and ignore what is actually presented them I give you one example.....of many....

I posted this:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...ght-could-catastrophic-19.html#post1059198503

To which Mr. Invisible responded:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...ght-could-catastrophic-19.html#post1059198508

Now notice how he refused to address the video at all, or even address the entire post. No, he took the first paragraph, and used it to pull me out of context as if I hadn't posted anything other than what he quoted, while ignoring the substance of the post itself. Further Hazelnut feels the need to jump in with:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...ght-could-catastrophic-19.html#post1059198510

By aggressively using the term 'genius' he is attempting to use intimidation to get me to back down from my argument, this is covered in Rules for Radicals as marginalization of your opponent. It is a tired, and washed up tactic.

Then Hazel returns two postings later, to not address anything of substance, but rather throw more insults:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...ght-could-catastrophic-19.html#post1059198513

You liberals are a complete joke! You are not interested in facts, or achieving anything other than complete capitulation from those that disagree with you, and as such are not only a waste of bandwidth, but a waste of time. I can only hope that at some point we can have a real discussion of facts, but I rather doubt it.


j-mac
 
Wow. You really don't know me. I am not giving him a pass. I don't like Obama even more than I don't like Bush.

Oh yeah and I have yet to see you give proof that Obama wants to kill seniors.


Ok, I'll give the benefit of the doubt, it could be Hazel skewing the conversation.

Tell me what proof do you need? What will suffice?


j-mac
 
Ok, I'll give the benefit of the doubt, it could be Hazel skewing the conversation.

Tell me what proof do you need? What will suffice?


j-mac

Just an article from a balanced news source (like CSM for example) with a quote from Obama himself or ones of his aides saying that he wants to kill old people.
 
Just an article from a balanced news source (like CSM for example) with a quote from Obama himself or ones of his aides saying that he wants to kill old people.


And you think those words exist, or that any President would be stupid enough to say that? (Biden aside, he is stupid enough) He (Obama) is one of the best Teleprompter readers out there, has a great shot at an MSNBC slot when he is done playing Manchurian President next year. ;)

But seriously, this is analysis, you know that right?


j-mac
 
Back
Top Bottom