All of which don't mean a thing if he's so unproffesional that he'd send a video like this out to the nearly 6000 service members on his ship.[/QUOTE]
And no one cared for years until DADT repeal came along.......You think they should keelhaul the guy?
I don't think that this had so much to do with the DADT repeal as it did with him being reassigned to the ship as her CO. There were probably at least a couple of people still aboard that ship that were there when he was XO and making those videos, plus the videos were still available to be seen on at least one of the ship's computers. If there were people on board who had seen these videos (either while he was XO or after his time aboard) and they were offended, then they may very well have not wanted to serve under this guy being CO. From the videos, it may appear that this guy wouldn't seriously look into charges of sexual harassment or discrimination (even if this wasn't true, the videos still could be perceived to look this way). It would only take one person who was afraid of this scenario to turn these videos into the media if it didn't appear that the Navy was going to do anything about it.
It is even possible that someone higher up, not even in the chain of command of the carrier turned the videos into the press.
Either way, it is the perception that matters, not how the guy actually acts. And this is especially true for officers in command. There can be no perception that they are not going to seriously observe the rules of the Navy.